Categories




Review Contents:

Crysis Warhead Hardware Performance Review

by FiXT     |     October 10, 2008

Ram and OS Comparison


Two is the new One, at least when discussing gaming PC's and their Ram. While we can no longer state "ram prices are at an all-time low" (they have been there for some time), the continuing affordability of DDR2 memory has helped make 2GB of RAM the standard, and as such that is where we will start. Crysis Warhead, having the same recommendations as the first, lists 1GB of RAM as necessary in Windows XP and 1.5GB of RAM in Windows Vista. We don't expect to see any adverse performance in our tests, but will there be improvements? The other question inquiring minds want to know is whether or not Vista is the evil monster that gobbles frames as fabled across internet forums. Our tests incorporate both DirectX9 and 10 results which will be expanded on further in the review.


Overall, the differences are minor. There are minute improvements going from 2GB to 4GB, but they are negligible at that. Windows XP does perform better than Vista but only by a fraction. Vista also gains the advantage of being able to use DirectX10, which does result in diminished framerates, but supposedly carries visual benefits.


Ram Usage

The following results were achieved by monitoring ram usage during the benchmarks, giving us some intriguing results. In our FPS test (shown above), the differences in framerates between 2GB and 4GB was minimal, but our usage charts show total system usage sitting at 2.35GB's in DX9 mode when using 4GB of ram. With only 2GB of ram, the total system usage drops to 1.9GB. Crysis Warhead still uses the same amount of memory - roughly 1.2GB - however, it is clear Vista holds some of your memory hostage when there is more physical memory available. Unfortunately, while 2GB will suffice, it does not leave a lot of wiggle room for programs to fight over resources. Users may find themselves experiencing slow downs if active processes exceed a very meager 800MB at system idle.


We see DirectX10 finally being put to good use and doing part of what was originally intended; optimizing game performance and better allocating resources. There is a clear and sharp decrease in ram usage in Warhead with DirectX10 enabled, but there are some drawbacks as we will demonstrate later in the review.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Bookmark to Slashdot!Stumble this Post!Reddit! Bookmark to Newsvine!
 

Latest Reviews in Games
December 23, 2008
In our first GPU performance article, we promised you a closer look at how modestly-priced video cards performed in some of this season's most-played games. Well, today we make good on that promise. ...
December 10, 2008
As Christmas approaches, many of us have the latest games on our wish lists but are unsure which GPUs perform best. In the first part of a two part series, we take a look at high-end GPU performance ...
November 21, 2008
Even though Far Cry 2 has been out for a little while, it is still an extremely popular game and it boasts some of the best visuals available on the PC today. All of this eye candy leads to some uniq...
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/10671-crysis-warhead-hardware-performance-review.html
Posted By Date
Thinking of upgrading my graphics card, is it worth the money? - Icrontic Forums November 29, 2009 04:02 PM
?? ??PC???????: Crysis Warhead Hardware Performance ????????? November 16, 2009 05:16 AM
Futuremark - News - Newsarticle September 23, 2009 08:55 PM
E8200 at $110 or E8500 at $160? August 17, 2009 07:58 AM
E8200 at $110 or E8500 at $160? June 24, 2009 04:32 PM
Hardware Base - View topic - Crysis June 14, 2009 11:42 AM
Hardware Performance Review of Crysis Warhead - PCSTATS.com June 2, 2009 12:06 PM
Crysis Warhead Hardware Performance Review @ Hardware Canucks June 2, 2009 11:54 AM
Enthusiast Hardware News and Niche Market Hardware Guide - Ninjalane.com May 31, 2009 01:22 PM
Week of October 5, 2008 May 27, 2009 11:14 AM
4870x2 reviews analysis and X2 scaling. Crossfire matured? - Rage3D Discussion Area May 26, 2009 04:33 AM
Crysis Warhead - Page 27 - TweakGuides Forums May 15, 2009 07:43 AM
AMD Game Forums - 4870X2 underperforming May 9, 2009 03:22 AM
GameSpot Forums - The Custom-Built PC Union Board - ***Review*** Crysis Warhead Hardware Performance Review May 5, 2009 07:15 PM
ATi ou Nvidia pour Crysis Warhead? - PC - FORUM Generation 3D April 26, 2009 04:49 AM
Crysis Warhead Hardware Performance Review April 26, 2009 03:41 AM
Crysis Warhead Hardware Performance Review April 24, 2009 05:31 PM
Hardware Performance Review of Crysis Warhead April 24, 2009 01:42 AM
info_drip? Crysis Warhead Hardware Performance?????????? April 20, 2009 07:53 PM
AnandTech - Socket 939 bottlenecking GTX 280 at 1920x1200? April 15, 2009 10:44 AM
AnandTech - Crysis Warhead Benchmarks April 6, 2009 01:29 PM
Noticias 3D - Anlisis del rendimiento Crysis Warhead April 4, 2009 03:17 PM