Quote:
Originally Posted by Pelt They built the OS then they select or in some cases commision companies to design hardware that works with the OS thus minimizing varibles that could cause the OS to crash or not perform at top spec. The approach is the same with all software the engineers know what type of hardware they are building the software to work with so they can optimize the code. Just like in the PC world with countless software patches for hardware, with each generation of software they are taking better advantage of the gear. |
This isn't really what's happening. Nobody writes to hit the hardware anymore. The most optimized is going to be assembler language and no one wants to do that for portability reasons.
They write the OS, pick what they figure is suitable hardware (whatever it may be) and then write the necessary APIs or drivers for that hardware. Realistically, having such limited hardware just means it should be easier to track down a bug due to less possible hardware variables. Sure, this is an advantage, but it's also a disadvantage. Try installing a 58xx series ATI card into a Mac and setup Eyefinity, for example.
There almost seems to be an idea that Mac don't have drivers. They certainly do, and when Mac only has one video card driver to update you would at least hope it works to within 75% of what the PC can do with the same hardware.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pelt Apples perform well in the music and movie bussiness because the software designed for those tasks has been optimized to work with the most common hardware setups in Apple computers. That is not to say that PC's can't hold their own in that world but that Apple has done it better for so long that Apple has kind of become the standard. |
It's about the software. If the software is being taught to young 'uns coming out of school, that's what they are going to use. Somehow, this software became the norm, the standard. It's not because of Mac's limitations that it's "better". No amount of optimization is going to shore up the difference between any socket 775 vs a socket 1366 offering. Run that software on the PC or at least an equivalent powered Mac and you'd have a winner.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pelt For every advantage with either platform Apple or PC there are just as many disadvantages. PC are easier to upgrade and more cost effective, and with the implementation of Intel processors in the Apple...<clip> |
This brings me a point. It wasn't very long ago that Mac users were trying to tell me that my PC was shit because it was running an Intel processor. They would RAGE at length about how bad they were and that their PPC processors were so much better. Where are these same guys now?
They are still pointlessly arguing. And losing. And still arguing. Just about different things.
Apparently Intel is teh kewl now.