Real World Data Transfers
No matter how good a synthetic benchmark like IOMeter or PCMark is, it can not really tell you how your hard drive will perform in “real world” situations. All of us here at Hardware Canucks strive to give you the best, most complete picture of a review item’s true capabilities and to this end we will be running timed data transfers to give you a general idea of how its performance relates to real life use. To help replicate worse case scenarios we will transfer a 10.00GB file and a folder containing 400 subfolders with a total 12,000 files varying in length from 200mb to 100kb (10.00 GB total).
Testing will include transfer to and transferring from the devices, using MS RichCopy (set to 1 file depth) and logging the performance of the drive. Here is what we found.
As expected, the large file sequential transfer speed of this drive is very good and the difference between it and a 240GB version is minor. Of course, since the Vertex 3 240GB hit the ceiling of what our PCI-E card can handle the difference may be slightly larger than what the charts show, but we doubt it is much.
With small file transfer test the results are not quiet as conclusive. On the one hand we are seeing about a 30% percent increase in performance over the last generation, but the difference between what the 120 and 240GB iterations of the SF2281 can do is nearly as significant. This obviously helps explain why both Vista and Adobe results came back with such similar, lukewarm results. The 120GB is very fast, but the NAND is what is holding it back from being even better.
Real World Data Transfers
No matter how good a synthetic benchmark like IOMeter or PCMark is, it can not really tell you how your hard drive will perform in “real world” situations. All of us here at Hardware Canucks strive to give you the best, most complete picture of a review item’s true capabilities and to this end we will be running timed data transfers to give you a general idea of how its performance relates to real life use. To help replicate worse case scenarios we will transfer a 10.00GB file and a folder containing 400 subfolders with a total 12,000 files varying in length from 200mb to 100kb (10.00 GB total).
Testing will include transfer to and transferring from the devices, using MS RichCopy (set to 1 file depth) and logging the performance of the drive. Here is what we found.
As expected, the large file sequential transfer speed of this drive is very good and the difference between it and a 240GB version is minor. Of course, since the Vertex 3 240GB hit the ceiling of what our PCI-E card can handle the difference may be slightly larger than what the charts show, but we doubt it is much.
With small file transfer test the results are not quiet as conclusive. On the one hand we are seeing about a 30% percent increase in performance over the last generation, but the difference between what the 120 and 240GB iterations of the SF2281 can do is nearly as significant. This obviously helps explain why both Vista and Adobe results came back with such similar, lukewarm results. The 120GB is very fast, but the NAND is what is holding it back from being even better.
Last edited by a moderator: