Quote:
Originally Posted by Delavan WHAT!!!!!!! No proper driver support on your review sample??? Review delayed I guess...it blows.... |
No delays. It just means less time to test which may mean the elimination of certain tests (Eyefinity, Powertune, etc). To a certain extent, I am happy they are delaying the official press release driver since it seriously cuts down on the number of leaks.
Quote:
On the BIOS switch issue,
I read somewhere that the switch gives you the 375 watts and the 450 watts options
so to keep within specs, you use the 375 watts setting, and if you go 450 watts, AMD doesn't cover damages? What could happen?...
|
AMD does not warrant overclocking. Their board partners are allowed to factor in their own warranties though.
Quote:
|
If we consider the PCI-E slot provides 75 watts and each PCI-E connectors a max of 150 watts (for 375 watts max theorical spec), how could you possibly feed ABOVE SPEC powa to a card?
|
The slot can provide up to 150W of power and each 8-pin connector 150W (6-pin connectors are good for 75W) for a total of 450W. The use of an external connector (molex, etc) needs to be used on the mobo though.
HOWEVER, in order to make the spec backwards compatible with PCI-E 1.x, the PCI-E specification states that no more than 75W can be drawn through the slot.
One of the issues here is the "multi rail" PSUs that exist on the market. Dual GPU cards which draw this kind of power usually do so through the PCI-E connectors. If these are attached to a multi rail PSU with an OCP of 18A (216W) per rail, a user needs to be VERY careful when connecting the card to the PCI-E connectors. They need to ensure each PCI-E connecor is attached to a different rail.