![]() |
Performance lost from 5970 to 7950 ? i've lost performance with my new 7950 from when i had my 5970... 3D mark 11 i went from 98xx to 79xx :( bf3 is not faster and im about to try FC3 see what it says |
Anandtech comparison shows the 5970 as faster except for Skyrim and Batman (probably poorly optimized for crossfire). AnandTech - Bench - GPU12 |
so technically i bought this for nothing.... i guess ill bring it back |
Yup, think of the 5970 as only slightly less powerful than a 6990. On the other hand, your 7950 will run at 90% of the performance, but with half the heat and noise... |
Quote:
-ST |
Yeah the 5970 is still a really powerful card, as you've probably noticed by now. I don't know specifics or numbers, but I'll bet you the 7950 uses like half the power that the 5970 uses at full load. Okay maybe not half... |
For heat and noise i didn't care it was watercooled lol Juat thought i would gain performance going to 3gb on a single card rathet than 1gb per core |
Quote:
Basically if you not using all your memory there is 0 point in upgrading, which I guess you knew but makes it all the more important to check these things.. |
far cry 3 at ultra 2x and hbao, bf3 maxed out all at 1920x1080 bf3 i gain 10fps but far cry i lost 20ish i heard threw the bush far cry 3 needs minimum 2gb of memory for dx11 i think so the 5970 was only 1gb per core and its was scaling during the game, now its not scaling but running at 30-40 fps instead of 50-60 EDIT : Oc'ed the 7950 to 925core 1500memory and those gave me the curreny score 3dmark 11 9007 with oc'ed 7950 and my oc'ed 5970 was 94xx |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:06 AM. |