Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE > Video Cards

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old October 11, 2008, 07:17 PM
CTA's Avatar
CTA CTA is offline
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: langley (vancouver) bc canada
Posts: 2,193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BALISTX View Post
I didn't really notice a huge performance gain as for fps but I found they were more stable, especially his ATI drivers.



OmegaDrivers.net - Home of the ATI & NVIDIA Omega Drivers. Drivers Main Page

thank you for link... i will try it for sure...


btw the question is already answered ;p


omega nvidia 64 is 169.25 vs nvidia 64 is 178.13... o_O?
__________________
---
NEW: customize case, XFX 750W, i7 4770k, supreme hf, GA-Z87X-OC Force, 16gb gskill ripjaws 2133mhz , xfx hd6950 CF. 128gb intel 520, wd blue and toshiba 1tb, mcp355 + EK-XRES , 2x ar697, 2x PXM360, 12x AC F12 fans, 12 x shroud, STT 123W fan filter. 2442.88CDN
OLD: customize case, hx100, i7 920, supreme hf, x58 sabertooth, 3gbx2 ram of ripjaws, xfx hd6950 CF. vertex 2 60gb, seagate and hitachi 1tb, dual mcp355 with ek rex v2, 2x koolance ar697, 2x mcr320, 6x zm-f3 fans.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old October 12, 2008, 05:27 AM
BALISTX's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 2,011
Default

Correct. The Omega Drivers are not as current as NVIDIA's most recent drivers as it takes Omega Drivers some time to work on the drivers.
__________________

Heatware
HWBOT
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes