Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagath I personally dont think BD will outperform SNB, except in one category; Built in GPU.
If this is a HTPC build or the like home computer (World of Warcraft Box, etc) I suspect BD will be the best bang for the buck as it'll save you a discreet GPU.
This is all just my opinion with out a shred of fact. Im actually hoping that BD is the next AMD thing to put Intel back a generation...but I have my doubts. |
I don't have loyalty towards either; I just want the best bang for buck but if one is better in a power efficient/temps way, I'd choose that.
I don't need a discrete gpu but I'll take it if it is not adding to the price. If it's ATI, then I have a Linux issue since it is sometimes a problem. But, I guess you can always disable the onboard gpu and they're getting more efficient?
The only thing I would guess about Intel, though, is it seems to always offer the best performance overall in comparable benchmarks. I figure if you start with a low priced system, you can upgrade to a faster cpu while others move on to the next architecture/generation. I usually don't keep up and go to the next one but I am not sure I want to be too far behind. I just think that DDR2 RAM is getting too expensive and I would like 8GB for a virtual machine but that's going to be expensive. If I go to SNB or BD, I can get the 8GB of DDR3 and a newer, more up-to-date system.