Hardware Canucks

Hardware Canucks (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/)
-   RAM (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/ram/)
-   -   2500k RAM (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/ram/41241-2500k-ram.html)

AKY March 1, 2011 03:40 PM

2500k RAM
 
For some reason I was under the impression that a 2500k could only use DDR3-1333 RAM.. However, reading on here I can see that people are saying that 1600 RAM would be easier to use for overclocking. I can still change my order with NCIX. I purchased this kit : Mushkin Enhanced Silverline Stiletto 8GB 2X4GB PC3-10666 DDR3-1333 9-9-9-24 Dual Channel Memory Kit

Would is be better to go to this kit for a similar price, or would I not see much of a difference?


Mushkin Enhanced Blackline Frostbyte 8GB 2X4GB PC3-12800 DDR3-1600 C9-9-9-24 Dual Channel Memory Kit



AKY March 1, 2011 03:41 PM

And I am looking to overclock my system as much as I can..

xd_1771 March 1, 2011 04:07 PM

The 1600Mhz kit would be much better considering as you said it costs about the same. You may be able to find a different-branded 1600Mhz kit for even less.

AKY March 1, 2011 04:19 PM

Thanks.. I just canceled it. I am actually waiting to buy my mobo and CPU so I will see if I can pick up a kit of 1600 when they come out.

_dangtx_ March 1, 2011 04:27 PM

reason tells you that because of the unlocked multi you dont need to care about ram,lol.
usually yes but when you reach for that 5 something ghz? the last half a meter will or rather
can be quite weird. let me explain . i have a board here,mkay? i had to disable the lot of features ,
minus usb and network to get the last 50 mhz stable. and the ram clocked down. dont ask why,its
like that.

BoxSocial July 7, 2011 04:18 AM

Grab some Patriot Sector 7 or 8. Great RAM.

YukonTrooper July 7, 2011 02:29 PM

You won't see any real-world difference by switching to a different kit. The only difference you'll see is in benchmarks and the appearance of the heat-spreaders. Gaming and applications there is zero difference. You could run at 1000MHz or 1800MHz and there would be absolutely no difference in terms of real-world performance, nadda. If the Stiletto kit is the cheapest, I would stick with it. I went with the cheapest kit with heat-spreaders I could find at the time of purchasing my recent build, and that happened to be the 8GB Stiletto kit.

G777 July 7, 2011 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YukonTrooper (Post 531040)
You won't see any real-world difference by switching to a different kit. The only difference you'll see is in benchmarks and the appearance of the heat-spreaders. Gaming and applications there is zero difference. You could run at 1000MHz or 1800MHz and there would be absolutely no difference in terms of real-world performance, nadda. If the Stiletto kit is the cheapest, I would stick with it. I went with the cheapest kit with heat-spreaders I could find at the time of purchasing my recent build, and that happened to be the 8GB Stiletto kit.

There is actually a significant real world difference running folding@home on faster ram.

Just sayin':whistle:

YukonTrooper July 7, 2011 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G777 (Post 531043)
There is actually a significant real world difference running folding@home on faster ram.

Just sayin':whistle:

Oops, my mistake. I'll correct myself and say games and the majority of applications won't see any performance increase. :biggrin:

zsamz_ July 8, 2011 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YukonTrooper (Post 531075)
Oops, my mistake. I'll correct myself and say games and the majority of applications won't see any performance increase. :biggrin:

you get 1-3fps more with faster ram:whistle:
1866 is a minimum in my book
i run 2150+ cas7:punk:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:54 AM.