Ultimate Watercooling Round-Up
I was just pretty bored, looking at watercooling setups, galleries, worklogs, reviews, etc... By the time I finished I think I went through more than 15 websites.
So I wonder, any way you guys can dedicate some of your time to put this together?
It could look like something like this:
(review methodologies are up to you to decide, performance, value or just plain who gives you the coolest temperatures)
- Top 5 radiators
- Top 5 pumps
- Top 5 coolants
- Top 5 tubing
- And so on
I know it could be quite a lot of work, but it will be guaranteed to bring in a lot of traffic for sure. To have such a condensed information spot is very handy. There are sites already that do include some reviews, but like I said, they are either VERY outdated or just do not offer the complete package.
Think about it HWC :thumb:
Heh.... last time we did any kind of WC round-up it turned into a flamefest which rivalled (I honestly believe it was worse) the release of a Vid card platform..... ;)
WC setup methodolgy (unless sealed system) would be too complex to accomplish anything like what you want.
Don't get me wrong, I understand what you are saying but it is doubtful to happen.
not too bad of an idea. id say more like x kit vs y kit, made from such and such manufacturers parts. with hw canucks being known around the web i dont think there should be trouble for co's to ship sky or akg or whoever does wc reviews said parts.
Water cooling possibly has the most complex (and strict) testing of any computer part... those are 5 parts of each you would need to mount 5 times, test 5 times (for temp, flow, pressure etc.) and then put into excel and make several graphs and review the results... all with IDENTICAL testing methodology for each one.
It's a small miracle itself that you can find 5 top rads or 5 top blocks alone, 5 top EVERYTHING.....
I am not asking to come up with the BEST watercooling SETUP there is. If you are comparing radiators to radiators, you do not have to change the pump/cpu block/liquid/etc to test each one. You can simply choose a "template" setup to work with and tests the radiators with.
Core i7 920
3x 2GB Corsair Dominator
EK CPU Block
Then test 5 different radiators to see who gives you the best performance.
Next time you are reviewing CPU Blocks, you keep the same configuration provided above but if desired, use the radiator you chose as top performer above (or just pick a random one)
This could be done, trust me it would attract a lot of readers
I don't think you understand, this would take many, many, many times more effort and time than the GTX480 and 470 reviews combined... 5 (or around there) mounts, 5 (or whatever) tests (30min for idle temp, 30-60min for load temps?)... I don't know any other way to put it. It takes a VERY long time.
Mr. Diaz, do you watercool? I would think not from your casual assessment of how much time this would take. For me to drain a loop and swap a rad would take 30-45 minutes each. Leak test for a minimum of 6 hours, because I don't want to lose any more parts to leaks. Then do a couple hours of testing. You're looking at weeks of work. This is why there aren't a lot of people doing large comparison groups like this.
Ok, my point was completely ignored. That being said, forget I even mentioned anything
I was under the impression you were looking for HWC staff to review them. If that's not the case, please explain.
|All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:01 PM.|