Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE > Video Cards

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old June 30, 2016, 05:46 AM
ern88's Avatar
Allstar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 722

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenor View Post
Not that i would say eveyone should do that but wow, that is impressive to get that kinda of speed out of the 480 with better cooling. I wonder what Water cooling will be able to do?
Here check this video out for liquid cooled RX 480

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uvhyrz5oDPo
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old June 30, 2016, 07:22 AM
Fudd Rucker's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SSM Ont
Posts: 1,088

My System Specs

Default

Seems these things are pulling a lot of juice from the PCI-E 12v pins. A lot more than they should be. Overclocking and xfire might not be a good idea afterall.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comment...specification/
__________________
I couldnt think of something snarky or interesting to put here this time around.
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old June 30, 2016, 09:15 AM
SKYMTL's Avatar
HardwareCanuck Review Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 13,603
Default

No overclocking anymore here. After buying a PCI-E riser card and a clamp meter on my way home yesterday from vacation and logging almost 100W draw when this thing is overclocked, NO WAY I am running it on my board. I'll wait for board partner cards thank you.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old June 30, 2016, 09:20 AM
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,554

My System Specs

Default

Out of curiosity have you run any of the recent NVIDIA offerings on the same riser card and recorded power draw?
__________________
heatware
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old June 30, 2016, 09:27 AM
sswilson's Avatar
Moderator
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 16,887

My System Specs

Default

How big of an engineering job would it have been to incorporate a single 8 pin as opposed to the 6? I'm sure it's not something that could be retroactively fixed on all current cards, but is it something that could relatively easily be resolved on a V 2.0 reference card?

If they haven't already been, somebody should be fired for this decision....

I've seen first hand what drawing too much current through the board can do back in my GPU farming days. :)
__________________
Gigabyte Z97N-WIFI / i7 4770K / 2X 8G Gskill 1866 Sniper / XFX XTR 750 / EVGA GTX 970 SSC ACX 2.0+
AZZA Titan 240 / Custom WC / Intel 730 Series 480GB SSD / Seagate Barracuda 1TB / Dell UltraSharp U2412M

Asrock AM1H-ITX / AM1 Athlon 5350 / 1X4G Gskill PC3-14900 / Intel 6235 Wi-Fi / 90W Targus Power Brick / Uncased 256GB Sandisk Z400S SSD / Mini-Box M350 / 24" Westinghouse L2410NM
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old June 30, 2016, 09:34 AM
ern88's Avatar
Allstar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 722

My System Specs

Default

AMD Radeon RX 400 series naming scheme explained | VideoCardz.com

If you check this article out. There will be some kind of revision on the RX cards.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old June 30, 2016, 10:19 AM
"Quote This..."
F@H
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hell
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lysrin View Post
OK Squeetard, I must be missing something here. The HWC review gave it a Conclusion titled "New High Water Mark" and a Damn Good Value award. The other reviews I have seen (small sample, but still) are saying things like the RX480 puts AMD in a good position for the mainstream market (AnandTech) and best budget graphics card (Ars Technica). Even Tom's Hardware review conclusion seems generally favourable saying that they appreciate that AMD has achieved "the combination of smaller, faster, cooler and quieter, all for less money".

So that's just like, their opinion man :)
None of that says anything positive to me. Maybe if you actually don't even own a gpu this would be a good choice to start? Considering only price.
Massive die shrink (2x!) and nothing to show for it. That's all I see when I read all the reviews. And performance per watt is abysmal. The 1070 consumes only 5 watts more at load (1%) and is almost twice as fast, severe WTF here?
So now AMD has to shoot themselves in the foot again on pricing just to move some of these.

Keep in mind I have been running 7970's in xfire for almost 3 years now, longer than any other gpu I've ever owned, pleased with them.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old June 30, 2016, 11:16 AM
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ern88 View Post
AMD Radeon RX 400 series naming scheme explained | VideoCardz.com

If you check this article out. There will be some kind of revision on the RX cards.
The GF 14LPP process seems to be a major problem for AMD as there is so much variation among even reviewer samples. Some cannot even hit the advertised 1266 Mhz clocks in games without increasing fan speed.

AMD RX 480 review: The best budget graphics card—but for how long? | Ars Technica

AMD is stuck with the worst foundry for their products. If Vega and Zen are built at GF 14LPP then AMD is pretty much dead. AMD better push GF to get their process problems resolved asap or they should sue GF to get out of WSA. I am wondering how Polaris would have been if it had been manufactured at TSMC 16FF+. I would think that it would have hit 1.4 Ghz clocks while keeping power well below 150w. The problem with GF is they have the worst implementation possible of Samsung 14LPP. AMD can do nothing but just cringe in revulsion. I am thinking AMD won't last long as the bleeding will continue and AMD will run out of cash.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old June 30, 2016, 03:32 PM
Coach's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Morden MB
Posts: 1,066

My System Specs

Default

Is it that simple? Could it also be that AMD did not have the resources to refine Polaris to the extent that Nvidia did with Pascal to achieve their clocks? I am no expert and I do not know how fabs re spin silicon, I do not know how those changes are made only that Nvidia mentioned its release of Pascal that at first Pascal came out with lower clocks and then after refinement they could optimize their chips to run faster... I would like all of this explained to me.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old June 30, 2016, 06:20 PM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 5
Default rx 480

Great review on the rx 480, can't wait to see what rx 470 is like
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The R9 Nano Performance Review Comment Thread SKYMTL Video Cards 39 September 20, 2015 06:12 AM
NVIDIA GTX 970 SLI Performance Review (Comment Thread) SKYMTL Video Cards 12 November 18, 2014 05:31 PM
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 Performance Review Comment Thread SKYMTL Video Cards 46 May 1, 2014 02:15 PM
Far Cry 2 Hardware Performance Review Comment Thread FiXT Gaming 21 November 30, 2008 09:09 PM