Hardware Canucks

Hardware Canucks (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/)
-   Reviews & Articles from the Web (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/reviews-articles-web/)
-   -   IDE better than AHCI for SSD's? (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/reviews-articles-web/31004-ide-better-than-ahci-ssds.html)

kk22 April 14, 2010 10:15 AM

IDE better than AHCI for SSD's?
 
Benchmark Reviews did a comparison running SSDs in IDE Mode vs AHCI Mode. There are some interesting results.

I've always thought TRIM doesn't work in IDE Mode, but the article says "TRIM is non-specific to SATA controller modes, and will work equally well in both IDE and AHCI-mode."

http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...=499&Itemid=38

lowfat April 14, 2010 11:07 AM

They used HDTune only for the entire test. That right there stops me from taking the review all that seriously.

tri5cui7 April 14, 2010 11:10 AM

From personal experience I've noticed faster results with ACHI with my intel ssd. I find these results a bit hard to sallow, but I'll leave it for the pros (Gingerbee and AKG) to decide.

gingerbee April 14, 2010 11:30 AM

ahci is better in my experience. hdtune is flyby night i use it all the time to get a quick read but as ssd or crystal disk mark is what they should have used. jmo

lowfat April 14, 2010 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gingerbee (Post 363578)
ahci is better in my experience. hdtune is flyby night i use it all the time to get a quick read but as ssd or crystal disk mark is what they should have used. jmo

They should have used Iometer for the IOP testing. Anything else is just plain silly.

lemonlime April 14, 2010 12:20 PM

With my Indilinx drive, I noticed better 4K random reads/writes with AHCI enabled, but sequential performance was a tad better with IDE. I went with IDE simply for the quicker boot-up times skipping the ICH initialization :biggrin:

gingerbee April 14, 2010 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lowfat (Post 363593)
They should have used Iometer for the IOP testing. Anything else is just plain silly.

um ya not including one is just bad. but your right you can't beat the IO meter test i don't use it all teh time but this is a review we are talking about so.:thumb:

kk22 April 14, 2010 01:15 PM

Thanks guys. Yeah, that comparison is lacking some content.

If worthwhile, a HWC review/guide on this would be great. :biggrin:

Oversized Rooster April 14, 2010 03:38 PM

I don't see how for all their IOPS tests, SSD drives connected via AHCI would get a ridiculous "Random" benchmark of under 10.

That is simply not true in real life. I run an OCZ Summit on my laptop as well as dual OCZ Vertex drives on my main machine. Both setups use AHCI and the random IOPS number is in the several hundred range; not under 10. :haha:

ayah April 14, 2010 04:23 PM

Unfortunately, they have zilch for SSD knowledge. =\


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:46 AM.