Hardware Canucks

Hardware Canucks (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/)
-   Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/overclocking-tweaking-benchmarking/)
-   -   Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/overclocking-tweaking-benchmarking/59884-unigine-valley-benchmark-scores.html)

Phill February 25, 2013 04:57 PM

Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores
 
http://i866.photobucket.com/albums/a...ps8e5c5693.jpg

This was done using the Extreme HD preset

For those interested in giving it a go: Valley Benchmark | Unigine: real-time 3D engine (game, simulation, visualization and VR)

Dzzope February 25, 2013 05:52 PM

Is that setting available in the free version?

Bloodystumps February 25, 2013 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dzzope (Post 692853)
Is that setting available in the free version?


Yes it is

Dzzope February 25, 2013 07:19 PM

Coolio, might try it when I get home in the morning. :)

fortkentdad February 25, 2013 10:34 PM

Very Pretty
 
What a display, sure beats the furry donut of furmark.

Tried to take a screenshot (it is one of the options but I could not find where it saved the screenshot, I wonder if that is for the paid version??) - Print Screen didn't work either and I could not bring up my sniping tool during the bench mark so if you want to see the pretty pictures you'll have to download it. The screen view across three screens is really amazing. The images at their website do not show the full panorama available across three.

http://unigine.com/products/valley/valley3.jpg

Anyway, tested in both Win8 and Win7 and they were close to the same, very close 310 in Win7 and 319 in Win8, with FPS of 7.4 and 7.6. Win8 is running with two HD6670 Xfired, Win7 is running with the A10 APU Xfired with one HD6670. On paper these should be very close to the same thing, and they are. Yep it was a little choppy and gameplay at those setttings wouldn't be the smoothest. I didn't adjust the default settings other than to set it to three screens using the system resolution. Could see what the medium instead of high setting gives me.

Decided to downgrade and test it at a more 'normal' resolution (not 5024x900 which is what I'm running now)

Big difference. The same scene playing on the three screens is can make you dizzy but its cool (not as cool as the panoramic but neat in its own way).

Anyway here are the results, three screen and one screen.

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...mark130224.jpg

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...nglescreen.jpg

fortkentdad February 25, 2013 10:58 PM

Tried it on Medium. Really not much difference. First time I tried it I had the Anti-A on 2x, ... again, next to no difference (it came in at 21.6 FPS so virtually the same).
Here is my system on Medium - Single Screen (well all three were displaying the same image).

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...markmedium.jpg

IRQ Conflict February 25, 2013 11:19 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I was surprised that it ran so well. Though I guess the object isn't necessarily to bring your system to it's knees. Yup, better than furry doughnuts! Check the expiry date!

Rollergold February 26, 2013 12:48 AM

http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/n...ps70ca77f4.jpg

Dzzope February 26, 2013 05:40 AM

got 1530 on my 670 @1260mhz / 3528mhz and 950@4Ghz.. something tells me that it's being affected by something else as a 680 shouldn't be twice the score.

great_big_abyss February 26, 2013 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dzzope (Post 692938)
got 1530 on my 670 @1260mhz / 3528mhz and 950@4Ghz.. something tells me that it's being affected by something else as a 680 shouldn't be twice the score.

...Processor?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:44 PM.