Home Reviews Articles News Forums Charts Techwiki Store
  • Latest News

    • XFX Retail GTX480 & GTX 470 Cards Pictured
    • Scythe Launches Yasya CPU Cooler
    • PowerColor Launches HD5770 Eyefinity 5 Card
    • LSI Starts Shipping LSISSS6200 PCI-E Solid State Storage Card
    • NVIDIA Slips in 197.13 BETA Drivers
    • AMD Phenom II X6 “Thuban” Clock Speeds Leaked
    • Southpaws Unite – Razer Develops Unique DeathAdder Gaming Mouse
    • ZOTAC Unleashes World’s First ION Upgrade Kits
  • Latest Reviews

    • XFX Radeon HD 5830 1GB GDDR5 Review
    • Gelid Tranquillo CPU Cooler Review
    • ASUS ROG Rampage III Extreme LGA1366 Motherboard Preview
    • ASUS Crosshair IV Formula AM3 890FX Motherboard Sneak Peak
    • Intel Core i7-980X Gulftown Six-Core 32nm Processor Review
    • ASUS HD 5870 Matrix 2GB & ASUS HD 5870 “V2″ Sneak Peek
    • NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 Roundup (EVGA, Gigabyte, MSI, Sparkle)
    • ASUS RoG Maximus III Extreme LGA 1156 Motherboard Preview
  • Featured Reviews

    • NVIDIA’s GeForce GF100 Under the Microscope
    • Cooler Master 690 II Advanced Case Review
    • Intel Westmere 32nm Launch & Clarkdale Core i5 661 CPU Review
    • 9-Way 850W Power Supply Roundup
    • Kingston SSDNow V Series 40GB SSD Review
    • EVGA P55 FTW LGA1156 Motherboard Review
    • Sapphire Radeon HD 5970 2GB OC Edition Review
    • XFX Radeon HD 5850 1GB GDDR5 Review

ATI Radeon HD 5870 Pictured and Detailed  

Home > News > Video Card News > 
  Bookmark and Share
Posted by FiXT— September 10th, 2009, 11:00 AM


hd5870 2 300x295 ATI Radeon HD 5870 Pictured and DetailedWith September 23rd being the day rumoured for enthusiasts to be on the watch for AMD/ATI’s next generation of video cards, the HD 5870 is getting a lot of attention and the company is finding it difficult to keep the lid shut on leaks.


Their new DirectX11 HD 5870 and 5850 are being eagerly anticipated by consumers as the HD 4000 series is starting to show its age – now being year old technology. With the HD 4870X2 discontinued, it leaves only the modest mid range HD 4890 as  ATI’s top card of the line, giving nVidia exclusive control of the the top end.


According to sources at gathering.tweakers.net and alienbabeltech.com the card is a serious power horse, being able to compete with current dual GPU cards! It is manufactured on the 40nm process and said to boast 1600 Stream processors, double the current HD 4890.

hd5870 2 1 250x300 ATI Radeon HD 5870 Pictured and Detailed


Alienbabeltech expands on this,  ”Amazingly AMD doubled the number of SIMD units from 10 to 20.  Since each SIMD unit contains 16 5-D units and a Quad-TMU overall, that means we count 1600 stream processors and 80 TMUs.  We are talking about a new videocard whose core speed is at 850 MHz and whose 256-bit GDDR5 runs at 1200 MHz“. There will likely be both 1GB and 2GB variants



As the photos show, the monster also includes 3 unique video output options, including DVI, HDMI and Display port. Here is where another cool feature crops up, claimed as “Eyefinity”  said to support up to triple displays at 2560X1600 each, with the most powerful models claimed to support up to six!


All of this is said to pull less than 190watts at full load. And what will all of this set you back? Supposedly less than $399.


The little sibling, the HD 5850 also looks very promising with 1440 SP’s and a clock speed of 700/1000. It is expected to be released with a $299 price tag.  To round out the lineup is the HD 5870X2, dual GPU variant, is expected to be announced around October 20th, 2009 and will be the flagship card, doubling up on all the 5870’s features, and expected to be slapped with a sticker price of $599.


Please keep in mind that all information and photos should be regarded as rumours, however the sources do quote “trusted sources” and have some pretty convincing evidence.


Images Courtesy: gathering.tweakers.net

Source: alienbabeltech


Tags: ATI, hd 5850, hd 5870, hd 5870x2, radeon

Related News

  • An Unknown Companies Radeon HD 5870 and HD 5850 Get Pictured
  • SAPPHIRE Launches HD 5870 and HD 5850
  • GIGABYTE Presents Radeon HD 5800 Series Graphics Cards
  • MSI Introduces the R5870 and R5850 Series Graphics Cards
  • HIS, Club3D, Powercolor and Vertex3D Roll Out ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series Offerings
 

Related Articles

Related Articles

  • An Unknown Companies Radeon HD 5870 and HD 5850 Get Pictured
  • SAPPHIRE Launches HD 5870 and HD 5850
  • GIGABYTE Presents Radeon HD 5800 Series Graphics Cards
  • MSI Introduces the R5870 and R5850 Series Graphics Cards
  • HIS, Club3D, Powercolor and Vertex3D Roll Out ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series Offerings

Comments (75)

  1. 3.0charlie's Avatar
    3.0charlie

    September 10, 2009 11:06 AM

    Damn, the card looks like a Soviet submarine...

    Quote:
    we count 1600 stream processors
    Folding?

  2. mattlef's Avatar
    mattlef

    September 10, 2009 11:11 AM

    Anyone know of the aprox. pricing structure of the 5850's?

  3. FiXT's Avatar
    FiXT

    September 10, 2009 11:19 AM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mattlef View Post
    Anyone know of the aprox. pricing structure of the 5850's?

    Whoops - Pricing for the 5850 and 5870X2 was in a more current revision of the story. Check again at the bottom


    $299 and $599 respectively.

  4. CMetaphor's Avatar
    CMetaphor

    September 10, 2009 11:21 AM

    *drooling*

    Looks like my GTX295 might go one sale... but we'll see how the 300-series from Nvidia stacks up against this.

  5. Cptn Vortex's Avatar
    Cptn Vortex

    September 10, 2009 11:21 AM

    JESUS

  6. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    September 10, 2009 11:22 AM

    I don't know about these cards and Folding. ATI's stream processor implementation has always been inferior to that of Nvidia's on a one versus one basis which is why they need more to get the job done. I would expect no more than a 80% increase in folding capability over a standard HD 4870 which isn't really saying much considering what Nvidia and Intel both have in the pipeline.

  7. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    September 10, 2009 11:24 AM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by FiXT View Post
    $299 and $599 respectively.
    With the HD 5870 slotting in at $399...which is what I have been saying for months now.

  8. CMetaphor's Avatar
    CMetaphor

    September 10, 2009 11:24 AM

    Is it just me, or does the back of this card have two very huge pcie power connectors? I guess Enermax had the inside scoop with their "future-friendly" PSUs cause those connectors look like 2x 10pin or larger (hard to tell).

  9. bojangles's Avatar
    bojangles

    September 10, 2009 11:24 AM

    The Hunt for Red October begins...

    Seriously, that is one damn good looking card. An all red setup would give me an e-boner.

  10. mattlef's Avatar
    mattlef

    September 10, 2009 11:30 AM

    Jesus... I have a 5850 with my name on it, it seems then lol

  11. 3.0charlie's Avatar
    3.0charlie

    September 10, 2009 11:30 AM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    I don't know about these cards and Folding. ATI's stream processor implementation has always been inferior to that of Nvidia's on a one versus one basis which is why they need more to get the job done. I would expect no more than a 80% increase in folding capability over a standard HD 4870 which isn't really saying much considering what Nvidia and Intel both have in the pipeline.
    Nvidia, fine since the 300s are coming, but Intel?

  12. Kilauea's Avatar
    Kilauea

    September 10, 2009 11:32 AM

    Those cards are starting to make me drool, but I've got to wait... Hopefully my 4890 won't get its kicked too bad by those... but then again I hope it does

  13. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    September 10, 2009 11:34 AM

    Can't comment about Intel's plans for the next year. However, I am going to caution ALL of you to hold off on purchasing a card until all the players have shown their hands. I can promise you that ATI will have to drop their pricing faster than you can believe in the month or two following launch.

    You can oogle all you want but if you go and spend $300 on a card that quickly drops to $200, at least I can say: "I told you so".

  14. FiXT's Avatar
    FiXT

    September 10, 2009 11:34 AM

    Larabee!
    Was supposed to debut in 2009, but Intel has its hands full I guess.

    I can't see them offering anything that would compete with the high end nvidia and ati offerings, but I can certainly see some great mid-range cards and awesome prices and some real power house units, great for offloading tasks to... like say oh... folding

  15. 3.0charlie's Avatar
    3.0charlie

    September 10, 2009 11:35 AM

    Then I'll stick to the 260 and 9600GSO for a while, and wait.

  16. mattlef's Avatar
    mattlef

    September 10, 2009 11:36 AM

    whoah whoah whoah...

    Intel GPU?

    And in other words.... you would anticipate massive price drops after launch? seems like a pretty steep prod line life cycle if you ask me... I understand the reasoning with having higher first launch pricing, but damn....

  17. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    September 10, 2009 11:43 AM

    Nvidia did the same thing with their 200-series which were caught with their pants down when the HD 4000-series launched. Luckily, Nvidia partners offered discounts for early adopters after prices shot through the floor. Do you see ATI's board partners doing the same thing when prices take a tumble soon after launch? I'll give you one guess...


    Hint: NO.

  18. Andy's Avatar
    Andy

    September 10, 2009 11:45 AM

    Damn! Murdered out son! I won't be upgrading any time soon, but that does sound promising. Especially the price!

  19. Daygard's Avatar
    Daygard

    September 10, 2009 11:48 AM

    From Anandtech.. AnandTech: Beginnings of the Holodeck: AMD's DX11 GPU, Eyefinity and 6 Display Outputs

    Quote:
    Driving all of this is AMD's next-generation GPU, which will be announced later this month. I didn't leave out any letters, there's a single GPU driving all of these panels. The actual resolution being rendered at is 7680 x 3200; WoW got over 80 fps with the details maxed.

  20. CMetaphor's Avatar
    CMetaphor

    September 10, 2009 11:51 AM

    Im actually not allowed to comment. Ha ha! NDAs suck...

  21. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    September 10, 2009 11:52 AM

    Interesting article, but who wants to pay $6000+ for 6 monitors? And imagine the shipping charges. Another $500+?

  22. mattlef's Avatar
    mattlef

    September 10, 2009 11:53 AM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Nvidia did the same thing with their 200-series which were caught with their pants down when the HD 4000-series launched. Luckily, Nvidia partners offered discounts for early adopters after prices shot through the floor. Do you see ATI's board partners doing the same thing when prices take a tumble soon after launch? I'll give you one guess...


    Hint: NO.
    I see your point, but wouldn't it be a bit more intelligent if ATi decided to go after the early adopters with a more competitive entry price? I mean Diffusion of innovation be damned in this model. It does make business sense to apply the standard model, but say if they were planning on dropping the prices when Nvidia counters, wouldn't it be just as justifiable to launch at said "post-green launch" prices? You gain the upper hand in the price war right away and develop a strategic competitive advantage in the eyes of the consumer. (Perceived Value is king in this market no?)

  23. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    September 10, 2009 12:00 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mattlef View Post
    I see your point, but wouldn't it be a bit more intelligent if ATi decided to go after the early adopters with a more competitive entry price? I mean Diffusion of innovation be damned in this model. It does make business sense to apply the standard model, but say if they were plannin on dropping the prices when Nvidia counters, wouldn't it be just as justifyable to lauch at said "post-green launch" prices? You gain the upper hand in the price war right away and develop a strategic compeditive advantage in the eyes of the consumer.
    I agree. Howeverm we also have to remember that the early adopters are also the ones sporting the loudest voices when it comes to bitching about something they don't like. Namely: price.

    What I am saying here is what I say EVERY time a new card is launched:

    1) Don't expect it to perform miracles considering even the $200 cards of today can play literally any game at 60FPS+++ at 2560 x 1600 resolution with AA enabled. No to mention that there won't be any DX11 games for the next few months either.

    2) Because of my #1 statement, people should be more than willing to at least wait a few months until Nvidia shows their hand.

  24. r0bc's Avatar
    r0bc

    September 10, 2009 12:01 PM

    My last ATI card was a 8mb rage pro,but it sure looks nice.
    Can't wait to see what Nvidia has....should be good we hope.

  25. Frank Encruncher's Avatar
    Frank Encruncher

    September 10, 2009 12:07 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Interesting article, but who wants to pay $6000+ for 6 monitors? And imagine the shipping charges. Another $500+?
    How about 24?
    XtremeSystems Forums - View Single Post - Radeon HD 5870 Six with 6 display outputs, prices, performance

  26. BIGFREAK's Avatar
    BIGFREAK

    September 10, 2009 12:20 PM

    2 words

    STOKED STOKEDER

  27. Jackquelegs's Avatar
    Jackquelegs

    September 10, 2009 12:36 PM

    I need new pants

  28. Daygard's Avatar
    Daygard

    September 10, 2009 01:08 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Interesting article, but who wants to pay $6000+ for 6 monitors? And imagine the shipping charges. Another $500+?
    From the same article.

    Quote:
    The idea isn't to pick up six 30" displays but perhaps add a third 20" panel to your existing setup, or buy five $150 displays to build the ultimate gaming setup. Even using 1680 x 1050 displays in a 5x1 arrangement (ideal for first person shooters apparently, since you get a nice wrap around effect) still nets you a 8400 x 1050 display. If you want more vertical real estate, switch over to a 3x2 setup and then you're at 5040 x 2100. That's more resolution for less than most high end 30" panels.
    The point wasn't that everybody should go get 6x30" but that one GPU is running 7680 x 3200 res at high FPS

  29. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    September 10, 2009 01:26 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Daygard View Post
    The point wasn't that everybody should go get 6x30" but that one GPU is running 7680 x 3200 res at high FPS
    It is playing WoW. 'nuff said.

    Three monitors? Matrox already does that quite well.

    I understand that this is an interesting tech demo but to me it looks like e-peen waving from ATI once again for a technology that will only see limited release. Other examples in this category:

    - Havok on their GPUs
    - The disaster that is now ATI's Stream
    - The "revival" of the All in Wonder cards. Very limited release until MONTHS after release / reviews.
    - Proper support for their FireGL series of cards. Trust me, I'm still waiting.

    One way or another, the standard HD 5800-series will include the usual 2 DVIs and maybe a single displayport if we are lucky. What you are looking at is a niche product / tech demonstrator which will cost substantially more than a standard card.

  30. Putz's Avatar
    Putz

    September 10, 2009 03:18 PM

    the new cards look nice, i just hope they are quiet

  31. jcmaz's Avatar
    jcmaz

    September 10, 2009 04:09 PM

    Dude, 6X30 inch monitors are CRAZY!!! Now image 6 1080P projectors!!! DROOLZ...

  32. Arinoth's Avatar
    Arinoth

    September 10, 2009 04:12 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by 3.0charlie View Post
    Damn, the card looks like a Soviet submarine...

    Folding?
    Dive, dive, dive.

    I'd want to see some benchmark folding as well as what nVidia has in their 300 series before making any real "jumps" for folding

  33. Dr_BenD_over's Avatar
    Dr_BenD_over

    September 10, 2009 04:15 PM

    Fortunately, my 4770's handle everything I can throw at them, and I have no money, so I can wait things out.

  34. ddude27's Avatar
    ddude27

    September 10, 2009 05:28 PM

    Just wait....Honestly like SKY said most of the cards can pull of +60fps not to mention that direct x 11 won't be implemented into games a few months after. Also, price cuts are going to happen making it better to decide.....

  35. jcmaz's Avatar
    jcmaz

    September 10, 2009 05:29 PM

    how bout Dirt 2? Some say its DX11???

  36. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    September 10, 2009 05:37 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by jcmaz View Post
    how bout Dirt 2? Some say its DX11???
    So? Release date: December.

  37. geokilla's Avatar
    geokilla

    September 10, 2009 06:15 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by 3.0charlie View Post
    Folding?
    I doubt it'd be faster than NVIDIA's GTX260 in Folding...

    As for AnandTech saying that it got over 80FPS in WoW, everyone says that WoW is more CPU dependent than GPU dependent....

    @CM. It's a forum, we're allowed to discuss? Lol

  38. mattlef's Avatar
    mattlef

    September 10, 2009 07:11 PM

    Doesnt it kinda seem like just yesterday DX 10 was the next big thing... and now we're already getting dx11 titles coming out.....

  39. Sagath's Avatar
    Sagath

    September 10, 2009 07:42 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mattlef View Post
    Doesnt it kinda seem like just yesterday DX 10 was the next big thing... and now we're already getting dx11 titles coming out.....
    Yeah. DX10. The next big thing

  40. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    September 10, 2009 08:23 PM

    Actually, the developers we talked to have stated that they expect DX11 implementation into games to be slower than DX10 was.

  41. jwebby's Avatar
    jwebby

    September 10, 2009 08:53 PM

    Glad to see ATI giving nVidia a run for their money!

  42. belgolas's Avatar
    belgolas

    September 10, 2009 08:56 PM

    I think I read somewhere that DX11 will be implemented into some current games and some current cards will support some of the features in DX11. But that could just be false information....

  43. Frank Encruncher's Avatar
    Frank Encruncher

    September 10, 2009 09:58 PM

    I want see how many fps you get at those resolutions



    Just imagine if this worked with 3D glasses
    (Quake III Arena)

  44. JMCD's Avatar
    JMCD

    September 11, 2009 12:22 AM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Frank Encruncher View Post
    I want see how many fps you get at those resolutions



    Just imagine if this worked with 3D glasses
    (Quake III Arena)
    I think crysis at that resolution would cause some sort of explosion :P
    These look nice, but I agree with Sky, see what nvidia has in store as well. I may be buying a new comp in the next few weeks, but I'll just be grabbing a 260GTX at best, until the new cards are released.

  45. Safearus's Avatar
    Safearus

    September 11, 2009 05:14 AM

    I just bought a GTX275... And It'll be gone if the 300 series completely blows it outta the water. However I am an nVidia fan. And I'll admit it even with my AMD processor.

  46. SKYMTL's Avatar
    SKYMTL

    September 11, 2009 05:25 AM

    Does your GTX 275 play all the current games? Yes

    Does your GTX 275 have at least 6 months left in the tank? Yes

    Will your GTX 275 play most of if not all of the upcoming games? Yes

    If you answered yes to all of these questions, you are totally fine with your GTX 275. ;)

  47. bojangles's Avatar
    bojangles

    September 11, 2009 05:28 AM

    LOL that 8x3 setup can only get 15 fps on quake 3. Shame...:P

  48. Chilly's Avatar
    Chilly

    September 11, 2009 09:45 AM

    Hopefully EYEfinity pans out, because if so, then I have some shopping plans.

  49. amdhehe's Avatar
    amdhehe

    September 11, 2009 10:24 AM

    Judging from all the hints SKY has been dropping, I would say it might be a good idea to hold off on buying this card until we see the competition.
    It's as if he knows something we don't.... but isn't allowed to say it.

  50. Cowboy's Avatar
    Cowboy

    September 11, 2009 10:45 AM

    I wish I had "sources"...

  51. belgolas's Avatar
    belgolas

    September 11, 2009 10:52 AM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by amdhehe View Post
    Judging from all the hints SKY has been dropping, I would say it might be a good idea to hold off on buying this card until we see the competition.
    It's as if he knows something we don't.... but isn't allowed to say it.
    Well it is wise to hold out and wait for both sides to release their cards. If anything it would lower the price. He is right that a high end GPU can play most games at high res max quality. There are a few games that not even my system can max out but I am going to wait till at least boxing day sale. So far there is nothing to get too excited about. There are no DX11 Crysis 2's and DX 11 isn't officially out yet. Personally the waiting game will be worth it this time.

  52. Squeetard's Avatar
    Squeetard

    September 11, 2009 11:05 AM

    We are hitting a point of diminishing need for this extra hardware horsepower. My oc'ed 260 plays everytyhing out there maxed.

  53. CMetaphor's Avatar
    CMetaphor

    September 11, 2009 11:13 AM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Squeetard View Post
    We are hitting a point of diminishing need for this extra hardware horsepower. My oc'ed 260 plays everytyhing out there maxed.
    I don't agree. With LCD panels dropping in prices and more and more panels pushing higher resolutions into the same size frames, games that used to play buttery smooth will start to slow down noticeably. Pretty soon everyone and their cousin is going to want to play on 30'' panels or triplewide setups. hehe

  54. belgolas's Avatar
    belgolas

    September 11, 2009 05:28 PM

    I agree. 2560 x 1600 is a very large jump in pixels and clarity. It is double the pixels from 1920 x 1200. I have a 24" monitor for my other rig and a 30" monitor for my main rig. Side by side there is an incredible difference. Games look sharper and you can view more at the same time. At 2560 x 1600 you can not max out every game. And when I talk about maxed out that means full resolution with all eye candy turned on with at least 4x AA. So I can list off a bunch of games that can not be 60 fps or above on my rig but I don't want to right now. (I am at the hospital)

  55. Chilly's Avatar
    Chilly

    September 11, 2009 06:45 PM



    I know its only an ES and chances are high(pretty much 99%) that they will be manufactured in China, but seeing "Made in Canada" on ATi's latest KICKASS GPU brings a tear to my eye(finity).

  56. mattlef's Avatar
    mattlef

    September 11, 2009 06:55 PM

    lol nice finds Chilly...

  57. b1lk1's Avatar
    b1lk1

    September 12, 2009 07:09 AM

    30" and 2560X1600 resolution is the only possible monitor that needs more horsepower right now. My HD4830 handles any game out there at 1920X1200. I am not saying it maxxes them all out, but there is no game out that I cannot set to run smoothly with decent settings with my current PC configuration.

  58. Cowboy's Avatar
    Cowboy

    September 12, 2009 07:37 AM

    My logic is thus:

    I cannot afford a 30" monitor
    I do not need extreme performance at my current resolution
    Therefore, I do not need the new series of graphics cards and I cannot afford a setup that does.

    Lets just hope my logic holds true when these things hit store shelves :)

  59. jcmaz's Avatar
    jcmaz

    September 12, 2009 07:39 AM

    my 9600GT does 1080 res well without aa and in med to high settings (GRID)

  60. artistpavel's Avatar
    artistpavel

    September 12, 2009 01:11 PM

    One more vote for 2560X1600 as the main reason to upgrade, currently there's no solution be it single card or SLI that can run all games maxed with at least 4MSAA. Still haven't played through Crysis, first I didn't have good enough GPU to run it, once I got proper card, resolution went up, hope next card will nail it on a head.

  61. Schnerf's Avatar
    Schnerf

    September 12, 2009 01:34 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by jwebby View Post
    Glad to see ATI giving nVidia a run for their money!
    I highly doubt that for what my opinion is worth. From a strategical point of view, this might not really give Ati much advantage. With my great mind reading abilities I think we should all keep our pants on until nVidia shows us their love.

  62. artistpavel's Avatar
    artistpavel

    September 13, 2009 08:07 PM

    Card looks huge, 12" or something, not gonna fit in my main case (ironically will fit in HTPC case, where its' not needed).

  63. Jackquelegs's Avatar
    Jackquelegs

    September 13, 2009 08:18 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Schnerf View Post
    I highly doubt that for what my opinion is worth. From a strategical point of view, this might not really give Ati much advantage. With my great mind reading abilities I think we should all keep our pants on until nVidia shows us their love.
    These cards along with the rest of ATi's lineup will give Nvidia a run for their money for sure. Remember that the GPU market is not based upon who can put out the fastest and most expensive card. Rather, the winner is the company that can make their cards most accessible to the general public. Yes, I'm sure Nvidia can make a card that eats 400W by itself, and get over 60fps on Crysis that costs 799$. Ask yourself though on how many people will actually buy that.

    So far the ATi's low-mid lineup is quite dominant, and from the looks of RV870, that trend should be able to continue.

    Lastly, ATi's early release is going to impact the psychological war on GPUs. Even IF Nvidia can put out the fastest card on the planet, they'll be coming later (from the looks of it..a few months). Getting this gap between release and competition is quite crucial.

  64. mchutch's Avatar
    mchutch

    September 14, 2009 01:37 AM

    I think ATI has bounced back nicely but Nvidia has new stuff out sooner than you think. Some do not even know they have GTX300 stuff, mostly mobile but the big guns are coming right after the new ATI.

    I have 2 GTX 260 Core 216 OC'd but am still intrigued in the 5870...maybe one after I go X58 or P55. It will be nice to have both SLi and Xfire options in case ATI has a big beaver coming out.

  65. BobbyLou's Avatar
    BobbyLou

    September 14, 2009 11:15 AM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mchutch View Post
    I think ATI has bounced back nicely but Nvidia has new stuff out sooner than you think. Some do not even know they have GTX300 stuff, mostly mobile but the big guns are coming right after the new ATI.

    I have 2 GTX 260 Core 216 OC'd but am still intrigued in the 5870...maybe one after I go X58 or P55. It will be nice to have both SLi and Xfire options in case ATI has a big beaver coming out.
    considering that a 5870 is faster then 2x 260 216s i would be too!!

  66. mattlef's Avatar
    mattlef

    September 14, 2009 02:01 PM

    I hope you guys are ready for these numbers:







    ............
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    new pants may be needed....

  67. Full Speed's Avatar
    Full Speed

    September 14, 2009 04:02 PM

    Those numbers look very interesting. Almost makes me want to get a 5870 (besides the fact that I want to use 3D vision on my next PC). See what the GTX300 series does I guess.

  68. JMCD's Avatar
    JMCD

    September 14, 2009 04:10 PM

    Good god, what a jump.

  69. Sagath's Avatar
    Sagath

    September 14, 2009 04:39 PM

    Are those numbers really that impressive? It seems to be (generally speaking) the 5870 is a 'better' gtx295 only at Ultra-high resolutions. The same applies for a 5850 vs 285 (why didnt they use the 275 I wonder? Hrm).

    Just goes to show that last gens top end are still equal to the new gens midrange, again, if you ask this guy.

  70. artistpavel's Avatar
    artistpavel

    September 14, 2009 04:46 PM

    It looks like my favorite games only get 5-10 FPS boost. GTX 300 better get higher results to get my money.

  71. ipaine's Avatar
    ipaine

    September 14, 2009 05:34 PM

    Yea, I am not overly impressed with those numbers. I mean sure they are better, but not by a huge margin. Plus lets face it almost all of those are playable framerates, even on the "old" cards.

  72. 5ILVgeARX's Avatar
    5ILVgeARX

    September 14, 2009 08:07 PM

    but the launch price is $299-$399

    the 5850 $299 = GTX 285 $299 (current price)

    the 5870 $399 = GTX 295 $499 (current price)


    those ATI prices will likely take a dive after the launch of the gtx 3xx series.


    but the question now is; will nvidia put out a monster card like back in the 8800gtx days or will they crash and burn since there trying to rush the gtx 3xx into releasing this year.

    Only time will tell

    don't quote me, i am just stating whats in my mind right now

  73. ToXic's Avatar
    ToXic

    September 14, 2009 08:28 PM

    i hope this comes with a box of tissues, some lotion and maybe a condom... thats right ATI bend over

  74. Killswitch's Avatar
    Killswitch

    September 14, 2009 08:40 PM

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mattlef View Post
    I hope you guys are ready for these numbers:




    new pants may be needed....
    That pic is hilariously perfect! 5870's in CF look to be a definite nut buster.

    BTW, where did you find those numbers?

  75. Chilly's Avatar
    Chilly

    September 14, 2009 08:43 PM

    More hawt pictures!!!!


    Click Image to Enlarge


    Click Image to Enlarge

  76. Cowboy's Avatar
    Cowboy

    September 14, 2009 10:08 PM

    that's a 10.5" card right there.

(75) comments | Add your comments

All About Us
Contact Us
Terms of Use, Privacy
Awards
Help
Community
Forum
Links
YouTube Channel
Syndications
Reviews RSS Feeds
News RSS Feeds
Copyright © 2006-2009, HardwareCanucks.com, HWC, a Division of GTO Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions