Quote:
Originally Posted by 0o0 You just ninja'ed me again. You should try your hand at a casino....
That review was in 2007. Hyper 212+ was released summer 2009. Oh yea, and that review clearly says Hyper 212. I rest my case that geokilla has been infected with the "zomg hyper 212+ is da best coola evaz!!! so much bang fo' buckz ya babe!!" worm. It's not your fault though, I was the first to get one before there were any reviews or even a picture on ncix for it. All based on AKG's review. I sold it a few months ago for 20 bucks. That's how bad it was. I love my TRUE 120 now, the venomous X is probably even better. |
Underage
Woops. You didn't see that
However I still stuck with what I said. I'd go with the Hyper 212+. I know some people used to own a Hyper 212+ here. Won't point them out, so I'll let them chime in if they wish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lpfan4ever Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, as I'm going all off the top of my head, but I believe the Dark Knight is just a modified HDT-S1283. I believe that was made before i7 was even around, designed for the Core 2 series of processors. Just take a look at the HWC reviews with HDT-S1283 and compare them to the ones with Hyper 212+. |
You are correct. The Dark Knight is the same as the HDT-S1283. There's minor modifications to it that doesn't do much for performance. Same goes for TRUE Black.