Rambus, a company well known for the aggressive protection of their intellectual property, has been successful in a patent investigation launched against NVIDIA in 2008.
The investigation, headed by the US International Trade Commission, alleged that NVIDIA, as well as its customers including Asus, BFG, Biostar, Diablotek Inc., EVGA, Giga-Byte, Hewlett-Packard, MSI, Palit, Pine Technology (XFX) Ltd., and Sparkle infringed on memory controller patents held by Rambus and found on graphics processors, application processors, media and communications processors, and chipsets.
Yesterday, the ITC sided with Rambus and found that NVIDIA infringed on nine of the companies patents. The ITC has issued a Limited Exclusion Order, which, while technically banning the import and sale of infringing products, does allow NVIDIA to post a bond of 2.65% of the products value and continue importing and selling for the next 60 days.
The ruling on the injunction will be forwarded to USA President, Barrack Obama for Presidential review.
NVIDIA has promised consumers it will continue to produce and ship products, while appealing the ruling. However, there is a possibility that the fees could be passed on to consumers and supply in the USA markets of some NVIDIA products may dwindle. If NVIDIA is unable to successfully appeal the ruling or have changes made during the review it may be forced to come to a financial settlement with Rambus, cutting deep into their revenue and ultimately driving up prices.
Roughly a year ago, the US Patent office dismissed multiple Rambus patent infringement allegations. Approximately 96% of Rambus’s $113 million dollar revenue in 2009 came from patent licensing royalties.



July 27, 2010 11:59 AM
Those than can, do, those that can't, sue.
July 27, 2010 12:22 PM
Rambus is really just a patent troll now. Do they even produce a product anymore?
July 27, 2010 12:27 PM
Ho, that's no good for Nvidia. But well, rambus we know where apple get their hobby of keeping their thing for them.
July 27, 2010 12:55 PM
man the goblin has met an eviler match!
curious to see if any price jump.
July 27, 2010 03:16 PM
I laughed at patent troll image. Guess it suits them.
July 27, 2010 03:21 PM
UGH! freakin rambus. i hope it gets denied so prices won't go up...
July 27, 2010 03:58 PM
I am not 100% sure, but after that time, if the US President does not repeal the ruling, or it is not successfully appealed, NVIDIA will have no choice to but to agree to settlement terms with Rambus or face being unable to completely import or sell their products.
Seeing as how Rambus recently settled with Samsung over a similar matter for $900 MILLION dollars, you can imagine what kind of result such an enormous settlement would have on price
July 27, 2010 05:04 PM
oh this just sucks
July 27, 2010 05:18 PM
I really think patent infringement lawsuits should only be applicable when the inventor actually makes a product. Patenting something and sitting back watching your royalties doesn't help anyone.
Where the hell is Rambus's graphics cards?
July 27, 2010 05:19 PM
interesting business methods,nonetheless. if it was on a smaller scale a few pops wouldve perhaps settled the matter nicely and quietly? :)
July 27, 2010 08:32 PM
What does RAMBUS do?
July 28, 2010 06:14 AM
GRR! Stupid Rambus! They should re-purpose into a law firm, since that's all they do. "Rambus and Associates". nVidia products are already expensive enough without this.
July 28, 2010 03:06 PM
I am not 100% sure, but after that time, if the US President does not repeal the ruling, or it is not successfully appealed, NVIDIA will have no choice to but to agree to settlement terms with Rambus or face being unable to completely import or sell their products.
Seeing as how Rambus recently settled with Samsung over a similar matter for $900 MILLION dollars, you can imagine what kind of result such an enormous settlement would have on price
Slashdot Hardware Story | Commission Affirms NVIDIA Violated Rambus Patents
Get your nV cards now, the price is going up!
July 29, 2010 08:38 PM
I'm glad whenever I see anybody stepping on nVidia's toes in whatever form.
If I ever come across their Huang CEO at a conference or something, I'd step on his toes too. 
July 29, 2010 10:05 PM
Meh, whats bad for one company is bad for another. Regardless if your an ATI fanboy or an Nvidia one this will affect you. If you love Nvidia its more expensive to get a video card, and if you love ATI than they have no reason to lower their prices because the competitor is higher priced as well. In the end everyone pays more, everyone loses.
August 3, 2010 11:32 AM
The USPTO did not reject RAMBUS infringement allegations, it actually rejected the validity of some Patent claims, which happen to be claims which RAMBUS had asserted against Nvidia in the ITC proceedings. The USPTO has nothing to do with infringement allegations, whether at the ITC or in a court. The validity (re-examination) of the Patent claims is a different and separate procedure from infringement allegations.
Just my 2 cents.