Quote:
Originally Posted by geokilla You left out lower power consumption and PPD for your $ and shader cores. Though I think this was discussed in the previous page...
And for those saying how the GTX 460 will kick butt for Folding@Home after the price drop, didn't the price drop happen already? |
Lower power consumption and lower PPD. I'd be willing to bet that the 450 provides equal or worse PPD per watt compared to the 460. PPD for your dollar? The MSRP of the 460 went down to $170 USD. An overclocked 460 does about 12k PPD, so that would be 12k/170 = ~71PPD/$ whereas the 450 is 9k/130 = ~69 PPD/$. PPD per shader has no bearing on anything so that doesn't even matter, although it's also worth considering that the 450 overclocks to a much higher frequency than the 460. Going by stock speeds, let's figure out the PPD per MHz per shader. A stock 460 does about 9k, so 9k/675MHz/336SP = ~0.04PPD/MHz/SP. A stock 450 does about 8k, so that's 8k/783MHz/192SP = ~0.05PPD/MHz/SP. So again, not much difference.
Yes, the price drop did happen, but it hasn't quite started being reflected in the actual market prices yet. However, I did recently buy a 768MB 460 for $146 from a US retailer.