Quote:
Originally Posted by AkG I'll see what I can do on getting one for review. No guarantees. ;) |
It would be cool if you could, thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SugarJ While I can see the potential use for these, I'm not interested. I'd rather just buy a Vertex 3 120GB for $200, than a Synapse 128GB for $270. You're paying for the caching software, but I think a 120GB boot/application drive would be faster in most cases. I'm not sure that the caching software will pass TRIM to the SF-2281 controller, so I think you'd see the Synapse drive degrade in performance with use. |
Ya the price is not that good but if it works good then it could be more of a benefit to me, my usage pattern changes a lot when it comes to games and some apps, I will start playing an older game that has been sitting on the hard-drive for a while, same goes for some apps I won't touch for a while then need all of a sudden. You get where I'm going with this, I don't want to reinstall an old game on SSD that I might only play for a day or keep apps on it I might not use for a while, this I think is the real benefit of caching, if they get it right that is. As far as TRIM goes I don't have much hope of it working, but I would hope OCZ has put in a more aggressive garbage collection than whats on other SandForce drives, a review would be nice.
Intel has also seen a need for this but there solution seems to have problems from what I have read, OCZ system could be better or not? But it seems that OCZ will give more control to the end user as to what files to cache, hopefully they get it right.