Go Back   Hardware Canucks > PC BUILDERS & TWEAKERS CORNER > Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old October 6, 2007, 04:33 PM
enaberif's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgahree, AB
Posts: 10,598
Default Core2 overclocking

Since I've now delved into the inner workings of overclocking a core2 I have a questions about the extremes.

1) I know unless you buy a Extreme processor the multiplier is locked but what if you went above the multiplier on a locked cpu, what would happen? Would you fry the chip or damage it? What about an Extreme processor? They say the multiplier is unlocked but how high can you go before it'll damage or not allow the cpu to work?

2) When overclocking you ultimately want your fsb:mem to be 1:1 but it doesn't seem like that is entirely possibly on a Extreme chip. Take this for example...

Example 1
Multiplier @ 10 with FSB @ 1360 (340) = 3.4ghz

Now with memory pc-6400 for example won't run below 400mhz so you can't get a 1:1 ratio.

Example 2
Multiplier @ 13 with FSB @ 1040 (260) = 3.4ghz

Again memory won't run at 260.

So how do you overclock a qx6850 and get a 1:1 or is it even possible?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old October 6, 2007, 04:54 PM
3oh6's Avatar
Hardware Canucks Reviewer
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,052
Default

memory will run whatever you tell it to run, going downwards anyway...not sure why you would think PC2-6400 memory won't run at only 340MHz?

also, the whole idea of wanting to run 1:1 is pretty much null and void with the chipsets of today. they run ratios just as well as 1:1 and faster memory frequency, even with looser timings, is almost always faster than the next lower ratio.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old October 6, 2007, 05:17 PM
enaberif's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgahree, AB
Posts: 10,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3oh6 View Post
memory will run whatever you tell it to run, going downwards anyway...not sure why you would think PC2-6400 memory won't run at only 340MHz?

also, the whole idea of wanting to run 1:1 is pretty much null and void with the chipsets of today. they run ratios just as well as 1:1 and faster memory frequency, even with looser timings, is almost always faster than the next lower ratio.
Well the board I was trying this on wouldn't allow lower than 400mhz :P oddly enough.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old October 6, 2007, 06:42 PM
3oh6's Avatar
Hardware Canucks Reviewer
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,052
Default

i think you are misunderstanding what the BIOS is telling you. what do you mean by "it wouldn't allow lower than 400MHz..."? did the system not boot with the memory set to 1:1 at 340FSB? what board are you referring to?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old October 6, 2007, 06:46 PM
Fallen Folder
F@H
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: folding in GTA
Posts: 375
Default

Without an extreme model you can only lower the cpu multi within the supported range. On a 6600 default is 9 and you can lower it to 7 on most mobos manually.

If speedstep (aka eist) is enabled it will lower vc and multi automatically under low load to save energy and reduce heat. You want to disable eist and c1e when you overclock. EIST if enabled, will not let you adjust vc, at least not on any intel chipset mobo i have used.

I have never used an nvidia chipset mobo with c2d and c2q but i thought they would let you run memory lower than 1:1 ... ie independent of fsb? Other than supporting sli, that was about the only advantage they have over intel chipsets.

If you are running 6400 memory, there should not be a need to run the memory at less than 1:1. 400 fsb at 1:1 will be running 6400 memory at stock speed on intel chipsets. I assume the nvidia runs dual channel so it should be the same.
Not sure how well 4gb of memory will oc beyond stock especially if it is 4x1gb sticks. All my rigs are 2 sticks of 512 or 1gb.

Last edited by pscout; October 7, 2007 at 05:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old October 6, 2007, 08:33 PM
enaberif's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgahree, AB
Posts: 10,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3oh6 View Post
memory will run whatever you tell it to run, going downwards anyway...not sure why you would think PC2-6400 memory won't run at only 340MHz?

also, the whole idea of wanting to run 1:1 is pretty much null and void with the chipsets of today. they run ratios just as well as 1:1 and faster memory frequency, even with looser timings, is almost always faster than the next lower ratio.
Actually I just did some synthetic tests with everest and running 1:1 did yield better performance then when I was not.

But one of my original questions still wasn't answered.. what happens if you were to use a multplier higher than what the cpu is rated at... would it damage it?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old October 6, 2007, 09:00 PM
sswilson's Avatar
Moderator
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 14,490

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enaberif View Post
Actually I just did some synthetic tests with everest and running 1:1 did yield better performance then when I was not.

But one of my original questions still wasn't answered.. what happens if you were to use a multplier higher than what the cpu is rated at... would it damage it?
The CPU will not accept a higher multiplier than stock.

That's the difference between the "uber" procs and those for us normal folks.... the highest end chips do not have their multipliers locked to prevent them from being raised, while the lower end ones only allow you to drop the multiplier downwards.
__________________
MSI Z87I Gaming AC / i5 4670K / 2X 4G Gskill 1866 DDR3 / XFX XTR 750 / EVGA GTX 680 SC+ 2GB / Intel DC S3700 200G / random 160G Sata HDD
Inwin 904 / Swiftech MCP655-b / Alphacool NexXxos XT45 120 Rad / 2X Scythe GT AP-15 / EK Supreme HF / Dell UltraSharp U2412M

Asrock AM1H-ITX / AM1 Athlon 5350 / 2X4G Gskill PC3-14900 / Intel 6235 Wi-Fi / 90W Targus Power Brick / 320G Seagate Momentus / Mini-Box M350 / 1X 22" Dell IPS / 1X 22" HP
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old October 6, 2007, 09:20 PM
enaberif's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgahree, AB
Posts: 10,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sswilson View Post
The CPU will not accept a higher multiplier than stock.

That's the difference between the "uber" procs and those for us normal folks.... the highest end chips do not have their multipliers locked to prevent them from being raised, while the lower end ones only allow you to drop the multiplier downwards.
Ok but what about an extreme chip.. they are unlocked so could you possibly raise the multiplier too high?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old October 6, 2007, 09:24 PM
Fallen Folder
F@H
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: folding in GTA
Posts: 375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enaberif View Post
Ok but what about an extreme chip.. they are unlocked so could you possibly raise the multiplier too high?
I am sure if you raised the multi too high it won't post.

From what i have seen, the highest oc's from these extreme cpus is normally at a lower multi than the defaults.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old October 6, 2007, 09:50 PM
enaberif's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgahree, AB
Posts: 10,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pscout View Post
I am sure if you raised the multi too high it won't post.

From what i have seen, the highest oc's from these extreme cpus is normally at a lower multi than the defaults.
Yah I've seen 333x9 oddly enough! But hey whatever works!

And good to know that it would still work.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Overclocking help tzetsin Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking 41 January 27, 2008 11:05 PM
Overclocking P4 1.8 Kassela Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking 1 December 27, 2007 11:28 AM
Need help overclocking further Kessler Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking 15 December 5, 2007 05:09 PM
Core2 with 865G Chipset Mutant Build sam101p5 CPU's and Motherboards 16 August 5, 2007 02:57 PM
Penryn 45mn= +40% Core2 Extreme in gaming Shadowed Press Releases & Tech News 15 April 17, 2007 11:43 PM