Quote:
Originally Posted by MpG This'll be good for production costs (and hopefully final price), and hopefully for clock speeds and power efficiency, but what ATI really needs to start doing is to work with the game developers to the extent that Nvidia's been doing. Love it or hate it, Nvidia's TWIMTBP hasn't been without results. |
Yeah dump millions of dollars in laps of the rich dogs like UBISOFT to pull support for DX10.1 in games because it makes them look bad? I guess thats TWIMTBP.
ATI isn't beaten at their own game, they changed the game, Nvidia has been scrambling to match the 4870 like mad since its release, what how man renames, revamps and re-releases of the same old refrhed rehashed product can one do? Hell they dropped the price what 25% over night after ATIs HD4800 series release?
I would say DAAMIT has Nvidia on the run, with 2 million R700s sold to date? that me boys is a come back.
Do not get me wrong, Nvidia has a great product, but they are the ones scrambling. R800 series is coming as well. A refresh of the R700 isn't out of the ordinary, 55nm is still fresh and new, ATI were the first and bound to see improvements for a refresh and cost reductions.
Competition heralds great things for the consumer, and mark my words, ATI fanbois like myself need Nvidia as much as their Fanbois need ATI.
Can you imagine the crap Intel would produce if there was no AMD? man we all would still be forced to buy Netburst crappola, not the awesome Core2.