Go Back   Hardware Canucks > NEWS & REVIEWS > Press Releases & Tech News

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old April 30, 2012, 12:11 PM
Kommie986's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 601

My System Specs


Originally Posted by Dzzope View Post
And EA aren't?

hmm. lets release some maps and a few vehicles and charge people for it when they got fook all of either in the first place...

Hope they do better than EA.. Would be hard to do worse (IMO)
New content costs money to create...

Originally Posted by ilya View Post
By your logic EA is even worse than Nexon considering EA's F2P portfolio is way bigger.
Uh, BF:F2P, what else? And Nexon was built on F2P games, where as EA was built on retail high quality ones.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old April 30, 2012, 12:56 PM
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Markham
Posts: 1,557

My System Specs


EA has multiple subdivisions working on F2P (aka pay to play) franchises. Here's one: Play4Free Home I'm pretty sure that division alone has just as many games as Nexon. They also have countless failed F2P attempts.

If you look past the fact that Nexon games are built to be addictive grindfests, they have games that are just as good as EA. Plus they don't have the bad publicity of being the worst company in America.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Somali Pirates in Discussions to Acquire Citigroup kirk_d Off Topic 1 November 22, 2008 11:31 PM