Go Back   Hardware Canucks > NEWS & REVIEWS > Reviews & Articles from the Web

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old March 19, 2008, 11:41 PM
yycraven's Avatar
Allstar
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Martensville,SK
Posts: 937

My System Specs

Default Q9300 review by X-bit labs

I read this review on the new Q9300 series quad core and i figured they would be way faster then just a few percentage marks on certain applications.

X-bit labs - The Youngest of Yorkfields: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 Processor Review


they also cut back on the L2 cache.
__________________
ASRock Extreme 3,2500K,NH-D14,Patriot G2 16GB ,WD 750GB,640GB Sata ,2 GTX 470 SLi Thermaltake toughpower XT850W,Tech Station. V243H,2253LW LCD
heatware
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old March 20, 2008, 01:01 AM
Cptn Vortex's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,726
Default

Interesting...... Too bad really! Looks like the Q9450 is going to be the top choice, or the Xeon X3350
__________________
The Vortex H20

Coolermaster ATCS 840 w Window panel
MSI Z77A-GD65
Intel i7 3770K @ 4.6GHZ 1.28v
Galaxy GTX 680 @ 1241MHZ
8GB Mushkin Blackline 1600MHZ 9-9-9-24 1.5v
Asus Xonar Essence STX
OCZ Z-Series GOLD 850W
2 x 128GB Corsair Force GT SATA3 SSD RAID0 :)
Acheiva Shimian Q270 Lite 2560x1440

Benq W500 Pojector.

Watercooling:
EK Supreme HF, EK FC GTX 680 Block, MCR320+Gelid Silent 12 Push/Pull, DD Pump, EK Multioption 100ml Res, EK Coolstream XT 220 RAD Gelid Wings Push/Pull.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old March 20, 2008, 05:54 AM
Babrbarossa's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 3,673

My System Specs

Default

They cut back on the L2 but I think they beefed up the L3 quite a bit- like AMD's phenom

EDIT: nope- I was thinking of teh nehalems- L3 cache not possible without true quad core.

Last edited by Babrbarossa; March 20, 2008 at 06:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old March 20, 2008, 07:39 AM
AkG's Avatar
AkG AkG is offline
Hardware Canucks Reviewer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,322
Default

Yeah its been known for awhile the 9300's were going to be nothing more than 9450/9550/etc rejects w/ half their cache laser cut. To bad, they would have KILLED AMD in the low end if they had the beefy big cache of their bigger brothers.
__________________
"If you ever start taking things too seriously, just remember that we are talking monkeys on an organic spaceship flying through the universe." -JR

“if your opponent has a conscience, then follow Gandhi. But if you enemy has no conscience, like Hitler, then follow Bonhoeffer.” - Dr. MLK jr
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old March 23, 2008, 08:14 PM
Allstar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Van Isle, BC
Posts: 550
Default

Intel said several months back that the new 45 nm chips weren't going to be much, if any, faster clock-for-clock compared to the 65 nm chips, so this is no surprise ...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old March 24, 2008, 08:04 AM
b1lk1's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lindsay, Ontario
Posts: 2,501

My System Specs

Default

It amazes me the attitudes people have (and I am not pointing any of you guys out so please don't misunderstand me) on the internet about the 45nm CPU's. They were never meant to be alot better than the 65nm chips as Jmac said but is seems people were expecting them to be. The lower multi's are alittle bit of a handicap on some current boards, but the 790i/X48 boards are already showing amazing FSB speeds which will let these CPU's really stretch their legs. 45nm does clock better with lower voltage since my QX6850 needs 1.4V to run 3.65GHz while my QX9650 does 3.8GHz with 1.25V. The heatload is also alot lower for the 45nm CPU's. I guess we have all become very spoiled with constant upgrades and now that the upgrade curve has flattened, expectations have far exceeded even what we were told to expect.
__________________
MY HEATWARE
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old March 24, 2008, 08:39 AM
werty316's Avatar
MVP
F@H
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 427
Default

Ouch other than the lower power consumption when OC'd, the Q9300 ain't looking so great.
__________________
If you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck Norris you may be only seconds away from death.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes