Microsoft Security Essentials, Microsoft Corp.’s new no-cost, core anti-malware service that helps protect consumers against viruses, spyware and other malicious software, will be available Tuesday, Sept. 29.
Microsoft Security Essentials, independently certified by West Coast Labs, is backed by the company’s global security response team and is built on the same award-winning core security technology found in the company’s security solutions for businesses. It requires no registration, trials or renewals and will be available for download directly from Microsoft at http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials
“Consumers have told us that they want the protection of real-time security software but we know that too many are either unwilling or unable to pay for it, and so end up unprotected,” said Amy Barzdukas, general manager for consumer security at Microsoft. “With Microsoft Security Essentials, consumers can get high-quality protection that is easy to get and easy to use — and it won’t get in their way.”
Making Microsoft Security Essentials broadly available as a free consumer download for genuine Windows-based PCs is part of Microsoft’s ongoing commitment to provide a more trustworthy computing experience for all customers. By making Microsoft Security Essentials easy to get and easy to use, Microsoft hopes to encourage broader adoption of anti-virus protection across the consumer audience, which in turn will help increase security across the entire Windows ecosystem. For business customers, Microsoft continues to offer Forefront Client Security, providing centralized, comprehensive management and reporting capabilities.
Maximum Security, Minimum Resource Requirements
Microsoft Security Essentials is designed to run quietly in the background alerting users only when there is an action for them to take. It also limits CPU and memory usage, resulting in less impact on the tasks consumers perform every day such as opening documents or browser windows or loading search results, even on older or less powerful PCs. Microsoft Security Essentials uses real-time protection to help prevent PCs from becoming infected, and it is the first Microsoft security product to make use of the company’s new Dynamic Signature Service, a technology that helps ensure users stay protected by the most current virus definitions available without having to wait for the next scheduled download.
“Microsoft is focused on the challenges that prevent consumers from running up-to-date anti-virus software today, particularly in emerging markets where there is a growing prevalence of malware,” said Jon Crotty, security analyst at IDC. “With Microsoft Security Essentials, Microsoft is helping to reduce some of the barriers that constrain consumers from running AV.”
Microsoft Security Essentials will be available for Windows XP SP2 or SP3, Windows Vista and Windows 7 including Windows XP mode on both x32 and x64 PCs.
Source: Microsoft
Tags: anti virus, Microsoft, security essentials

September 29, 2009 11:50 AM
So, what do we know about this product? Any good?
September 29, 2009 11:54 AM
Why doesn't Microsoft just patch up all the holes in their OS and executables/.jscripts/etc. and release it as security patches weekly/daily instead of having to run extra software on the side that bogs down resources.

This will not deter me from buying a yearly subscription to NOD32.
September 29, 2009 11:54 AM
Wayyyyy overdue. But I'm glad they are making this available for free. I'm interested to see how it compares to AVG Free or Avast!...
September 29, 2009 12:05 PM
One of the benefits I can see for using a microsoft product is that they'd be able to integrate the AV with IE to keep those nasty browser bugs out.
In all honesty, true virus' aren't the most common issue, it's "rogue AV" like Personal Antivirus (Personal Antivirus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) which infect most computers and those have to be blocked at the browser level as they get in by tricking folks into giving them permission to install.
September 29, 2009 12:09 PM
I'm downloading it right now to test it out. I like free AV but they are ALWAYS bloated.
I use NOD32 on my main pc, but I don't want to be paying for multiple licenses and a lot of friends don't want to have to shell out the money for an AV - thinking that AVG is just fine. I'm sure it is, but I want something that doesn't require more system resources than Crysis <.<
Hopefully this will be a light weight and simple AV that still is able to be effective
September 29, 2009 12:51 PM
This will not deter me from buying a yearly subscription to NOD32.
September 29, 2009 02:09 PM
I was on Kaspersky for a couple years and it worked very well. Now I have actually gone to the dark side and installed Norton Internet Security... reason being that independent reports found it used less resources than Nod, Kaspersky and others... and was just as effective. I think Symantec finally got the hint that there AV software was garbage and they decided to do something about it.
September 29, 2009 02:14 PM
The new Norton...... likely doesn't even do any AV at all, and has the same effectiveness as the old Norton.... just uses half the cpu time!
September 29, 2009 02:33 PM
Amen to that but when i worked at best buy we still have to tell costumers it smelled like roses
September 29, 2009 03:04 PM
Sticking with my KIS 2010 here. ^^
That said, any reports on Microsoft Security Essential? It's gotta be better than One Care.
September 29, 2009 03:54 PM
I, like EVERYONE else, hated Norton. But I read and heard so many good things about the new Norton that I had to see for myself. I downloaded the trial and was pleasantly pleased... so I gave them my money. I am more than happy to reward a company for doing something right after failing for so long.
Check out this report from AV Comparitives.
http://www.av-comparatives.org/image...c_report22.pdf
^^ This is basically what turned me onto Norton after a good friend of mine blasted my ear off for 20 minutes on how much they improved their product. Oh look, it even beat out ESET and Kaspersky in most tests and the final rating so
September 29, 2009 03:58 PM
Avast does it for me. I will wait a bit before trusting Microsoft for my AV needs, and will give the new Norton a look-over (I will try to keep an open mind, but its hard to jump on that ship again).
September 29, 2009 04:01 PM
Nod32 + Avira + Malwarebytes + SAS + sandboxie for me :)
September 29, 2009 04:05 PM
The main reason I applaud this move is that it's going to offer an option to "the great unwashed" who wouldn't know a legit freeware app from a rogue AV and who more than likely will never consider using any browser other than IE.
Like it or not, that's 90% + of the non-corporate PC market.
September 29, 2009 04:20 PM
The main reason I applaud this move is that it's going to offer an option to "the great unwashed" who wouldn't know a legit freeware app from a rogue AV and who more than likely will never consider using any browser other than IE.
Like it or not, that's 90% + of the non-corporate PC market.
September 29, 2009 04:23 PM
I'll stick with NOD and common sense.
September 29, 2009 05:43 PM
Actually I tried MSE during the beta stages, and it seemed like a nice simple GUI with minimal resource usage. How it actually performs detection wise, who knows, but I would hope it compares with most other Free AV software.

I'm also assuming MS wants you to pair this up with Defender to get the whole AV + Malware package.
However on that note, Avast 5 Beta looks rather stunning too and they have a solid track record. I typically put Avast on all PCs I build/fix since it's free and usually rates decently. I do despise of the GUI though as it's horrible to use.
Personally, I have no AV on my PC. Don't do any scans of sorts either. And guess what? I have no oddities on my PC. I think people just need to learn2internet
September 29, 2009 05:44 PM
Just wait until you try and uninstall it
Truth be told though, I set my parents up with the latest Norton as it was what they were used to, it was simple and effective for what they needed. It pained me to do so, but they are one of the top companies when it comes to AV - They just aren't as dedicated to improving the program in the area that many computer users want.
September 29, 2009 05:45 PM
Symantec.com/autotools look for Norton Removal Tool..... ;)
September 29, 2009 06:56 PM
I read some reviews and they say Security Essentials did not record any false positives, and received a perfect score overall in detecting and cleaning rootkits and malware infection. In one case it detected and removed a Trojan downloader that NOD32 even failed to detect. Thats impressive.
I've got AVG licenses but I'm going to try this when I get off my arse and upgrade everything to Windows 7.
I wonder what the Anti-virus company's think of this.
September 29, 2009 09:14 PM
I, like EVERYONE else, hated Norton. But I read and heard so many good things about the new Norton that I had to see for myself..... blah blah blah, etc etc etc....
Viruses aren't even viruses anymore.... they're all con artist scams nowadays, it seems.
September 29, 2009 09:14 PM
Truth be told though, I set my parents up with the latest Norton as it was what they were used to, it was simple and effective for what they needed. It pained me to do so, but they are one of the top companies when it comes to AV - They just aren't as dedicated to improving the program in the area that many computer users want.
Viruses aren't even viruses anymore.... they're all con artist scams nowadays, it seems.
And I do know what I am talking about. So ya fanboy, as per your previous comment weighing me down with wisdom and enlightenment based on ... ... oh wait that's right, based on nothing except fanaticism.
********************************
Having said all that, I will definitely check out MSE at some point. I am not opposed to free solutions, I just haven't found one I particularly like yet.
September 29, 2009 09:24 PM
meh, i don't have anti-virus' on any of my computers. The only time i've had a virus is when i was way younger and wasn't very smart about where i browsed, and i think they came from programs like kazaa or limewire
September 29, 2009 09:43 PM
September 29, 2009 09:54 PM
Smart move by microsoft.
No doubt in my mind this was timed to coincide with the release of Windows 7. It's only going to be available for folks with "genuine" versions, and it's the kind of "value added" feature that might make a lot of folks running hacked versions of XP think about finally making the plunge by purchasing a legit copy of Windows.
I was pleasantly surprised to see that it's also being offered for XP users. Before I grabbed a peek, I had a sneaking suspicion that it might be a Vista/Win7 only feature to get folks to upgrade.
Makes great financial sense for folks who don't know a lot about keeping their computers secure and who normally purchase a yearly license. I've always thought it was a bit cheezy that the big security suites required you to purchase a new license every year anywise....
September 29, 2009 10:06 PM
So I'm impressed that my words weigh so heavily on you. I'm not sure why they do, considering I was poking fun at Norton, not you.
Now my wisdom and enlightenment is not based on nothing.
Norton was a steaming pile of shit. Everyone knows that. McAffe is right behind them. They are the reasons why I don't run any AV software. I started off with Norton. The only time I was impressed is when I uninstalled it and my machine was so much faster.
Furthermore, you're calling me a fanboy of.... of... nothing. I'm not a fan of Norton, and have poked fun at it and now I'm a fanboy. Of nothing.
And I'm fanatical.
You need to calm down, I think.
September 30, 2009 04:17 AM
I've been using MSE for months. After my NOD32 subscription gave up I decided to try it out and I've had no problems. It took a few seconds to install, uses little to no resources, scans extremely quickly, and never does a scan when I'm actually using the PC. At first it used to do be a little annoying asking for updates all the time, but now MSE updates are integrated with Windows Update. I've also read plenty of reviews where they test the detection rate and nothing got past it, giving little to no false positives.
September 30, 2009 08:58 AM
So I'm impressed that my words weigh so heavily on you. I'm not sure why they do, considering I was poking fun at Norton, not you.
Now my wisdom and enlightenment is not based on nothing.
Norton was a steaming pile of shit. Everyone knows that. McAffe is right behind them. They are the reasons why I don't run any AV software. I started off with Norton. The only time I was impressed is when I uninstalled it and my machine was so much faster.
Furthermore, you're calling me a fanboy of.... of... nothing. I'm not a fan of Norton, and have poked fun at it and now I'm a fanboy. Of nothing.
And I'm fanatical.
You need to calm down, I think.
September 30, 2009 10:29 AM
September 30, 2009 12:52 PM
So... yes I whole heartedly agree. From what I have read and seen, MSE looks like a perfect solution for the average user. It's free, integrates well with all current Windows OS's, has a nice simple UI, has enough control for more advanced users and seems to carry a small footprint. And if its detection is anywhere as good as other free solutions I think MS will have a real winner.
September 30, 2009 01:14 PM
It seems fine so far. It's not stupid retarded like AVG, which is good. I run remote admin on my XP machine here and wanted to see how it fared. It's not near as intrusive and it's able to back off when you ask it to, something that seems to be a challenge with AVG.
September 30, 2009 01:23 PM
So after getting screwed by norton for 10 years with thier innefectual buggy bloatware, we should all go rushing out to hand them more of our cash because they finally made a piece of crap that doesn't stink?
No thanks, but it is good to know that if I have 10 bad iTrader ratings, as long as the last one is good, you'll still buy from me. Sucker.
September 30, 2009 01:42 PM
So after getting screwed by norton for 10 years with thier innefectual buggy bloatware, we should all go rushing out to hand them more of our cash because they finally made a piece of crap that doesn't stink?
No thanks, but it is good to know that if I have 10 bad iTrader ratings, as long as the last one is good, you'll still buy from me. Sucker.
No, not at all.
The reply you quoted was aimed at Perenium's comment, which basically said the new Norton wouldn't do any AV catching at all. When actually Norton has always been pretty good at catching stuff, just the software itself was bloated, slow etc etc.
Do what you want but I liked the idea of spending $50 for 3 Norton licenses, as opposed to $80+ for ESET whose results actually came in lower than Norton's in the report I linked from AV-Comparitives.
Edit: Look at it this way. You use Windows right? I am sure there are a whole mess of reasons why Windows can be considered old, bloated, slow, expensive, buggy, unreliable... shall I go on. There are other alternatives to Windows, but somehow version after version, and let's not talk about the launch of Vista O.O ... you still keep buying it. So I guess that makes you a sucker too. :)
September 30, 2009 01:45 PM
I like the idea of spending $0 on something every bit as good as either of those.
September 30, 2009 01:47 PM
October 6, 2009 09:03 AM
personally for me. I use Avast. I go here for ratings.
ICSA Labs
October 6, 2009 03:09 PM
I don't have an AV installed but I may install microsofts free one. I have gone years without an AV and have never had a problem. I used to buy and pay for AV but it is a waste for me. Besides I don't have that much of stuff that is important so I don't care. But this one from Microsoft may get me to install it.
October 7, 2009 04:15 AM
Pulled this little handy tidbit from the official microsoft security website....... (Rogue Security Software ? Microsoft Security)
Customers should call 1-866-PC Safety for phone support which is available 24 hours a day 7 days a week.
October 7, 2009 05:28 AM
I can say from first hand experience now that this software is very nice and easy to use, and its already cleaned up a really gummed up virus infected computer from a client.
Its not often I praise Microsoft for their software, but in this particular case (as well as LiveOneCare) its very good.
ST
October 7, 2009 07:55 AM
Same here. Installed it on my 32 bit win7 htpc and my 64 bit win7 gamer/work pc. Nice and light. Used it on an infected clients computer and it found 4 trojans that my previous favorite scanner missed.
October 7, 2009 10:07 AM
Sounds promising! *Checks Norton subscription date* Damn I've got a ways to go still. :\