Quote:
Originally Posted by enaberif I'm implying that some people like myself prefer non 1080p screens for gaming. I prefer a 16:10 resolution not a 16:9 resolution as 16:10 gives you more vertical height. |
I get that, I own three 19X12 displays (although my main display is a u2711) but that doesn't mean one can't run 3dmark11 on extreme. Perhaps you are running 1680X1050 I do not know. Regardless it stands to reason that at lower res one will be more likely to be affected by a cpu bottleneck. By the same logic it is rational to think that one would test as close as possible to actual gaming res
if the goal was to look for bottlenecks.
I have no doubt that the OP is bottlenecked at 720P in 3D11. However, chances are with a nice oc on that q9650 he could run games like BF3 very nicely with min frame rates over 60fps (assuming he does not have a 120hz panel what else matters?).