How is Sandy not like Nehalem? You don't need fast RAM on either platform. 1333 is fine, 1600 is about best bang for buck.
Memory scaling on Core i7 Nehalem
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...i7,2325-7.html
Look at the memory scaling on the gaming benchmarks on the Toms review vs. Anand's review.
Anandtech just published an article. I think you will find it very enlightening:
AnandTech - Sandy Bridge Memory Scaling: Choosing the Best DDR3 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Anandtech I think we confirmed what we pretty much knew all along: Sandy Bridge's improved memory controller has all but eliminated the need for extreme memory bandwidth, at least for this architecture. It's only when you get down to DDR3-1333 that you see a minor performance penalty. The sweet spot appears to be at DDR3-1600, where you will see a minor performance increase over DDR3-1333 with only a slight increase in cost. The performance increase gained by going up to DDR3-1866 or DDR3-2133 isn't nearly as pronounced.
...
If your primary concern is gaming, you’ll want to consider investing in more GPU power instead of a faster system memory; likewise, a faster CPU will be far more useful than more memory performance for most applications. |