Quote:
Originally Posted by NI3 Are you absolutley sure that you NEED motx?
You can get 2600 with ATX |
I am sure. The price disparity between the 2500 and 2600 is off putting and I do not believe necessary additionally the Mini ITX form factor is due to the fact that I am very short on space.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Even going mATX would open you up to a lot more choices and potential.
Unless you really need 16GB, I'd stick to 2x4GB (8GB).
Might as well get the i5 2500K, barely costs any extra. No need for a heatsink either since the CPU comes with one that should be adequate enough, and won't pose any height issues.
And you have an IDE hard drive listed, that motherboard has no IDE ports. You'll have to get a SATA hard drive, or a SSD.
If you're building 2 identical systems though, with the intention of rendering, why not build a single dual-CPU-based system? Might end up costing around the same... |
Ok I will take those points into consideration, really thankful for you pointing out the Hdrive. One thing I will point out that when it comes to rendering 3D animation, it is the number of computers rendering multiple frames of the same animation over dual CPUs rendering a single frame of animation in sequence that makes the difference.
Ram is a must because they are going to be loading multimillion polygonal 3D models fully animated and textured.
Lastly, what is the standard idle and load temps using the included heat sink? These things are going to be running full load for up to days at a time?
I am cheating quite a bit since a render slave is usually MUCH less powerful than what I listed but I am only getting 2 of them due to space constraints.
Thank you again!