Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE > RAM

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old March 15, 2007, 11:19 AM
Babrbarossa's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 3,673

My System Specs

Default Forget High-Speed RAM- go for low latency and a 6xxi

This article from Legion Hardware is a MUST read- It answers alot of questions about which memory to choose and finds some surprising results when coparing performance of different bandwidths and different latencies. They conclude that expensive high speed memory can be a real waste of money in some Intel setups (ie NVidia mobos unlocked), where it can be outperformed by 667 with low latencies.

"Double Data Rate (DDR) memory started life at 200MHz (PC-1600) developing 1.6GB/s and with dual channel technology had the potential to double this theoretical peak bandwidth. Eventually DDR hit 400MHz (PC-3200) and this was the final JEDEC specification for the DDR memory standard. In dual channel operation DDR-400 could produce up to 6.4GB/s of memory bandwidth, which was more than enough for any AMD or Intel processor at the time. In fact, it was more than enough for the upcoming AMD and Intel processors for quite some time as well.

Nevertheless, Intel wanted to push on and therefore did so by quickly adopting DDR2 technology, which started at 400MHz developing the same 3.2GB/s of DDR-400 memory. However, despite poorer memory timings DDR2-400 memory was actually much slower than DDR-400 memory, which was obviously quite a problem. Therefore the PC-4200 specification was quickly released, operating at 533MHz and developing 4.2GB/s of memory bandwidth. Despite offering a 32% increase in memory bandwidth, DDR2-533 memory was still slower than low latency DDR-400 memory. "
More from Legion Hardware

Last edited by Babrbarossa; March 15, 2007 at 12:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old March 15, 2007, 02:19 PM
Misoprostol
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

very interesting read. Makes me feel pretty good about a position that I've had for a very long time: More memory is better than faster memory.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old March 15, 2007, 03:04 PM
BALISTX's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 2,005
Default

Very interesting and with the price of a nForce 650i board being $166.75 for an Asus P5N-E SLI nForce 650i it makes it very interesting.
__________________
"Though I walk through the shadow of the Valley of Death I shall fear no evil as my C8 Carbine is locked and loaded."

Next Build: E5200 @ 3.6GHz (333x11) | Xigmatek HDT-RS1283 HSF | Biostar TP43D2-A7 | Mushkin Redlines DDR2-1000 @ DDR2-999 5-5-5-12
EVGA 9600 GT 512MB - 650MHz - 1800MHz - 1626MHz | Seagate 'Cuda 250GB 7200rpm SATA2 | Corsair VX550 | CM690 - Custom Atomic Orange Pearl


[Heatware]
[eBay]
[Rosetta]
BALISTX.com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old March 15, 2007, 03:48 PM
Deathspawner's Avatar
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Misoprostol View Post
very interesting read. Makes me feel pretty good about a position that I've had for a very long time: More memory is better than faster memory.
True, but if you have a very high frequency, having loose timings may still wind up being faster than tighter timings at lower frequencies. I am sure 3-3-3 PC2-6400 beats out PC2-8000 4-4-4, but I doubt it would stand a chance against PC2-1100 5-5-5.

Mushkin just released a new kit that has the best of both worlds... 4GB (2* 2GB) PC2-8500 with 5-4-4 timings.
__________________
Techgage.com | Editor in Chief

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz, ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, OCZ 8GB PC2-6400, EVGA GTX 285 1024MB
Seagate 500GB, 750GB & 1TB, Pioneer 22x ODD, Corsair 1000HX, Thermalright Ultra-120, CM Storm Sniper
Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Ultrasone PRO 750, Gentoo Linux (KDE 4.4, 2.6.32 Kernel)

"Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter

Profiles: Last.fm | Xbox Live | Steam
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old March 15, 2007, 04:23 PM
Babrbarossa's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 3,673

My System Specs

Default

There's your next performance review right there! - try it on an evga 680i and a 975
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old March 17, 2007, 11:22 PM
papixx's Avatar
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ottawa
Posts: 17
Default

Thanks, good read. What about DDR2 and AM2 systems? I have bought a DFI ULTRAII-M2 + X2 3800+ + X1950XT 512, but have YET to buy ram!! What do you guy's think?
__________________
b m x e r @ e o c f
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old March 18, 2007, 11:20 AM
Deathspawner's Avatar
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 204
Default

Any OCZ PC2-6400 kit should suit you well. Are you planning to overclock at all? I almost find less of a need to overclock on AM2s anyway... the latencies are always better as is the bandwidth, thanks to the IMC.
__________________
Techgage.com | Editor in Chief

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz, ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, OCZ 8GB PC2-6400, EVGA GTX 285 1024MB
Seagate 500GB, 750GB & 1TB, Pioneer 22x ODD, Corsair 1000HX, Thermalright Ultra-120, CM Storm Sniper
Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Ultrasone PRO 750, Gentoo Linux (KDE 4.4, 2.6.32 Kernel)

"Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter

Profiles: Last.fm | Xbox Live | Steam
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old March 18, 2007, 12:23 PM
b1lk1's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lindsay, Ontario
Posts: 2,488

My System Specs

Default

For me, running 1:1 with the CPU has always been better for stability. For the minute gain in bandwidth almost always comes with a loss in stability. To each his own, but getting some good CAS 3 PC2 5400 ram or CAS 4 PC6400 is the best way to go. If you plan on running your CPU stock, anything over PC6400 is a huge waste of money. And more than 2GB is still only really needed by video processing pro's with a 64-bit OS.
__________________
MY HEATWARE
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old March 19, 2007, 12:00 PM
papixx's Avatar
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ottawa
Posts: 17
Default

Thanks. I think I'll order these today:
http://www.ncix.com/products/index.p...7&promoid=1030
__________________
b m x e r @ e o c f
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old March 31, 2007, 04:12 PM
lowfat's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grande Prairie, AB
Posts: 7,918

My System Specs

Default

This doesn't hold as true for 965P boards. I got a good 5% increase in speed with Aquamark when using 500MHZ 4-4-4-4 over 400MHz 3-3-2-4. I did 5 benches with each one, and it was always consistent. CPU clock speed was the same both times.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hooray! Cdma High Speed For Babs!!! Babrbarossa Networking 34 May 24, 2008 11:14 AM
Lest We Forget Scratch Off Topic 12 November 11, 2007 08:55 PM
High Speed PC Tech Station Review Discussion Thread Misoprostol Cases 10 July 8, 2007 01:45 PM
Shaw high speed cable reliability Shadowed Off Topic 18 April 10, 2007 01:32 PM