Quote:
Originally Posted by Dead Things In my experience, eight threads is usually around the cut-off of where it stops making sense to combine GPU and CPU folding. My guess is that you are probably coming out ahead with both, but not by as much as you might think. So if it's just raw PPD you're after, then I'm sure the status quo will work for you.
The main metric that most concerns me, though, is PPD/W. I try to limit myself to 30 amps for folding due to the cost of hydro. So squeezing as much PPD out of every watt is important to me. And unfortunately, PPD/W is not a metric on which GPU folding does well. So if you pay for your own hydro, you may find that the extra little bit of PPD you net from running both clients simply isn't worth the extra hydro costs. |
Agreed indeed. ppd / w and ppd / $ can be closely related, or as far apart as you wish. Quick returns are of the GPU realm, where as QRB (Quick Return Bonus) mandate a 2p/4p rig. Such rigs demand deep pockets, but in return can produce 10x the ppd that the best GPU can produce. Such as this, single rig:
That's the sole reason why I went 4p: ppd / $ and ppd / w (505W under full load). Nowhere near the heat generated by a GPU setup, and it could be dead silent too if I had chosen to use Noctua HSFs instead of the Dynatrons.
I second DT's comment about having a folder local to GVR to sit down, and actually go through the process of building a rig (component choices), and going about the OS install, optimization and eventually the Client setup. Doing so, you make sure you understand the intricacies of folding, and by the same token you can confirm that nothing was forgotten. 'cause in the end, the rig will be folding...