Go Back   Hardware Canucks > NEWS & REVIEWS > Press Releases & Tech News

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old March 4, 2007, 11:10 AM
Babrbarossa's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 3,727

My System Specs

Default Can the ATi Lasso rope in better laptop graphics performance?

This might have been better in the rumour section at this point, but here's a blurb from Hexus about ATI's endeavors to produce external graphics solutions for laptops which may narrow the performance gap with desktops, and if graphics cards continue to get bigger and more power hungry- who knows- maybe we'll even see this kind of things sitting on top of our desktops along with their own power supply .

"Portable computers can compete quite well against desktops in terms of performance, even at the high end, if you like your laptop heavy, but one area where they slip behind is graphics. Not any more, if ATI's Lasso can deliver what we think it can.
Fitting one, let alone two high end graphics cards into a laptop, and then powering them is, well... a bit of a bugger. What would be really cool is if the GPUs could be housed externally, interfacing with the laptop rather than residing within it. "But wait Steve, we've already seen such a solution" you shout, yes? Indeed the ASUS XG station strives to do that for lappies with ExpressCard slots. ATI's working on a little something of its own, however.
They're calling it Lasso and it'll go a bit further than having an external graphics card for a laptop. Lasso will be able to house multiple graphics boards providing what could frankly prove to be hilarious processing capabilities... and those of you keeping up with the GPGPU scene will know that it's not about games performance. Modern GPUs can do some serious general purpose wet-work, leaving the CPU cores to work on other things.
Details right now are scarce, but imagine having a pair of R600s plugged into your laptop, or indeed augmenting a small form factor PC, or a workstation..."

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old March 4, 2007, 11:53 AM
enaberif's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgahree, AB
Posts: 11,058

Its still ATI and ATI is junk.

Someone explain to me why ATI requires .NET 2.0 FW to be installed?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old March 4, 2007, 03:59 PM
sswilson's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 17,315

My System Specs


That's only for CCC.

Most ATI folks install the bare drivers (or third party hacks) and then use ati tray tools for control.
ASUS ROG Strix Z370-G Gaming (WiFi AC) / i7 8700K / 2X 8G XPG Spectrix D40 (3000) / XFX XTR 750 / ASUS Strix GTX 1070ti
AZZA Titan 240 / Custom WC / Intel 730 Series 480GB SSD / Intel 760p 512GB NVMe / Seagate Barracuda 1TB / ASUS SWIFT PG279Q

Asrock AM1H-ITX / AM1 Athlon 5350 / 1X4G Gskill PC3-14900 / Intel 6235 Wi-Fi / 90W Targus Power Brick / Uncased 256GB Sandisk Z400S SSD / Mini-Box M350 / 24" Westinghouse L2410NM
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hybrid graphics mhbrown41 Video Cards 5 March 21, 2008 05:00 AM
Looking for a graphics benchmark but can't remember the name... Mibs Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking 7 July 12, 2007 01:35 PM
Get your new NVidia Graphics drivers here: Forceware 158 Babrbarossa Video Cards 6 June 2, 2007 08:58 PM
AMD M690 chipset: battery life and graphics performance for mobiles Babrbarossa Press Releases & Tech News 0 April 2, 2007 08:36 PM