HAF 912

[JD]

Originally Posted by jcmaz

Cooler Master HAF 912 Unveiled at Quakecon 2010.

Hopefully some legit pictures of the HAF 912.

@ CM MR HAF: Where are my dust filters? I can't really see them in the pictures.

Isn't that really similar to the leaked ones? I see they've since been remove though, which probably means they were legit?

[Zero82z]

Originally Posted by jdrom17

Isn't that really similar to the leaked ones? I see they've since been remove though, which probably means they were legit?

Yeah, that's what I'm thinking as well. The positions of the power and reset buttons are the same as the supposed leaked pictures, though a direct comparison isn't possible (unless someone still knows where to find those pictures).

[CM MR HAF]

Originally Posted by jcmaz

Cooler Master HAF 912 Unveiled at Quakecon 2010.

Hopefully some legit pictures of the HAF 912.

@ CM MR HAF: Where are my dust filters? I can't really see them in the pictures.

The filters are behind the front bezel covers, and the bottom 2 x 120mm fan area. Look forward to the reviews coming 9/6.

[mramzi]

Originally Posted by CM MR HAF

Look forward to the reviews coming 9/6.

[jcmaz]

More info on the HAF912 from Overclock.net

[XSR] HAF912 reviewed - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net

[SugarJ]

LOL. The original review has been pulled down, as the editor "forgot" he had signed an NDA.

[CM MR HAF]

The review linked is not the HAF 912.

[n-ster]

tells you how trustful the editor is XD

[Zero82z]

Originally Posted by CM MR HAF

The review linked is not the HAF 912.

So what is it then? The pictures look pretty legitimate and the case looks just like the leaked pictures from a while ago.

[JD]

Originally Posted by Zero82z

So what is it then? The pictures look pretty legitimate and the case looks just like the leaked pictures from a while ago.

Yeah...I'm starting to question CM MR HAF credibility here...

Basically he's saying this review site got an amazing fake product with seemingly proper CM packaging and all. Then said site removes the review due to NDA (which I'd imagine is signed with CM).

Anyways, the pictures that were (and still are if you're smart) there, that site did really poor photography. Some of them aren't even in focus really, and the rest are close ups. No good shots really.