Go Back   Hardware Canucks > PC BUILDERS & TWEAKERS CORNER > Overclocking, Tweaking and Benchmarking

       
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old September 28, 2008, 04:18 PM
FrankyG's Avatar
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shediac,NB
Posts: 156
Default Real Temp or Core Temp ??

Witch is better/accurate to monitor the temps on my CPU ? I have Core Temp 0.99 & Real Temp 2.70 and they give me different temps...
__________________
AMD 1090T
Asus Crosshair IV
8GB Corsair XMS3 1600Mhz
2x ATI HD 5970 Crossfire X
OCZ 120GB SSD
Antec 1200W PSU
Lian Li PC-X1000 Case
Custom Watercooling Kit
Digg this Post!Share on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old September 28, 2008, 04:27 PM
Infiniti's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,384

My System Specs

Default

From what I've seen on other forums, Real Temp is best for monitoring 45nm CPUs, while Core Temp is best for monitoring 65nm CPUs.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old September 28, 2008, 04:43 PM
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 37
Default

That was before now they both have the same tjmax so you will get the same reading from both . for me core temp wins no extra crap when installing it
__________________
E8400 E0 4275 (66 hours orthos stable) @ 1.38v 50deg load /Xfx 780i / 4 GIGz Balistix 6400 / Corsair 620hx / 8800gt @ 740/1800/1000 / Water Cooling
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old September 28, 2008, 04:50 PM
FrankyG's Avatar
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shediac,NB
Posts: 156
Default

I have a 45nm Cpu, Tj max is set to 95 on both programs and Real Temp give me a reading about 10c cooler then Core Temp
__________________
AMD 1090T
Asus Crosshair IV
8GB Corsair XMS3 1600Mhz
2x ATI HD 5970 Crossfire X
OCZ 120GB SSD
Antec 1200W PSU
Lian Li PC-X1000 Case
Custom Watercooling Kit

Last edited by FrankyG; September 28, 2008 at 05:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old September 28, 2008, 05:06 PM
FrankyG's Avatar
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shediac,NB
Posts: 156
Default

Ok got the two programs to read the same temp TJ max was not set to the correct value
__________________
AMD 1090T
Asus Crosshair IV
8GB Corsair XMS3 1600Mhz
2x ATI HD 5970 Crossfire X
OCZ 120GB SSD
Antec 1200W PSU
Lian Li PC-X1000 Case
Custom Watercooling Kit
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old September 28, 2008, 05:09 PM
MpG's Avatar
MpG MpG is offline
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 3,116

My System Specs

Default

You'll likely be fine with either. The latest revision of Coretemp (0.99.3) uses correct TjMax values for the Intel 45nm chips, as taken from some recently found Intel white papers, I'm not sure if Realtemp has issued a corresponding update yet. Realtemp biggest advantage is that it allows you to calibrate your idle temp accuracy, assuming you care about that in the first place.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old September 28, 2008, 05:10 PM
encorp's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,425

My System Specs

Default

I found I preferred Realtemp but either will do the job.
__________________
DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in the immediately preceding post are those of encorp and do not reflect the views and/or opinions of family, friends, or anyone remotely associated with encorp unless explicitly stated. encorp does not make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any liability or responsibility for the quality, factuality or use of information in the immediately preceding post.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old September 28, 2008, 05:11 PM
sswilson's Avatar
Moderator
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 11,448

My System Specs

Default

One thing I prefer about coretemp over realtemp is the inclusion of cpu load.
__________________
ASUS SaberTooth 990FX / AMD 1090T / 2X4 Gig Gskill RJ X / XFX Pro 1000W PSU / 2X MSI 560GTX-Ti Twin Frozr II / Corsair F120 / WD 6401AALS
TT Lvl 10 GT / DDCPX-Pro / EK XT 240 Rad / 2X Scythe Ultra Kaze / EK Supreme HF / XSPC 250mm Res / Dell Ultrasharp 2209WA

Asus CH IV / Athlon II X2 250 / 4X2 Gig GSkill Pi PC3-12800 / 2X GTS 450 / PC P&C 750W Silencer / PA 120.2 /
MCR220-QP-Res / Swiftech MCP350 Pump / XSPC Laing DDC top / EK-Supreme HF / Lian-Li Pitstop T60 / Samsung 931BF
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old September 28, 2008, 06:39 PM
SugarJ's Avatar
Moderator
F@H
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 4,744

My System Specs

Default

And Coretemp displays on your G-15 keyboard lcd too. Temps and load %.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old September 28, 2008, 11:16 PM
Dashock's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,938
Default

I too use Tj max of 95 as im pretty sure my sensors are stuck i use Real temp though.

Because even when i downclock to 1.45ghz at 0.992 it still showed me 30 and 34 degrees on the cores. now i got them at 95 showing 28- 32
__________________
Intel Xeon E3110 @ 3.0ghz
XFX 8800 GT Alpha Dog Edition
Asus P5Q-E
Mushkin Ascent Redline 8000 4gb DDR2 @ 1066 5-5-5-15 2.05v
OCZ 600W GameXstream
Seagate 7200.11 500gb
Seagate 7200.10 320gb
Antec Spot Cool
Logitech X-230
Samsung 32" 720P HDTV



Coolermaster Cosmos S/
Swiftech Mcp655/ MCR-320-QP/ 6X Noctua NF-P12'S/ Swiftech Apogee GT/ Swiftech Mcw-60/ Swiftech Micro-Res.

Reply With Quote
Reply

 

Thread Tools
Display Modes