Go Back   Hardware Canucks > PC BUILDERS & TWEAKERS CORNER > Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old May 14, 2009, 07:31 PM
Top Prospect
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 142
Default Intel Burn Test 1.92 Any Good?

Hey guys,

I've been surfing around and found the Intel Burn Test, according to the manual it says:

1. More accurate than Prime95 Small FFTs/Blend.
2. Takes less time to tell if your CPU/RAM is unstable than Prime95 (usually
something like 8 minutes Linpack vs 40 hours under Prime95).
3. Use the same stress-testing engine that Intel uses to test their products
before they are packed and put on shelves for sale.

So is it true? or should I avoid this and stick to prime 95?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old May 14, 2009, 07:43 PM
Delavan's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2007
Location: AB
Posts: 1,165

Good question!
I can't wait to find out what the answer is!
i7 4770K @ 4.0GHz / Corsair H100i / MSI Z97A Gaming 6 / 16GB Kingston Hyper X 1.5V 1600 / MSI GTX1070 FE / Samsung 850 Evo 500gb / Corsair Performance Pro 128GB SSD / Intel 520 120GB SSD / WD Black 640 GB storage / XFX 850 watts Black Edition PSU

ROG G53SX laptop: i7 2630QM / 12GB DDR3 / GTX560m 2GB / 750GB 7200rpm (14 000 3Dmarks06)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old May 14, 2009, 08:10 PM
enaberif's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgahree, AB
Posts: 11,128

Some say yes.
Some say no.

I personally do not like it.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old May 14, 2009, 09:06 PM
JD's Avatar
JD JD is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 8,111

My System Specs


I prefer LinX myself for Linpack testing. Better GUI/options.

I find it fails much faster than Prime95, but that's just one man's opinion...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old May 14, 2009, 09:11 PM
Top Prospect
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 108

My System Specs


I find folding@home the best cpu stability test i've ever run. Ive had OCCT run for hours,and Prime will run without hickups,but fire up F@h and if its shakey its lucky to run for 5 min. I still like Prime if i'm testing cpu+ram testing though.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old May 14, 2009, 09:14 PM
geokilla's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,762

My System Specs


I'm not fond of Intel's Burn Test either. I just run 2 to 3 hours of OCCT plus some Memtest, then I call myself stable. Some may say it's not stable, but we all have our definition of what's stable.

There is a good thing about Intel's Burn Test. It creates EXCESSIVE heat for the CPU.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old May 15, 2009, 05:05 AM
gingerbee's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Orillia, Ontario
Posts: 6,876

My System Specs


don't likey at all
Fav quote "One should strive to achieve; not sit in bitter regret." Ronin Harris
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old May 15, 2009, 06:18 AM
SKYMTL's Avatar
HardwareCanuck Review Editor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 13,625

I'm not too crazy about it either. It is GREAT for testing heatsink performance but other than that? Not so much.

IMO, a good stability test is never just one program. Rather, you need to use a combination of programs such as Prime 95 and OCCT. Even though it might be perfectly stable in both of those, is it 3D stable? That is a huge question for gamers as me and many other people have run Prime / OCCT for hours on end without an error and then fire up 3DMark or a game and...BAM, instability.

I would suggest you check out some of the motherboard reviews here at HWC and read the Testing Methodology section where we cover what we consider "stable".
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old May 15, 2009, 07:52 AM
HuttFuzz's Avatar
Top Prospect
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 50

FYI, i use LinX (which is Intel Burn Test), for about 20 passes. Then i do Prime95 Blend for 2 hours and when i have time i will run Prime95 Small FFT overnight. That is a good mix.

Throw in some benchmark like 3dMark and you can't be better.
Core i7 920(D0) @4.0 1.212v | Gigabyte EX58-UD3R | OCZ Gold 3x2GB CL8 | Silverstone FT01-BW | TRUE 1366-RT | eVga GTX275 FTW (713/1512/1260) | Corsair TX850w | Hitachi 500GB | Seagate 7200.11 750GB | Dual Screen (Dell 2208wfp & Viewsonic VP930b)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old May 15, 2009, 10:39 AM
rjbarker's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Courtenay, B.C
Posts: 6,152

My System Specs


LinX Linpack 0.5.8 - All Available Memory - 25 passes
P95 Blend overnight to 10 hrs

If I pass both, i'm solid.

Firestrike Extreme: 21.452
MARK 11: 32.530

Introducing me n my OCD to Watercooling, is like taking an Alcoholic to an "all you can drink" Beach Bar in Mexico

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
intel Smackover - any good? dadzilla CPU's and Motherboards 6 April 19, 2009 07:51 PM
Testing Intel Burn Test 64 and Prime 95 64 (Help?) appplejack Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking 1 January 11, 2009 04:53 PM
could i burn out my mobo by....? andynerd CPU's and Motherboards 9 December 28, 2008 10:29 PM
Good test programs for new rigs. chouchou O/S's, Drivers & General Software 6 October 22, 2008 05:01 PM
Burn time enzeo Storage 3 July 24, 2007 11:13 PM