Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE > Storage
Reload this Page WD SE16 640GB vs. Seagate 7200.11 640GB -- A somewhat complete analysis.
Mark Forums Read
Media Gallery Register Members List LAN Calendar Search Today's Posts

    
Reply
Page 6 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old October 1, 2008, 01:02 PM
Hall Of Fame
  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,342
Default
Hek please do, my local retailer has them for $74.95, one of the best prices.. That would be very nice of you Vortex.
__________________
Intel E8400, Biostar TPower i45
G-Skill PC2-8500 4GB, Saphire HD4870 512mb
Cooler Master HAF 932, Enermax Galaxy DXX 1000W
Samsung 931BW 19" LCD, Logitech MX Revolution
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old October 1, 2008, 01:05 PM
Chilly's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,593
Default
Love my WD drive :) (and yes I know thjis is not a 640GB, but it uses the same size platters)
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old October 1, 2008, 01:10 PM
Cptn Vortex's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,918
Default
Picked one up for $69 on a saturday special at NCIX
__________________
The Vortex H20

Coolermaster ATCS 840 w Window panel
MSI Z87-G45 Gaming
i5 4690K @ 4.5GHZ
SLI GTX 670 FTW
8GB GSkill Ripjaws X 2133MHZ CL10
OCZ Z-Series GOLD 850W
2 x 240GB Patriot Blaze SSD RAID0 :)
Lenovo P24q 24" IPS 2560x1440
Benq W1070 Pojector.

Watercooling:
EK Supreme HF, EK FC GTX 680 Block x 2, MCR320+Gelid Silent 12 Push/Pull, DD Pump, EK Multioption 100ml Res, EK Coolstream XT 220 RAD Gelid Wings Push/Pull.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old October 1, 2008, 01:12 PM
Hall Of Fame
  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,342
Default
You live in Vancouver so you could pick it up, I'd have to pay shipping cost. so $75 + tax for me, pretty good price. And Samsung have had some real nice drives..
__________________
Intel E8400, Biostar TPower i45
G-Skill PC2-8500 4GB, Saphire HD4870 512mb
Cooler Master HAF 932, Enermax Galaxy DXX 1000W
Samsung 931BW 19" LCD, Logitech MX Revolution
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old October 1, 2008, 03:46 PM
1Tanker's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,170
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilly View Post
Love my WD drive :) (and yes I know thjis is not a 640GB, but it uses the same size platters)
Actually, the 1TB are a smidgeon bigger(333GB vs. 320 in the 640), yet it performs worse. I wonder if the AAM is on with the 1TB, like the first WD640's were.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2008, 08:21 PM
Rookie
  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Default
I've had this drive for a few weeks now and my benchmarks have always shown the burst rate lower than 100MB/sec. This is my first SATA drive and from what I've read looking at the burst mode is the only way to know if you are in SATA/150 or SATA/300 mode. So I put the dip switch for SATA/150 mode back on and the burst rate doesn't change which leads me to believe the problem with the drive is it is ALWAYS IN SATA/150 mode regardless of setting. I've taken to leaving it in SATA/150 mode so I don't loose the dip.

The new 1.5TB seagate seems to have this burst rate problem too.

SATA/150 Top, SATA/300 Bottom
Attached Images
   
Last edited by cpuspeed; October 18, 2008 at 09:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2008, 10:22 PM
MAC's Avatar
MAC MAC is offline
Associate Review Editor
  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,103
Default
Are you sure that your issue is not motherboard related?
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2008, 10:52 PM
Rookie
  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Default
My MB is an Asus M3N72-D, nvidia 750a chipset. Other than setting AHCI mode in the bios and installing Nforce drivers there is really thing to set other than NCQ and DMA mode which are set by default. No setting to change SATA mode and the SATA driver says mode SATA/300 when testing regardless of drive jumper setting. I've tried without NCQ and no change. I've tried in IDE mode and then the burst mode go's up to ~150MB/sec if I recall correctly. Besides I don't seem to be the only one showing low burst rates.
__________________
Asus M3N72-D 750a MB
AMD BE-2400 (OC @ 3GHz)
4GB (2x2) Corsair Dominator 1066
Seagate 7200.11 640GB
HP LP2475w
Win XP Pro SP3
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2008, 11:03 PM
MAC's Avatar
MAC MAC is offline
Associate Review Editor
  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,103
Default
Sorry, my bad, my eyes played a trick on me, thought you were using a WD 640GB drive not Seagate.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old October 19, 2008, 06:34 AM
MacJunky's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Grande Cache, AB
Posts: 1,831

My System Specs

Default
We should really consider harassing Seagate further in regards to this.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 6 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode