Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE > Video Cards

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old October 11, 2008, 07:17 PM
CTA's Avatar
CTA CTA is offline
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: langley (vancouver) bc canada
Posts: 2,193

Originally Posted by BALISTX View Post
I didn't really notice a huge performance gain as for fps but I found they were more stable, especially his ATI drivers.

OmegaDrivers.net - Home of the ATI & NVIDIA Omega Drivers. Drivers Main Page

thank you for link... i will try it for sure...

btw the question is already answered ;p

omega nvidia 64 is 169.25 vs nvidia 64 is 178.13... o_O?
NEW: customize case, XFX 750W, i7 4770k, supreme hf, GA-Z87X-OC Force, 16gb gskill ripjaws 2133mhz , xfx hd6950 CF. 128gb intel 520, wd blue and toshiba 1tb, mcp355 + EK-XRES , 2x ar697, 2x PXM360, 12x AC F12 fans, 12 x shroud, STT 123W fan filter. 2442.88CDN
OLD: customize case, hx100, i7 920, supreme hf, x58 sabertooth, 3gbx2 ram of ripjaws, xfx hd6950 CF. vertex 2 60gb, seagate and hitachi 1tb, dual mcp355 with ek rex v2, 2x koolance ar697, 2x mcr320, 6x zm-f3 fans.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2008, 05:27 AM
BALISTX's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 2,033

Correct. The Omega Drivers are not as current as NVIDIA's most recent drivers as it takes Omega Drivers some time to work on the drivers.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes