Go Back   Hardware Canucks > PC BUILDERS & TWEAKERS CORNER > Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old April 6, 2008, 05:13 AM
Unklmo's Avatar
Top Prospect
F@H
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mtl, Qc
Posts: 160
Default Speedfan or CoreTemp ?

pretty sure this question has already been discussed, but i'm wondering which one of these 2 app's i should trust to be more accurate with my temp readings.
or should i just split the difference between the two?
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old April 6, 2008, 07:00 AM
enaberif's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgahree, AB
Posts: 11,149
Default

Trust HW Monitor
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old April 12, 2008, 11:06 AM
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8
Default

I posted something similar. From what Ive read is that for 45's Real Temp is the most accurate (according to Extreme OC and Anandtech) and SpeedFan if you can set is properly is 2nd. You have a 65 so I guess SpeedFan (properly adjusted shown be it). That being said im using HW monitor, I just like all the different readings. BUT the most important is how far you are from your Tjmax, which is shown is RealTemp not to sure about Core Temp
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old April 12, 2008, 12:52 PM
3.0charlie's Avatar
3.0 "I kill SR2's" Charlie
F@H
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bedford QC
Posts: 9,943

My System Specs

Default

I used Coretemp with my Quads - and by your s/s, your temps as shown by Coretemp are fine for your cooler. And Coretemp can be configured for Tjunction Delta.
__________________
Hydro-Quebec is salivating...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old April 12, 2008, 12:53 PM
Unklmo's Avatar
Top Prospect
F@H
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mtl, Qc
Posts: 160
Default

ty guys
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes