Go Back   Hardware Canucks > NEWS & REVIEWS > Rumor Mill

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old July 12, 2008, 02:16 AM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denmark
Posts: 14
Default GTX3x0 info exposed?!

According to hardspell.com
Quote:
It is said that NVIDIA possible cancel G200b and to release new G3x0. It will integrate 384SP and it will use 45nm technology. Its power consumption will cut a lot than G200. Its clocks will be improved to 850/2000MHz. It will match 1GB 256bit GDDR5 memory and the clock will be more than 4000MHz. It will defeat 4870X2.
HARDSPELL.COM-GTX3x0 info exposed?!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old July 12, 2008, 02:21 AM
Mibs's Avatar
MVP
F@H
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 311
Default

Well if there is any truth to this I am not surprised. They have to make something bigger and better eventually. It is unlike nvidia to let somebody else be the king of the hill, and the 4870x2 is expected to take that crown. It would be surprising if they went straight to a 45nm process, you would think the next step would be the 55nm a la 9800gtx+.
__________________
Intel C2D E6750 @ 3.52 GHz // EVGA 680i SLI Rev. A1 (P31) // 4 GB OCZ Platinum 800 MHz 4-4-4-15 // PC P&C Silencer 750 Quad // Antec P180 // EVGA 8800 GTS 512 // Samsung Syncmaster 226bw 22" LCD

WC Loop: D-Tek Fuzion V2 // Danger Den Maze 5 // Swiftech MCP655 // Swiftech MicroRes // Thermochill PA 120.2 + 4 x Noctua NF-P12
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old July 12, 2008, 10:38 AM
bojangles's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 2,683

My System Specs

Default

It definitely won't be 45 nm. That's simply TOO MUCH money down the drain, just to move from 55 nm so fast. Honestly going from 65 to 55 nm was not a great idea. There is not that much improvement over those. I think the only reason they're not moving to 45 nm yet was because neither company does not have the technology like Intel does to get down to 45 nm. Graphics cards are so powerful and if they do try to use the same lithography technology they have now on 45 nm, then the power consumption will be rediculous due to extremely high leakage currents. They need to adopt the high-K technology or something else that's out there. But Intel hates nvidia so who knows lol.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old July 12, 2008, 07:09 PM
b1lk1's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lindsay, Ontario
Posts: 2,499

My System Specs

Default

I bet launch prices will be $800+ on this one too........

Winning at all costs is bad for the consumer.
__________________
MY HEATWARE
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old July 13, 2008, 05:23 AM
Top Prospect
F@H
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 108

My System Specs

Default

It'll be interesting to see what they come up with,maybe they'll have Dr Evil doing adds for them selling cards with freaking lasers strapped to there heads next lol.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old July 13, 2008, 10:52 AM
Cheator's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,093
Default

Oh yeah? Well the Radeon 5850 coming out in 2 weeks has a billion megs of GDDR20 ram. :D

This really looks like a bad rumour, especially the "It will beat the 4870x2" since we haven't seen performance yet.
__________________
Optimus: Antec P180, Asus P5Q-E, E8400, 4 GB RAM, Asus 4850, Seagate 320gb, Antec TC II

Teletraan I: Asus P5K-E/WIFI, E4500, 2 GB RAM, ATI 3450, Sapphire Theatrix, 2.25TB storage, Antec SP2 400w

Galvatron: Asus M2NPV-VM, 3800+ X2, 2GB RAM, NV8500GT, Seasonic 500w

Tracks: Acer AS5920, C2D 2.1ghz 45nm, 3GB DDR2, NV8600m GT, 250gb hdd

Hound: Gigabyte GA-MA74GM-S, AMD 4400+ X2, 1 GB RAM, 2900XT, 500w Seasonic

My Heatware!
| Got RMA? Tell us your experience! | VOIP Help? PM ME!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old July 13, 2008, 02:02 PM
belgolas's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St. Thomas Ontario close to london
Posts: 3,925

My System Specs

Default

Wow The 5850 X16!
__________________

Sponsor a child!
Fight poverty.

Qoute by Perineum
"ID10T. I just BETCHA he's got 9 toolbars on his web browser right now."
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old July 14, 2008, 01:21 PM
MAC's Avatar
MAC MAC is offline
Associate Review Editor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bojangles View Post
It definitely won't be 45 nm. That's simply TOO MUCH money down the drain, just to move from 55 nm so fast. Honestly going from 65 to 55 nm was not a great idea. There is not that much improvement over those. I think the only reason they're not moving to 45 nm yet was because neither company does not have the technology like Intel does to get down to 45 nm. Graphics cards are so powerful and if they do try to use the same lithography technology they have now on 45 nm, then the power consumption will be rediculous due to extremely high leakage currents. They need to adopt the high-K technology or something else that's out there. But Intel hates nvidia so who knows lol.
You are aware that neither ATI nor NVIDIA manufacture their own wafers, right?

Both companies outsource production to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC) and United Microelectronics (UMC).
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old July 14, 2008, 05:09 PM
bojangles's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 2,683

My System Specs

Default

No I wasn't aware of that lol. But thanks for letting me know! But still, that would require TSMC to have the technology, right?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old July 14, 2008, 05:58 PM
belgolas's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St. Thomas Ontario close to london
Posts: 3,925

My System Specs

Default

Well I am sure that ATI might release the SUPER RV700!!!! Don don don..... Or in other words a highly overclocked 4870 X2 2gb card.
__________________

Sponsor a child!
Fight poverty.

Qoute by Perineum
"ID10T. I just BETCHA he's got 9 toolbars on his web browser right now."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes