Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE CANUCKS NEWS > Suggestions & Feedback

    
View Poll Results: Should CPUs in comparison be tested for performance clock for clock?
yes 5 27.78%
no 13 72.22%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old July 10, 2012, 05:01 PM
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,381

My System Specs

Dancing_Banana Upcoming CPU reviews

Hello to all
For the upcoming CPU reviews that will happen here on HWC, probably the next big thing will be AMD's Trinity and Phenom FX based on the Piledriver core, is it possible guys when you make the charts to have a chart that compares the CPUs at the same speed? Bring all CPUs thrown in the comparison to the same speed (either by downclocking or overclocking them lightly) and draw a chart for us the rest of the commoners to clearly see the difference between them? And maybe even have a percentage to the bars showing the advantage or the disadvantage compared to a baseline. And some folding numbers also please? For example, I have seen on Toms Hardware the review of the upcoming AMD Trinity for the desktop here http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...pu,3241-7.html
I don't want to stay and calculate the difference in performance/MHz in between a SKU at 3.9GHz and one at 2.9 GHz or 3.0 GHz. Do you think this is doable? Thank you!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old July 10, 2012, 05:42 PM
sswilson's Avatar
Moderator
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 14,212

My System Specs

Default

I'd vote no as you never really know what other processes (memory, NB, SB speeds as one example) are going to be affected by a clock speed change. As a bargain cpu purchaser (not cheap, but bargain... there's a difference) I'm a lot more interested in how a new CPU performs against similarly priced items than a clock-for-clock comparison.
__________________
EVGA X58 3X SLI / i7 980X / 3X 4G Mushkin Blackline Frostbite / XFX Pro 1000W / EVGA GTX 680 SC+ 2GB / Intel DC S3700 200G / WD 6401AALS / TT Lvl 10 GT
Swiftech MCP655 WC Pump / EK XT 240 Rad / 2X Scythe Ultra Kaze / EK Supreme HF / Primochill Myriad Dual Bay Res / Dell UltraSharp U2412M

Gigabyte C1007UN-D / 2X4G Gskill PC3-10700 / Pico PSU / 2.5" 750G Toshiba HDD / Mini-Box M350 / 1X 19" BenQ / 1X 17" HP
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old July 10, 2012, 06:00 PM
BlueByte's Avatar
Allstar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 515

My System Specs

Default

I vote No as well, its pretty easy to fig out rough numbers once you have a base line for a cpu so this would only take away from other benchmarks that might show a CPU strengths or weaknesses... or just needlessly add another graph for what takes 10 seconds to get you within 95% accuracy on a calculator.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old July 10, 2012, 06:01 PM
Top Prospect
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 164
Default

The results might be interesting in an abstract sense but I agree that price points vs performance is more useful to me.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old July 10, 2012, 06:29 PM
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,596

My System Specs

Default

While it would be an interesting point, I don't know if it would really have much value added. Personally I care about performance/$ and performance/watt and that's about it.
__________________
Desktop: Antec Three Hundred, Gigabyte Z77-D3H, i5 3570K with Zalman Optima Cooler, Corsair Vengeance 2x4gb 1600mhz, MSI Cyclone GTX 460, Seasonic S12II 500W, WD Black 1TB, Intel 530 120GB
Away from home light Gamer: Acer Aspire 15.6", A8-3500m undervolt and OC to 2Ghz, 2x4gb Corsair Vengeance, Crucial M500 240gb
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old July 10, 2012, 06:51 PM
Arinoth's Avatar
Moderator
F@H
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richmond Hill
Posts: 8,534

My System Specs

Default

I voted no, what should be compared is what each device is at stock and their price point (there you can figure out performance per dollar) and that whatever their max stable overclock results.

Intel and AMD don't say "our product at exactly the same speed beats our competitors", they just go along the lines that their cpu is better because of its performance and it's price.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old July 10, 2012, 10:56 PM
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Irishman in Kiev, wOOoo, I'm an alien...
Posts: 2,545

My System Specs

Default

I'd have to say no as well.. With the exception of if you are comparing an updated processor.. see sandy vs ivy or BD to PD

What would be goo would be to see side-by-side what the chip being reviewed does in oc's vs others in oc..
perhaps even just use the results from old tests (unless a driver update has skewed those results),
I know we can do this ourselves but I think it would add to the review if you could see the review item at stock - oc and then the competitors at oc(to keep the charts cleaner just drop the stock ones as oc only matters vs oc)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old July 11, 2012, 02:22 AM
GT7R's Avatar
Allstar
F@H
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Our universe
Posts: 991

My System Specs

Default

There is no point in that, as different architectures are designed to operate at different clocks. Same as comparing say a HD7970 & GTX680 clock per clock... pointless.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old July 11, 2012, 04:50 AM
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,561
Default

Doesn't make sense to compare clock speeds across chipset lines. If all the other hardware remained the same or similar I could see the usefulness of this, or to predict benefits of overclocking via extrapolation. But otherwise, nah!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Upcoming movies Mayoo Off Topic 13 April 21, 2012 11:09 PM
Upcoming GPU's James Bond 007 Video Cards 2 January 16, 2012 05:19 AM
How will the upcoming HST affect you? _dangtx_ Off Topic 65 May 19, 2010 07:41 PM
New upcoming build HaDeS New Builds 8 September 16, 2009 06:43 AM
Upcoming GPU Reviews: what YOU want to see SKYMTL Video Cards 46 November 17, 2008 07:29 AM