Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE > Video Cards

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old August 20, 2012, 08:47 AM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 18
Default Max Graphics question

In my new build I have about $1200 to spend on gfx cards and here are the choices I'm trying to decide between, keep in mind I do not care too much about performance per dollar I just want max performance for what's in my $1200 budget.

2x 680's
3x 670's
3x 660ti's

As of right now I am using only 1080p but my next upgrade may be a 2560x1440 monitor. Thanks in advance for opinions, and any insight as to why one option would give better performance.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old August 20, 2012, 08:58 AM
Adzsask's Avatar
Allstar
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SK
Posts: 831

My System Specs

Default

None of the above, either a single 690, or a pair of 670's.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old August 20, 2012, 09:28 AM
Bond007's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 3,125

My System Specs

Default

Pair of 670 and use the rest of the money towards another upgrade.
__________________
Desktop: Antec Three Hundred, Z77-D3H, 3570K undervolt @4.1ghz with Zalman Optima Cooler, Corsair Vengeance 2x4gb@1866mhz, HD 6950(unlocked shaders and OC'd), Bitfenix Fury 750w, WD Black 1TB, Intel 530 120GB
Away from home light Gamer: Acer Aspire 15.6", A8-3500m undervolt and OC to 2Ghz, 2x4gb Corsair Vengeance, Crucial M500 240gb
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old August 20, 2012, 09:55 AM
Dzzope's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Irishman in Kiev, wOOoo, I'm an alien...
Posts: 2,903

My System Specs

Default

Single 680 / 7970 should be fine for a single 2560x1440 monitor.. but if you want better than fine the as Adzsask said, 690 / Dual 670's would be my choice..

Really depends on if you want to go multi-monitor with the 27" or use it on it's own..
try to think ahead.. but not too far as if your staying single monitor for the next year then a new generation of cards will be out by the time you will need to upgrade for your monitors.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old August 20, 2012, 01:07 PM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 18
Default

I prob wont get to upgrade my vid cards again after this for about 2-3 years, so I just need to make sure whatever I go with will keep stuff running that far in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old August 20, 2012, 01:31 PM
Dzzope's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Irishman in Kiev, wOOoo, I'm an alien...
Posts: 2,903

My System Specs

Default

IMO, single 690 or dual 670's / 680's will be plenty enough.. Any more would be a waste of money as s tri sli doesn't scale that well and you'd be better saving the money now to upgrade a bit sooner..
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old August 20, 2012, 05:27 PM
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,385

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dzzope View Post
IMO, single 690 or dual 670's / 680's will be plenty enough.. Any more would be a waste of money as s tri sli doesn't scale that well and you'd be better saving the money now to upgrade a bit sooner..
This... You could also upgrade to a awesome monitor if you go with 2 670's afterall what are good graphics cards without an equally good monitor to view them on.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old August 21, 2012, 01:13 PM
NyteOwl's Avatar
Allstar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 905
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by satchmo2002 View Post
I prob wont get to upgrade my vid cards again after this for about 2-3 years, so I just need to make sure whatever I go with will keep stuff running that far in advance.
That was my idea when I built my current workstation 4 years ago this month. My HD4870 is still ticking along splendidly, though It doesn't handle things like BF3 and Metro very well these days. Still, good for pretty much all standard tasks and most games.

For that kind of money I'd go 690 or a pair of 670's.

Then again unless I was making a living doing graphics design or video editing I'd never think of spending that much money on video.
__________________
Obsolescence is just a lack of imagination.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old August 21, 2012, 01:26 PM
mchutch's Avatar
MVP
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Ontario
Posts: 433

My System Specs

Default GFX

I am using a single water cooled GTX 680 Superclocked+ with three 23" LCDs running @ 6048x1080, and a 52" LCD TV @ 1920x1080.

You can't go wrong with the dual 670's or a 690 but whatever cards you grab don't overlook putting a little money into cooling them well!

Doesn't have to be water, even choosing a good case where you can get air on 'em.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old August 21, 2012, 06:44 PM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 18
Default

I already have all the stuff for my watercooling except blocks ofc b/c still undecided on cards.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
best sub-$250 graphics andyhan95 Video Cards 7 April 17, 2012 03:54 AM
Is graphics card X more or less powerful than graphics card Y Linus LinusTechTips Q&A 1 October 4, 2011 06:50 AM
Intel HD Graphics with Graphics Card MoUnit CPU's and Motherboards 4 August 6, 2011 04:54 PM
AMD Extends Graphics Performance Lead, Launches World's Fastest Graphics Card? Again! FiXT Press Releases & Tech News 2 March 8, 2011 03:32 PM
[WTB] AGP Graphics Arinoth Buy/Sell & Trade 13 August 3, 2010 11:43 AM