Quote:
Originally Posted by JDZL Fantastic reviews, Sky!
Boy, am I happy.
It was only a week ago that I had the irresistable urge to buy a 260 - 216/65nm from ncix at $200. I put the order through, but accidentally entered the wrong security code on my credit card (I think I got mixed up between the two credit cards that I use...)
Needless to say, the order didn't go through properly and was cancelled. As much as I wanted that card for 200 bucks, I couldn't be happier right now!
I'm curious to see how both cards overclock when the fan speeds are set a bit higher... I'm also looking forward to seeing some game (read: Crysis) benchies with an overclocked 4890. It looks very exciting :D
I guess it's time to wait for the xfx ati cards to hit ncix.
Thanks again, Sky!
-JD |
Not to put you down, but look at this chart.
techPowerUp :: Sapphire HD 4890 1 GB GDDR5 Review :: Page 29 / 33
The 4890 is only 7 percent faster. Honestly to save a hundred dollars and thirty dollars, I think the gtx core 216 would have been a better buy. Add that the gtx 260 216(only the gtx 275 and the 4890 were tested with new drivers) was not tested with the newest driver and you might shrink that difference down to a few percent.
This is coming from a guy who has already bought the 4890 because I paid 280 it and bought if for the lulzs so I can pair it up to a 4870x2.