Wow, thanks guys, great info here. Just what I needed.
Decision made, picked up a Q6700 NIB and should be here in a week or two.

I didn't know it wouldn't run 45nm quads at all!

I'm pretty sure I've seen some nice overclocks with 45nm
dual core, is my memory wrong or does the 680i run E8xxx cpus? /edit: chart says 680i is OK with E8xxx.
I doubt it will run the new Q8xxx, still haven't read any of the links, will confirm there somewhere I suppose. Linus, would you know?
I like my 680i a lot, it has been very faithfull so far. I'm lucky I guess, and got a good one does well over 500FSB, has been completely stable and is way more mobo than any of the intel boards I have (except maybe my P5K Premium). I'd like to get a nice P45 or X48 board before jumping to i7, but will have to see how long the 680i and Q6700 last me. If I do, I'll
then get a Q9xxx of some sort.
b1lk1, while I am not currently happy with nvidia's recent behavior, this chipset is definately not crap. No offence, none taken, I realise and understand the figure of speach. A
lot of people have had dead or dying 680i's, the mem controller goes to poo.
The first time I used one was for a client build, same board (A1), and it was just on the market. At the time, it was fantastic, and to me, still is (even though it's performance has long been surpassed by other chipsets and boards). The BIOS is extremely easy to set up for any clock, and was the highest performing board I had used at the time. I got one for myself within a month. The thing I liked most about it was that being nV's top of the line, it had all the features and functions available. Every fan header is speed adjustable, lots and lots of fan headers, nVidia ntune works flawlessly with all features available. It reliably goes into and out of standby while overclocked, as well as with power saving features on. For my main PC, I've always gone with the higher end feature rich boards, and never regreted it (except, perhaps, the Abit KV8-MAX3 A64-3200 ClawHammer system that I can't seem to part with lol -- add another one to the museum collection).
The 680i's biggest failing from my point of view is it's incompatibility with the newer cpus. I had a P965 I let go of a few months ago, and I bet
it would run 45nm no problem -- it was a great board, I put a huge variety of cpus through it, but never used it as my main. The 680i has a few quirks I don't like, mostly layout issues and the lack of all solid caps for a board with a lifetime warranty.
Linus, All my vid cards are nvidia, I
do need to be able to run SLI for now. I doubt I will by into a newer nvidia chipset like the 780i etc, but tyvm for the offer! I'll keep it in mind though, might run into a client with the need.
Fritz, I was going to shoot for 10x333 for 3.33GHz first, but may go for the higher FSB first 400x8 (like the QX9770). 400 may be pushing things, don't know till I read these links and try it. I'd be happy with a 3.2GHz 24/7 setting, whatever the FSB is at. Once it proves good and stable, I'll probably run it stock speed (if I can stand it lol), or move it into one of my P35's for a few weeks. Being my main work (as well as play) system, I like to be conservative about overclocking, and careful about backups and archives in case of OS corruption.
Normally, this new cpu would be in my DFI P35 on the bench for a month of overclocking, testing and benching. I'd know
exactly what it is capable of before moving it into the 680i. But since I just got Vista going, I want it in the 680i right away.
I'll move my E6750 into the DFI, and get my OC fix
that way. I wonder how much faster I'll be able to run it? I could only get 3.8GHz stable in the 680i, which isn't bad on air. The DFI has a better cooler, I
may be able to reach 4GHz although possibly just a suicide run.
.