While most of us have been awaiting the next generation GTX300 series cards from nVidia, various internet reports claim the company has been quietly releasing updates to many of their classic series of cards. That brings us to the rumoured GT240 which has been expected to replace the vaunted yet still widely used 9600 cards.
Based upon the GT215, a variant of the GT200 series chipset. These newest incarnations from nVidia promise to be less power hungry and cooler than the older cards they are slated to replace, more so when you consider the use of 40nm fabrication technology.
Keeping with the same basic layout, the GT240 will feature 96 shaders that are said to run at a clock frequency of 1340MHz. Core clock is slated to be a modest 550MHz as well.
Another major change beyond the 40nm die size is the move from GDDR2 RAM (featured on the 9600) to GDDR3 instead. Additionally, a leak from Fudzilla claims that certain manufacturer’s will be producing a GDDR5 variant. This should help with the overall memory clocks of the card, and promises it to be faster than their previous generation with unconfirmed speeds of 1800MHz. With either 512 or 1GB of onboard memory, working off of a 128-bit bus the GT240 does promise to be an honest replacement vs the typical re-brand we are used to seeing.
Naturally PhysX support is standard, along with DirectX 10.1 compatibility. This will help plant the latest GT firmly in the mid-range market catering to both those with budget systems and those who want a dedicated physX card in their machine.
Pricing and availability are not yet known, but it should be safe to say they will fall somewhere in the $80-100 CAD range once released.

November 4, 2009 05:07 PM
More rebranding! Hurray!
November 4, 2009 06:05 PM
at beginning its fine and dandy and easy to keep track but now you are just killing me with your constant rebranding
November 4, 2009 06:37 PM
It is but it isn't guys. THe clocks should be higher and its DDR3 not DDR2 , plus 40nm Technology which will make it cooler and more efficent.
Regards,
ST
November 4, 2009 06:58 PM
Regards,
ST
....Its still frikken Hyundai Accent
I'm just saying
November 4, 2009 07:03 PM
....Its still frikken Hyundai Accent
I'm just saying
True, but a 1995 Hyundai Accent is not the same as a 2009 Accent.
ST
November 4, 2009 07:03 PM
....but its still a Hyundai
November 4, 2009 07:25 PM
lolz
This would be a good card if it was like $70
November 4, 2009 07:31 PM
....but its still a Hyundai
November 4, 2009 07:33 PM
The die shrink almost makes it worthy to be a legitimate "new" card..
I don't see why everyone is bothered about the re-branding... it's not like we as enthusiasts are fooled by it.. as long as there's an improvement (clock speeds/ shader count/ manufacturing process, ect) it's fine by me... an obvious attempt at gathering more dough on oldish tech, however it's working for them, and also giving us more options which doesn't really hurt. You could argue the price, however...
Plus if your card say... 8800GT gets RMA'd, potential chance they'll bump you to a GTS250? Bonus I guess.
November 4, 2009 08:28 PM
I don't quite understand HOW this is rebranding. Is it the same as the GT220?
November 4, 2009 08:30 PM
Similar act how 8800GT = 8800GTS = 9800GTX = 9800GTX+ = GTS250 lol
November 4, 2009 08:37 PM
Similar act how 8800GT = 8800GTS = 9800GTX = 9800GTX+ = GTS250 lol
8800GT=9800GT.
November 4, 2009 08:43 PM
Similar act how 8800GT = 8800GTS = 9800GTX = 9800GTX+ = GTS250 lol
November 4, 2009 08:51 PM
What 9600 are they talking about....I know of only the 9600GT and they have GDDR3.
NVIDIA. THE WAY IT'S MEANT TO BE RENAMED.
November 4, 2009 08:51 PM
8800GT=9800GT.
November 4, 2009 08:53 PM
If you think this is a rebrand.....
Then the HD 4800-series is a rebranded HD 3800 series and the HD 5800 series is a rebranded HD 4800 series. Oh look, that means ATI has carried the same architecture over for the last three generations! /sarcasm. Actually, they have......
C'mon guys, this isn't a rebrand, it is an architectural evolution much like ATI has been doing for the past half decade...
November 4, 2009 09:24 PM
Then the HD 4800-series is a rebranded HD 3800 series and the HD 5800 series is a rebranded HD 4800 series. Oh look, that means ATI has carried the same architecture over for the last three generations! /sarcasm. Actually, they have......
C'mon guys, this isn't a rebrand, it is an architectural evolution much like ATI has been doing for the past half decade...
November 5, 2009 08:24 AM
Ah, no, not a re-brand, but not really new architecture either. This is a die-shrink. Each ATI generation has been new chip design. Within each generation ATI also has die-shrinks similar to this (4770).
Yes, a die-shrink is an architectural evolution, but it is a very slow one, which is why folks like to call it a rebrand. NVidia finally gets DX10.1, but after how long? Where is DX11? Oh yeah, we're supposed to buy into NVidia PR, and believe that we all need massive and expensive GPU's that do things we don't even have software for, plus proprietary PhysX. And if you want to believe them, I have some cheap land in Florida that I'll sell you (and a free NVidia G84 chip to go along with it..).
Sorry, but I believe NVidia made a miscalculation, and are now trying to spin their way out of it.
November 5, 2009 09:34 AM
The same doesn't really go for Nvidia. The difference between the G80 / G92 and G200 is quite significant. Granted, the GT 240 could still be classified as a derivative of the G92 family but it adds functionality (GDDR5, die shrink, DX10.1) much like ATI has been adding functionality to their chips.
There is no difference.
November 5, 2009 09:37 AM
I just wish they would quit makin new low end cards and get the damn fermi cards out!!! tired of waitin for it to happen
November 5, 2009 10:11 AM
ST
November 5, 2009 10:35 AM
8800GT---->9800GT---->GT240??? or have they finally do something new???
November 5, 2009 11:38 AM
November 5, 2009 02:29 PM
My god, does no one notice this is GT215? 9600GT is G94 I believe. Not the same. Really.
EDIT: My bad, missed half the discussion b/c I missed the whole 2nd page lol.
November 5, 2009 04:38 PM
Its still a cut down G92.
November 5, 2009 04:44 PM
November 5, 2009 05:06 PM
what else was there again?
November 5, 2009 05:32 PM
what else was there again?
November 5, 2009 06:47 PM
November 5, 2009 06:57 PM
Alright guys, can we keep this a little more civil. I do not want to have to lock a thread on something I wrote.
ST
November 5, 2009 07:18 PM
My bad, i got carried away
I am really not impress with the works of nvidia as of late
November 5, 2009 07:18 PM
Um if this chip is the same as a 8800 GT then I could say that Pentium 3 = Pentium 4 = Core 2 Duo = Core i5 = Core i7 = Core i9
Really do you think the 2000 series from ATI is THAT much different than the 3000 series? Then could you say the 3000 series is THAT much different from the 4000 series. Then could you say the 4000 series is THAT much different from the 5000 series. So in your guys words 2000 series = 5000 series.
I don't care who you are but adding DX 10.1 over DX 10 and then adding GDDR5 over 3 means a new GPU name too me. Personally I think the GTX 260 core 216 should have been called the GTX 265. Everyone keeps pointing out pointless accusations at nvidia when ATI is doing the same thing. Who cares not like they are forcing you to buy it.