Quote:
Originally Posted by TedShackley I have a ASUS m4a89gtd pro, so I could run a BD
I fear BD will be way behind SB i5-2500k in games
most games don't use 4 cores yet, let alone 8, all I want/need is a 4 core gaming chip.
And if the FX8 is clocked higher and can OC better than the FX4, for me thats even worse again, because theres no point paying +$300 for a faster 8 core just to 2-4 cores in games
What would the price and performance of a FX4 or FX6 have to be for me to upgrade from my pII x4 40, I don't know, but with the i5-2500k at $220 and some Z68 MB being IB capable aswell..... |
Cept you forgot the main fact win 7 utilizes all the cores, other apps utilize all the cores & the most ovious that there ARE games out there that will utilize the cores. Games from last year forward ARE multi core supported, so your theory/observation is a lil shot down there.
Good luck tryin to game in a multi core intensive game & have other apps running in the background on a 2500K ... Peaple seem to not factor into things the multi tasking / multi application side of things. If all you run on a pc is 1 game/application & NOTHING else then core's/threads beyond say 2 isn't a big issue for you. BUT start throwing into the background activly running things like im's, ventrilo/teamspeak/skype not to mention the cpu resources tied up by any onboard items you've enabled & more & more you cpu is stressed out/running warmer. That is where having more cores benefits in not only resources but also heat n such.