Go Back   Hardware Canucks > NEWS & REVIEWS > Press Releases & Tech News

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old February 20, 2011, 11:37 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lowfat View Post
Then why 8 SATA ports and SATA 6Gbps at that. It just doesn't make sense.
for raid...

AkG, like i've said, if you want extra features buy a different model motherboard, why exactly do you need that many usb ports? what possible benefit could be achieved by using a usb device for any overclocking or benchmarking? I am not aware of any sub zero benchers that use neoprene or rubber to insulate their boards anyway, temperature cycles would make it very fragile and would more than likely deteriorate and crack over time. i can only speak for myself in terms of insulation but i always remove the eraser from the board to ensure it dries out after each bench session.

if you're a serious overclocker (ln2) for pure benching then this is a great board, if not then there are other alternatives that would accommodate your needs. having said all that i really cannot see any logic at all behind your reasons why the board is a 'fail'.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old February 20, 2011, 11:48 PM
AkG's Avatar
AkG AkG is offline
Hardware Canucks Reviewer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,334
Default

Welcome unregistered come and log in and join the group. We are a friendly group here. :)

I assume you have something to do with this design, and you are the one who stated it was benching...so IF this is the case then please answer the basic questions me and lowfat have posed... and once again I'll reiterate them:
1) Why the added SATA controller chip (that just adds to the cost and doesnt any tangilbe benfits...its not like the controller it uses it going to help you score better RAID benchmark numbers (ICH 10 would be better for those scenarios with the exception being sata 6)? This smacks of PR to me and doesnt help benchers out at all.

2)Why not include some form of insulation. You want to go after this niche of niche..yet dont want to take the time, effort and money to do it right? Yes it would cost RnD...but "you" had hicookie to help you out!

3) Why not inlcude some way to actively cool the mobo heatsinks. Its going to be on an open bench...so even with beefy heatsinks the parts under them are going to get TOASTY when you go extreme overclocking...as at the end of the day those heatsinks are still PASSIVE design (and its not like the bencher niche cares about noise levels!)

4) Why not have more USB ports...its not like you need to add an extra controller chip or anything!

Yet it has none of the features that would make it killer / stand out as a becher mobo...so IMHO they halfaresed it and called it a "OC" board. Like I said most people who OVERCLOCK want usability as "we" overclock to get more bang for our buck and boards like this are just an insult to overclockers. IF you want to go after the niche bench market...go for it...BUT dont call it something its not. Don't pretend its something its not. This all adds up to PR gone awry to me and thus it is a fail.

Just my POV and 2 cents. YMMV. :)
__________________
"If you ever start taking things too seriously, just remember that we are talking monkeys on an organic spaceship flying through the universe." -JR

“if your opponent has a conscience, then follow Gandhi. But if you enemy has no conscience, like Hitler, then follow Bonhoeffer.” - Dr. MLK jr
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old February 21, 2011, 03:43 AM
MAC's Avatar
MAC MAC is offline
Associate Review Editor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 992
Default

Here's my opinion with regard to those questions:

1) The SATA 6Gb/s ports (running off the new Marvell 88SE9182 1GB/sec controller) and/or the six SATA 3Gb/s ports could be useful for those benchmarking PCMark. They should probably be using an Areca RAID card, but it can't hurt to have a certain functionality onboard.

2) A good idea in theory, but since the conformal coating would have to be applied after the motherboard was fully assembled, it would be a nightmare to ensure that the various slots and connectors weren't all gunked up. It could absolutely be done, but the extra labour would raise the price of the motherboard considerably.

3) Active cooling isn't really needed on a board like this since it's intended for sub-zero use, and everything around the CPU socket just freezes anyways.

4) Could have been done, but that would have been excessive. 4 ports is perfect: mouse, keyboard, flash drive, and one spare, possibly used for a WiFi stick.

And there's nothing wrong with the name If you want to benchmark competitively, you need to overclock, so fundamentally it is an overclocking motherboard. Also, there's lots of highly skilled guys who just mess around trying to secure the highest possible CPU-Z validation.

For example:

YouTube - 990X X58A-OC
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old February 22, 2011, 05:34 PM
Oversized Rooster's Avatar
Allstar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 609

My System Specs

Default

I wish Gigabyte waited until the successor of X58 before releasing this awesome board. X58 is an end of life chipset. Great as it was, it has outlived its stay. I don't really see a point to a any new X58-based mobo designs.
__________________
Main: Intel 2600K @ 4.8GHz | Gigabyte P67A-UD7-B3 | 16GB Corsair DDR3-2000 | 2 x 240GB Corsair Force 3 in RAID1 | 2 x 4TB Hitachi 7K4000 | 3 x 2TB WD Caviar Black | Antec 1200 | Seasonic XP-860 Platinum | 2GB GTX 670 | 2 x 27" Asus VE278Q | Asus Essence ST | Win7 Pro 64-bit
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old February 22, 2011, 08:11 PM
lowfat's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grande Prairie, AB
Posts: 8,002

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC View Post
Here's my opinion with regard to those questions:

1) The SATA 6Gb/s ports (running off the new Marvell 88SE9182 1GB/sec controller) and/or the six SATA 3Gb/s ports could be useful for those benchmarking PCMark. They should probably be using an Areca RAID card, but it can't hurt to have a certain functionality onboard.
Benching PCMark Vantage is useless w/o a RAID card if you plan on getting a decent score. Even so people don't generally bench it since it doesn't cound on HWBot for points.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old February 24, 2011, 07:58 AM
Reyzac's Avatar
MVP
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 270

My System Specs

Default

I agree it would be nice if they did this color scheme and design in a more consumer-friendly board, with new socket compatibility. Is this the beginning of a series?
__________________
Who needs a real doctor when you got my machines and their scary needles?
I also go by Silver Blues in lots of other places.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old February 24, 2011, 08:20 AM
Eldonko's Avatar
Hardware Canucks Reviewer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,445
Default

I love this board, is perfect for what I want a board for. As mentioned it is a board for benchers and benchers dont need that extra stuff. If you need extra features and extra ports there are plenty of other boards with them.
__________________
Donkeys kill more people annually than plane crashes or shark attacks.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GIGABYTE Details Comprehensive Retrieval and Replacement Strategy for Intel Sandy Bridge Products FiXT Press Releases & Tech News 11 February 3, 2011 12:07 PM
Gigabyte OC Orange Motherboard Sneak Peak FiXT Press Releases & Tech News 10 January 17, 2011 05:42 PM
Gigabyte motherboard Bl4ck_rainbow CPU's and Motherboards 6 December 31, 2010 05:11 AM
Computex 2010: ASRock Details P67 Sandy Bridge Motherboard & More SKYMTL Press Releases & Tech News 0 June 4, 2010 08:15 PM
Gigabyte's orange SATA cables N.V.M. Peripherals 15 April 23, 2010 10:26 AM