Go Back   Hardware Canucks > NEWS & REVIEWS > Rumor Mill

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2012, 09:38 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: midland, ontario
Posts: 519
Default AMD FX-series Vishera CPUs price rumored to be cheaper then reported before

According to fud on a repost from another site:

"According to a latest rumor, AMD's upcoming Vishera FX-Series CPUs might actually surprise a lot of people with their price.

As rumored earlier, AMD plans to launch a total of four FX-Series CPUs based on the new Piledriver architecture including the flagship FX-8350, as well as the FX-8320, FX-6300 and the FX-4300. The flagship eight-core FX-8350 ticks at 4GHz with 4.2GHz Turbo, features 16MB of cache (8MB of L3 cache) and should sell at US $199.

The lower clocked eight-core FX-8320 working at 3.5/4.0GHz should launch at US $175. The six-core 3.5GHz/4.1GHz clocked FX-6300 will launch at US $135, while the quad-core 3.8GHz/4GHz clocked FX-4300 will have a launch price of US $125.

The pricing sounds pretty good and will surely put some additional pressure on Intel's performance equivalents.

You can check out VR-Zone post here."

AMD FX-series Vishera CPUs price rumored
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2012, 09:42 AM
Soultribunal's Avatar
Moderator
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 8,048

My System Specs

Default

Please please AMD perform well. I really want an excuse to purchase your stuff again.

-ST
__________________




"We know not why he calls for us, only that when he does we must answer" - DMP 2009

"Dear Iceberg, I am sorry to hear about global warming. Karma is a bitch. Signed - Titanic"

I would rather believe and find god doesn't exist than to not believe and find that he does.

www.realhardwarereviews.com
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2012, 09:47 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: midland, ontario
Posts: 519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soultribunal View Post
Please please AMD perform well. I really want an excuse to purchase your stuff again.

-ST
IF these new price rumors are true that the 8350 will go for like $200 & preforms around a 2600k/ivy bridge equivelent .... I think alot of us will pull the trigger.

Of course with 5 days away from there suposive launch ..... Sky might be the guy to know that & not able to say much about so till then ...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2012, 10:52 AM
SKYMTL's Avatar
HardwareCanuck Review Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,404
Default

I won't talk but IF (and that is a big IF) the higher end Vishera part goes for $199, the closest unlocked Intel processor is the 3570K which actually performs a BIT better than the 2500K.

Intel's current / previous lineup looks like this:

Sandy Bridge E:

3960X (6C, 12T): Still in market ($1030)
3930K (6C, 12T): Still in market ($570)
3820: Still in market ($299)


SB to IVB:

2700K (4C, 8T) --> 3770K 4/8 ($329)
2600K 4C, 8T) --> No direct replacement
2500K (4C, 4T) --> 3570K 4/4 ($229)
2500 (4C, 4T) --> 3570 4/4 ($199)

And so on....

So IF AMD hits that $199 mark, they will essentially be going up against a processor that is NOT unlocked and only has four threads.

On the flip side, as we saw in the Trinity review, the Piledriver (and Bulldozer) architecture very much lacks single thread performance.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2012, 12:34 PM
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,369

My System Specs

Default

I'm sorry but as an AMD fan this looks like AMD have not hit the mark on performance and are dropping prices to compensate. Also even if they do compete in some benchmarks with 2600k we all know single core performance probably won't be there.

I would love for AMD to prove me wrong.

Last edited by JJThomp; October 18, 2012 at 12:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2012, 02:16 PM
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,609

My System Specs

Default

Fingers crossed, but I think it's going to take a miracle for both single core performance and power consumption to come into check with a one generation jump... Both of which I will want with my next cpu.
__________________
Desktop: Antec Three Hundred, Gigabyte Z77-D3H, i5 3570K with Zalman Optima Cooler, Corsair Vengeance 2x4gb 1600mhz, MSI Cyclone GTX 460, Seasonic S12II 500W, WD Black 1TB, Intel 530 120GB
Away from home light Gamer: Acer Aspire 15.6", A8-3500m undervolt and OC to 2Ghz, 2x4gb Corsair Vengeance, Crucial M500 240gb
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2012, 03:25 PM
Allstar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 559
Default

they still look like great video encoding CPUs :D
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2012, 06:02 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: midland, ontario
Posts: 519
Default

What also has me curious is how they will be in both a win 7 & win 8 envoiroment ...

I think the lower costs could also be as result of how bad the whole fx thing went in general. Cause lets face it ... if everyone views it negatively & still being "crap" its gonna be hard to sell a revised version of "crap" for higher price point.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2012, 06:37 PM
Your_friendly_gamer's Avatar
Allstar
F@H
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 652

My System Specs

Default

I am not going to keep my fingers crossed, its going to suck. But miracles can happen, and I really hope they turn things around. But still I highly doubt it. AMD is too far behind in mainstream processors. They used to be 2 generations behind and now 3.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old October 18, 2012, 07:05 PM
SKYMTL's Avatar
HardwareCanuck Review Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Your_friendly_gamer View Post
I am not going to keep my fingers crossed, its going to suck. But miracles can happen, and I really hope they turn things around. But still I highly doubt it. AMD is too far behind in mainstream processors. They used to be 2 generations behind and now 3.
Let's put it this way: if Intel keeps up the incremental updates (5-7% increase from one generation to the next), then Intel may be playing catch up mid way through the next cycle.

The move from Bulldozer -> Piledriver is supposed to give an bump of some 10-15% according to AMD's publicly available slides. We'll see whether or not that will happen. Two more refreshes of that and Intel / AMD will be tied. All AMD has to do is fix their single thread performance and get 22nm out of the door.

The one ace up Intel's sleeve that AMD doesn't (and won't) have is Hyperthreading which essentially allows Intel to do more with less cores and lower power consumption.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD FX-Series "Vishera" Microprocessors Available for Pre-Order Online.(update) terrybear Rumor Mill 26 September 23, 2012 04:19 AM
[FS] Huge Price Drops! Motherboards CPUs Headsets Video Cards PSU Mini PCs SlickEnuf4U Buy/Sell & Trade 39 July 20, 2012 08:31 AM
Intel 320 Series SSD Rumored for March 28th FiXT Press Releases & Tech News 10 March 22, 2011 08:40 PM
Rumored GTX 465! Silvgearx Rumor Mill 41 July 10, 2010 02:09 PM
800 Series Chipsets Support What CPUs? geokilla CPU's and Motherboards 8 May 20, 2010 03:43 PM