Home Reviews Articles News Forums Charts Techwiki Store
  • Latest News

    • XFX Retail GTX480 & GTX 470 Cards Pictured
    • Scythe Launches Yasya CPU Cooler
    • PowerColor Launches HD5770 Eyefinity 5 Card
    • LSI Starts Shipping LSISSS6200 PCI-E Solid State Storage Card
    • NVIDIA Slips in 197.13 BETA Drivers
    • AMD Phenom II X6 “Thuban” Clock Speeds Leaked
    • Southpaws Unite – Razer Develops Unique DeathAdder Gaming Mouse
    • ZOTAC Unleashes World’s First ION Upgrade Kits
  • Latest Reviews

    • XFX Radeon HD 5830 1GB GDDR5 Review
    • Gelid Tranquillo CPU Cooler Review
    • ASUS ROG Rampage III Extreme LGA1366 Motherboard Preview
    • ASUS Crosshair IV Formula AM3 890FX Motherboard Sneak Peak
    • Intel Core i7-980X Gulftown Six-Core 32nm Processor Review
    • ASUS HD 5870 Matrix 2GB & ASUS HD 5870 “V2″ Sneak Peek
    • NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 Roundup (EVGA, Gigabyte, MSI, Sparkle)
    • ASUS RoG Maximus III Extreme LGA 1156 Motherboard Preview
  • Featured Reviews

    • NVIDIA’s GeForce GF100 Under the Microscope
    • Cooler Master 690 II Advanced Case Review
    • Intel Westmere 32nm Launch & Clarkdale Core i5 661 CPU Review
    • 9-Way 850W Power Supply Roundup
    • Kingston SSDNow V Series 40GB SSD Review
    • EVGA P55 FTW LGA1156 Motherboard Review
    • Sapphire Radeon HD 5970 2GB OC Edition Review
    • XFX Radeon HD 5850 1GB GDDR5 Review

Nvidia GT240 Rumoured to Be Coming Soon  

Home > News > Video Card News > 
  Bookmark and Share
Posted by Soultribunal— November 4th, 2009, 11:24 AM

nvidia 21 300x223 Nvidia GT240 Rumoured to Be Coming Soon While most of us have been awaiting the next generation GTX300 series cards from nVidia, various internet reports claim the company has been quietly releasing updates to many of their classic series of cards. That brings us to the rumoured GT240 which has been expected to replace the vaunted yet still widely used 9600 cards.


Based upon the GT215, a variant of the GT200 series chipset. These newest incarnations from nVidia promise to be less power hungry and cooler than the older cards they are slated to replace, more so when you consider the use of 40nm fabrication technology.


Keeping with the same basic layout, the GT240 will feature 96 shaders that are said to run at a clock frequency of 1340MHz. Core clock is slated to be a modest 550MHz as well.


Another major change beyond the 40nm die size is the move from GDDR2 RAM (featured on the 9600) to GDDR3 instead. Additionally, a leak from Fudzilla claims that certain manufacturer’s will be producing a GDDR5 variant.  This should help with the overall memory clocks of the card, and promises it to be faster than their previous  generation with unconfirmed speeds of 1800MHz. With either 512 or 1GB of onboard memory, working off of a 128-bit bus the GT240 does promise to be an honest replacement vs the typical re-brand we are used to seeing.


Naturally PhysX support is standard, along with DirectX 10.1 compatibility. This will help plant the latest GT firmly in the mid-range market catering to both those with budget systems and those who want a dedicated physX card in their machine.


Pricing and availability are not yet known, but it should be safe to say they will fall somewhere in the $80-100 CAD range once released.







Tags: geforce, GT240, nvidia

Related News

  • MSI Launches N240GT Supporting Over-Voltage, Overclocking Support by Afterburner Software
  • GIGABYTE Launches NVIDIA GeForce GT220 and GeForce 210
  • MSI Announces N220GT & N210 Graphics Cards
  • NVIDIA GeForce 195.62 Drivers Receive WHQL Certification
  • NVIDIA GeForce Forceware 196.21 WHQL Drivers Released
 

Related Articles

Related Articles

  • MSI Launches N240GT Supporting Over-Voltage, Overclocking Support by Afterburner Software
  • GIGABYTE Launches NVIDIA GeForce GT220 and GeForce 210
  • MSI Announces N220GT & N210 Graphics Cards
  • NVIDIA GeForce 195.62 Drivers Receive WHQL Certification
  • NVIDIA GeForce Forceware 196.21 WHQL Drivers Released

Comments (32)

  1. kiwik's Avatar
    kiwik

    November 4, 2009 05:07 PM

    More rebranding! Hurray!

  2. Unregistered's Avatar
    Unregistered

    November 4, 2009 06:05 PM

    at beginning its fine and dandy and easy to keep track but now you are just killing me with your constant rebranding

  3. Soultribunal's Avatar
    Soultribunal

    November 4, 2009 06:37 PM

    It is but it isn't guys. THe clocks should be higher and its DDR3 not DDR2 , plus 40nm Technology which will make it cooler and more efficent.

    Regards,
    ST

  4. FiXT's Avatar
    FiXT

    November 4, 2009 06:58 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Soultribunal View Post
    It is but it isn't guys. THe clocks should be higher and its DDR3 not DDR2 , plus 40nm Technology which will make it cooler and more efficent.

    Regards,
    ST
    If I take a Hyundai Accent, add on a turbo, fmic, slam it and add a body kit with a yellow badge with a horse on it, then call it a Ferrari....

    ....Its still frikken Hyundai Accent


    I'm just saying

  5. Soultribunal's Avatar
    Soultribunal

    November 4, 2009 07:03 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by FiXT View Post
    If I take a Hyundai Accent, add on a turbo, fmic, slam it and add a body kit with a yellow badge with a horse on it, then call it a Ferrari....

    ....Its still frikken Hyundai Accent


    I'm just saying

    True, but a 1995 Hyundai Accent is not the same as a 2009 Accent.


    ST

  6. FiXT's Avatar
    FiXT

    November 4, 2009 07:03 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Soultribunal View Post
    True, but a 1995 Hyundai Accent is not the same as a 2009 Accent.
    Touche



    ....but its still a Hyundai

  7. headsh0t's Avatar
    headsh0t

    November 4, 2009 07:25 PM

    lolz This would be a good card if it was like $70

  8. 5ILVgeARX's Avatar
    5ILVgeARX

    November 4, 2009 07:31 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by FiXT View Post
    Touche



    ....but its still a Hyundai




    Quote:
    Originally Posted by headsh0t View Post
    lolz This would be a good card if it was like $70
    If 40NM becomes mainstream even $50 bucks is too much for that card

  9. Jake_HT's Avatar
    Jake_HT

    November 4, 2009 07:33 PM

    The die shrink almost makes it worthy to be a legitimate "new" card..

    I don't see why everyone is bothered about the re-branding... it's not like we as enthusiasts are fooled by it.. as long as there's an improvement (clock speeds/ shader count/ manufacturing process, ect) it's fine by me... an obvious attempt at gathering more dough on oldish tech, however it's working for them, and also giving us more options which doesn't really hurt. You could argue the price, however...

    Plus if your card say... 8800GT gets RMA'd, potential chance they'll bump you to a GTS250? Bonus I guess.

  10. Sushi Warrior's Avatar
    Sushi Warrior

    November 4, 2009 08:28 PM

    I don't quite understand HOW this is rebranding. Is it the same as the GT220?

  11. Jake_HT's Avatar
    Jake_HT

    November 4, 2009 08:30 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Sushi Warrior View Post
    I don't quite understand HOW this is rebranding. Is it the same as the GT220?
    Same as/ similar to previous 9600 series..

    Similar act how 8800GT = 8800GTS = 9800GTX = 9800GTX+ = GTS250 lol

  12. belgolas's Avatar
    belgolas

    November 4, 2009 08:37 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Jake_HT View Post
    Same as/ similar to previous 9600 series..

    Similar act how 8800GT = 8800GTS = 9800GTX = 9800GTX+ = GTS250 lol
    8800GT does not = 9800 GTX

    8800GT=9800GT.

  13. Sushi Warrior's Avatar
    Sushi Warrior

    November 4, 2009 08:43 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Jake_HT View Post
    Same as/ similar to previous 9600 series..

    Similar act how 8800GT = 8800GTS = 9800GTX = 9800GTX+ = GTS250 lol
    Holy hell, do you even think? If this = 9600GT then 5770 = 4870. Really. You're pulling at straws - this is new architecture, new manufacturing process, new everything. This is nothing like the 9600GT besides possibly specs wise.

  14. geokilla's Avatar
    geokilla

    November 4, 2009 08:51 PM

    What 9600 are they talking about....I know of only the 9600GT and they have GDDR3.

    NVIDIA. THE WAY IT'S MEANT TO BE RENAMED.

  15. Jake_HT's Avatar
    Jake_HT

    November 4, 2009 08:51 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Sushi Warrior View Post
    Holy hell, do you even think? If this = 9600GT then 5770 = 4870. Really. You're pulling at straws - this is new architecture, new manufacturing process, new everything. This is nothing like the 9600GT besides possibly specs wise.
    I guess I didn't mean "same as" rather, similar to, although it does count as a new card since there is a die shrink, different clocks.. etc.. refer to post 10. Like I said, I am fine with so called "re-branding" since there are evident changes.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by belogas
    8800GT does not = 9800 GTX

    8800GT=9800GT.
    Correct. Disregard that one.

  16. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    November 4, 2009 08:53 PM

    If you think this is a rebrand.....

    Then the HD 4800-series is a rebranded HD 3800 series and the HD 5800 series is a rebranded HD 4800 series. Oh look, that means ATI has carried the same architecture over for the last three generations! /sarcasm. Actually, they have......

    C'mon guys, this isn't a rebrand, it is an architectural evolution much like ATI has been doing for the past half decade...

  17. belgolas's Avatar
    belgolas

    November 4, 2009 09:24 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    If you think this is a rebrand.....

    Then the HD 4800-series is a rebranded HD 3800 series and the HD 5800 series is a rebranded HD 4800 series. Oh look, that means ATI has carried the same architecture over for the last three generations! /sarcasm. Actually, they have......

    C'mon guys, this isn't a rebrand, it is an architectural evolution much like ATI has been doing for the past half decade...
    I agree!

  18. rojmiller's Avatar
    rojmiller

    November 5, 2009 08:24 AM

    Ah, no, not a re-brand, but not really new architecture either. This is a die-shrink. Each ATI generation has been new chip design. Within each generation ATI also has die-shrinks similar to this (4770).

    Yes, a die-shrink is an architectural evolution, but it is a very slow one, which is why folks like to call it a rebrand. NVidia finally gets DX10.1, but after how long? Where is DX11? Oh yeah, we're supposed to buy into NVidia PR, and believe that we all need massive and expensive GPU's that do things we don't even have software for, plus proprietary PhysX. And if you want to believe them, I have some cheap land in Florida that I'll sell you (and a free NVidia G84 chip to go along with it..).

    Sorry, but I believe NVidia made a miscalculation, and are now trying to spin their way out of it.

  19. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    November 5, 2009 09:34 AM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by rojmiller View Post
    Ah, no, not a re-brand, but not really new architecture either. This is a die-shrink. Each ATI generation has been new chip design. Within each generation ATI also has die-shrinks similar to this (4770).
    Define "new chip design". There has been no significant change in the ATI architecture since they moved to a unified architecture. The addition of a GDDR5 memory controller and reworking the back-end for DX11 compatibility isn't what I consider a change in architecture.

    The same doesn't really go for Nvidia. The difference between the G80 / G92 and G200 is quite significant. Granted, the GT 240 could still be classified as a derivative of the G92 family but it adds functionality (GDDR5, die shrink, DX10.1) much like ATI has been adding functionality to their chips.

    There is no difference.

  20. SquattingDawg's Avatar
    SquattingDawg

    November 5, 2009 09:37 AM

    I just wish they would quit makin new low end cards and get the damn fermi cards out!!! tired of waitin for it to happen

  21. Soultribunal's Avatar
    Soultribunal

    November 5, 2009 10:11 AM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SquattingDawg View Post
    I just wish they would quit makin new low end cards and get the damn fermi cards out!!! tired of waitin for it to happen
    Much like ATi is experiencing right now, they have to improve yields on these chips before serious manufacturing by board partners can be done.


    ST

  22. martin_metal_88's Avatar
    martin_metal_88

    November 5, 2009 10:35 AM

    8800GT---->9800GT---->GT240??? or have they finally do something new???

  23. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    November 5, 2009 11:38 AM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by martin_metal_88 View Post
    8800GT---->9800GT---->GT240??? or have they finally do something new???
    DX10.1, possibility for GDDR5, higher efficiency, native audio pass-through, less heat, 40nm core, smaller card, etc.

  24. Sushi Warrior's Avatar
    Sushi Warrior

    November 5, 2009 02:29 PM

    My god, does no one notice this is GT215? 9600GT is G94 I believe. Not the same. Really.
    EDIT: My bad, missed half the discussion b/c I missed the whole 2nd page lol.

  25. 5ILVgeARX's Avatar
    5ILVgeARX

    November 5, 2009 04:38 PM

    Its still a cut down G92.

  26. Sushi Warrior's Avatar
    Sushi Warrior

    November 5, 2009 04:44 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by 5ILVgeARX View Post
    Its still a cut down G92.
    Ummm..... where should I start... Someone help me out? I get lost in all of the things that are different. It's a new architecture (GT2xx =/= G9x, believe it or not. Not sure why, the numbers don't match up?) it's a new process (40nm is a SMALLER number than 65nm. Smaller is better in this case) it's faster (96>64, bigger is better this time. You still with me?). It also uses less power (lower is better again, hold onto your chairs ppl) and it also has DX10.1. .1 is a small number, but it is .1 higher still. .1 =/= 0, so there's another change. I do believe I could go on all day.

  27. 5ILVgeARX's Avatar
    5ILVgeARX

    November 5, 2009 05:06 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Sushi Warrior View Post
    Ummm..... where should I start... Someone help me out? I get lost in all of the things that are different. It's a new architecture (GT2xx =/= G9x, believe it or not. Not sure why, the numbers don't match up?) it's a new process (40nm is a SMALLER number than 65nm. Smaller is better in this case) it's faster (96>64, bigger is better this time. You still with me?). It also uses less power (lower is better again, hold onto your chairs ppl) and it also has DX10.1. .1 is a small number, but it is .1 higher still. .1 =/= 0, so there's another change. I do believe I could go on all day.
    Do go on. Don't forget its a 40nm, supports 10.1 .........

    what else was there again?

  28. Sushi Warrior's Avatar
    Sushi Warrior

    November 5, 2009 05:32 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by 5ILVgeARX View Post
    Do go on. Don't forget its a 40nm, supports 10.1 .........

    what else was there again?
    Well for one thing it's a GOD DAMN DIFFERENT CHIP. Anyone have a skull thickness meter? Does it measure over an inch?

  29. 5ILVgeARX's Avatar
    5ILVgeARX

    November 5, 2009 06:47 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Sushi Warrior View Post
    Well for one thing it's a GOD DAMN DIFFERENT CHIP. Anyone have a skull thickness meter? Does it measure over an inch?
    so your saying we should all ditch our 8800gs/9600gso and replace it with this "GOD DAMN DIFFERENT CHIP," pricing estimated at $80-$100 ?

  30. Soultribunal's Avatar
    Soultribunal

    November 5, 2009 06:57 PM

    Alright guys, can we keep this a little more civil. I do not want to have to lock a thread on something I wrote.


    ST

  31. 5ILVgeARX's Avatar
    5ILVgeARX

    November 5, 2009 07:18 PM



    My bad, i got carried away

    I am really not impress with the works of nvidia as of late

  32. belgolas's Avatar
    belgolas

    November 5, 2009 07:18 PM

    Um if this chip is the same as a 8800 GT then I could say that Pentium 3 = Pentium 4 = Core 2 Duo = Core i5 = Core i7 = Core i9

    Really do you think the 2000 series from ATI is THAT much different than the 3000 series? Then could you say the 3000 series is THAT much different from the 4000 series. Then could you say the 4000 series is THAT much different from the 5000 series. So in your guys words 2000 series = 5000 series.

    I don't care who you are but adding DX 10.1 over DX 10 and then adding GDDR5 over 3 means a new GPU name too me. Personally I think the GTX 260 core 216 should have been called the GTX 265. Everyone keeps pointing out pointless accusations at nvidia when ATI is doing the same thing. Who cares not like they are forcing you to buy it.

(32) comments | Add your comments

All About Us
Contact Us
Terms of Use, Privacy
Awards
Help
Community
Forum
Links
YouTube Channel
Syndications
Reviews RSS Feeds
News RSS Feeds
Copyright © 2006-2009, HardwareCanucks.com, HWC, a Division of GTO Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions