Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE CANUCKS COMMUNITY > LinusTechTips Q&A

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old December 24, 2011, 02:08 AM
Lyserberg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool the 2700K unboxing please :3

Hello Linus
I actually do wait for the 2700k unboxing,To see how this CPU looks and if it does worth an extra bucks (here euros) to go for over the 2600k
Anyways NCIX is the only one who provides u with this stuff,hoping to see that soon :)
Intel Core i7-2700K Sandy Bridge 3.5 GHz CPU Review - Intel Core i7-2700K CPU - Legit Reviews
here's the review :)
The video rendering is so much better,some motion blur has gone,that proves that ur working on it :3
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old December 24, 2011, 05:18 AM
supaflyx3's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chilliwack BC
Posts: 2,535

My System Specs

Default

Why would he? It's a 2600K with a 100mhz boost. They still clock the same and look exactly the same.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old December 24, 2011, 01:36 PM
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 159

My System Specs

Default

haha yeah its just the cpu, stock heatsink, and the manual with the intel sticker on it, just watch the 2600k,2500k unboxing and for every 5 or 6 you see replace it with a 7
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old December 24, 2011, 02:57 PM
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: laval Qc
Posts: 1,072
Default

most 2600k are better than the 2700k

unless you running stock lol
__________________
maximus IV extreme @ 5.1 1.41v

evga e760 +920 4.8 water5.0+ on phase linx stable
gtx285 tri-sli
dfi ut-p35 lt
e8600@4.6 1.38v
too much ram
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old December 24, 2011, 06:32 PM
wonton1017's Avatar
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 166

My System Specs

Default

Hmm, the five i7 2600k that I've tried needed at least 1.37v to reach 4.8ghz and 1.45v to reach 5ghz.

The i7 2700k's are binned for higher clocks, the first and only one I ever had was delivered 2 days ago and it reached 4.8ghz at 1.32v and 1.4v for 5ghz.

So if you plan to overclock these over the 4.6ghz range, i7 2700k's are USUALLY better.
__________________
!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old December 24, 2011, 08:40 PM
Sagath's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Petawawa, ON
Posts: 2,479

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wonton1017 View Post
Hmm, the five i7 2600k that I've tried needed at least 1.37v to reach 4.8ghz and 1.45v to reach 5ghz.

The i7 2700k's are binned for higher clocks, the first and only one I ever had was delivered 2 days ago and it reached 4.8ghz at 1.32v and 1.4v for 5ghz.

So if you plan to overclock these over the 4.6ghz range, i7 2700k's are USUALLY better.
I have a 2700k. At 1.36v it will do 4.5ghz. Not all chips are equal. Just because its binned for 2700k, doesnt mean its 'better' then the 2600ks for overclockers.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lpfan4ever View Post
AKG shot the hamsters, and then Perineum drove his Mustang with summer tires into the server.
My Disclaimer to any advice or comment I make;
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroSsFiRe2009 View Post
I'm a self certified whizbang repair technician with 20 years of professional bullshit so I don't know what I'm talking about
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old December 24, 2011, 09:15 PM
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: laval Qc
Posts: 1,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagath View Post
I have a 2700k. At 1.36v it will do 4.5ghz. Not all chips are equal. Just because its binned for 2700k, doesnt mean its 'better' then the 2600ks for overclockers.

exactly

my 2600k will do 4.8 1.35v /5.0 1.42v /5.2 1.48v
multi is 54x
__________________
maximus IV extreme @ 5.1 1.41v

evga e760 +920 4.8 water5.0+ on phase linx stable
gtx285 tri-sli
dfi ut-p35 lt
e8600@4.6 1.38v
too much ram
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old December 25, 2011, 12:55 AM
Lyserberg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If Linus already unboxed the 2600K and the 2500k,but also the core i3 2105 and 2100 i can't see any trouble + The Core i7 2700k is without a doubt the new fully fleshed (the king) of 1155 Chips,if u quite read the review you'll find out that it's mostly made for non-OCers,who want to get better perfomance than AMD Bulldozer CPU,actually if i had a PC to buy and i had the 2600k on the list,i wouldn't mind get the 2700k for an extra 15-30 bucks
This extra speed can be very handy
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old December 25, 2011, 10:11 AM
lowfat's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grande Prairie, AB
Posts: 7,917

My System Specs

Default

Remember it is unlocked. So it isn't any faster than the 2600k unless you leave it at stock. Which kind of defeats the purpose of buying an unlocked CPU.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old December 25, 2011, 10:40 AM
Allstar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 644

My System Specs

Default

I didn't think the 2700k was binned at all.

All 2600k chips will run one multiplier higher within spec with ease so why not bump it up and release it as the 2700k and EOL the 2600k.

They're litterally the exact same processor, you can get a good 2600k and a bad 2700k and vice versa.

I'm just curious if a golden 3770k will run 5ghz at 1.35v, cool on air.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i7 2700K released yycraven CPU's and Motherboards 10 October 25, 2011 04:31 PM
Pre-test of Latest Intel Top-Level 4-Cores CPU i7-2700K windwithme CPU's and Motherboards 5 October 21, 2011 11:19 PM
Intel Leaks i7-2700K onethreehill CPU's and Motherboards 9 September 12, 2011 03:54 PM
Best unboxing video ever slugbug Off Topic 5 April 5, 2011 07:59 PM
Unboxing the Corsair SP2500.... Alpine Audio 4 March 22, 2011 08:09 AM