Hardware Canucks

Hardware Canucks (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/)
-   Video Cards (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/video-cards/)
-   -   best performing low power nvidia card (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/video-cards/29782-best-performing-low-power-nvidia-card.html)

technix March 12, 2010 09:24 AM

best performing low power nvidia card
 
I'm just wondering what Nvidia card is the best performer but at modest heat and power levels.

I guess I should wait for fermi but won't those cards be power stations?!?

For current cards, I was thinking it might be the GTS 250?

I'm comparing to the ATI HD 5770 although I believe it's probably better than current comparable Nvidia cards. I guess I would like a Nvidia card for my Linux use but I like the ATI HD 5770 card overall as the performance and design is good, I think.

What should I doooo? :biggrin:

Soultribunal March 12, 2010 09:28 AM

What exactally are you doing with the card?

ST

_dangtx_ March 12, 2010 10:17 AM

later linux distros have fixed ati issues, as far as i know. i would go nvidia first, just in case. bro's machine used an ati for a while, ubuntu 8 or 9 i think

Wi-Fuzzy March 12, 2010 10:18 AM

I don't know if I would call a gts 250 a low power card.... and watch out for the green versions of the 250s...they run at lower clock speeds and it does hurt performance a fair bit. I would probably buy one of the ATI cards. But could go either way I guess. If it is just for casual gaming..get an ATI at least you get DX11.

My thoughts

technix March 12, 2010 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wi-Fuzzy (Post 346070)
I don't know if I would call a gts 250 a low power card.... and watch out for the green versions of the 250s...they run at lower clock speeds and it does hurt performance a fair bit. I would probably buy one of the ATI cards. But could go either way I guess. If it is just for casual gaming..get an ATI at least you get DX11.

My thoughts

Yes, casual gaming. However, what I do the most is watch movies on my computer but I also want decent 3D so when I run Google Earth, for e.g., I want it to work. I also like the option to add to my uses so if the card is capable, that is a big plus. I believe many Linux users claim that various ATI driver situations result in video tearing, depending on what you do exactly and which driver versions you're using. I guess the complications arise with so many factors with ATI, it's difficult to figure what may work and what results in these alleged issues.

I'll eventually have a SSD for Windows 7 and my current drive for Linux (booting). When TRIM matures for Linux, I'll get one for that, too.

I read that ATI is good until there's updates with X.org, X-Server, the kernel and other updates/upgrades that break or change something relating to video, video drivers and the card. Fedora users, for e.g., so far advise against ATI cards since the latest binary driver doesn't work and hasn't for a while. I read that ATI drivers can work in Ubuntu but several intangibles or factors have to be present. The latest driver might or might not work depending on whether you do the right tweaking. I have had some issues with my Nvidia card and it does involve a manual driver install if you want to use the latest driver and features. But, I always got it to work and the driver installed successfully, ultimately. It's like going with the devil you know, I guess. :biggrin:

I like how ATI has improved power efficiency and has cards with lower heat output but still maintains a decent amount of performance. The last batch of Nvidia cards have really good performance but maybe at the cost of considerable power and I'm not too sure about the heat. Maybe they run hotter than current ATI cards, I'm not sure. I guess some of these Nvidia cards will get cheaper when Fermi is officially widely released. The other problem is that ATI is often said to be slow with reacting to changes and in Linux, it can take twice as long or more for a driver update than Nvidia. One more concern is that Nvidia can work in Wine and ATI might or might not, depending on who you talk to.

I'd use Windows for the gaming, however, so that is the least of my complaints but just mentioning it.

Thanks for the comments and ideas.

jcmaz March 12, 2010 02:25 PM

I would get a GT240 coz i'm extremely low powered.

But i'd wait awhile till the midrange Fermi comes out.

johnnyblazzwa March 14, 2010 11:40 AM

now i would assume the new 9800gt eco intelligence

johnnyblazzwa March 14, 2010 11:43 AM

or i guess that would be if you if you want something extemly low powered

Sushi Warrior March 14, 2010 03:06 PM

A GT220 should be more than enough, a GTS250 would be overkill. You aren't gaming or anything.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:17 AM.