Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE CANUCKS COMMUNITY > HardwareCanucks F@H Team

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old January 25, 2012, 11:35 AM
G777's Avatar
Allstar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Coquitlam,BC
Posts: 541

My System Specs

Default X79, ram, and f@h

Thought this was interesting, while fooling around last night with a little overclocking I borrowed a couple sticks from my X79 rig to run some benchmarks on P67. I left the rig to fold overnight with only the two remaining sticks, and woke up this morning to a significant drop in PPD.

The socket 2011 machine is a 3960X@4.7Ghz paired with 4x4Gb of G.Skill 2133 ram cas 9. So 16GB of memory running quad channel.
I've had nothing but P6904 units for weeks so I'm pretty familiar with it's performance. (Numbers are running Linux client via VirtualBox.)

TPF is around 51mins, PPD ~114,00

So overnight the rig was running in dual channel, 2X4GB of the same 2133 c9 ram, memory usage was under 6GB in total so it wasn't maxed out.

TFP rose to 61 mins, PPD sunk to 95,000

This was a bigger hit than I would have thought going from dual to quad channel, maybe there's something else going on that I'm missing, but thought I'd share.
__________________
_______________________________________________

HWC Overclocking Team, breaking hardware for fun!

Team Thread
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old January 25, 2012, 12:07 PM
Dead Things's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Centre of the Universe
Posts: 1,572

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G777 View Post
This was a bigger hit than I would have thought going from dual to quad channel, maybe there's something else going on that I'm missing, but thought I'd share.
We saw something similar with the 2P and 4P G34 rigs insomuch as there was a considerable amount of performance to be gained from higher frequency/lower latency RAM in quad-channel. It's interesting because that was essentially the first platform to witness a gain in FAH performance from RAM. By comparison, LGA1366 provided no discernible difference in switching between tri-channel or dual-channel.

Having said that, I share your surprise. I figured part of the reason why memory bandwidth made as much of a difference on G34 is because each processing thread needs its own address space, so a large MP system would depend more heavily on RAM performance. Your findings, though, would suggest it has more to do with the quad-channel bandwidth itself being particularly agreeable to FAH. This is indeed interesting. Thanks for sharing!
__________________
Follow my folding, mining & benching shenanigans @dt_oc!

Think you can overclock? Then show us what you got!
Join the Hardware Canucks Overclocking team today!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old January 25, 2012, 12:11 PM
Tim_H's Avatar
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 216
Default

I know that it's an issue with a AMD G34 setup, regardless of the number of processors in it so it makes sense I guess.

edit: Ninja'd by DT

Last edited by Tim_H; January 25, 2012 at 12:12 PM. Reason: ninja
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old January 25, 2012, 12:44 PM
chrisk's Avatar
Folding Captain
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: GTA, Ontario
Posts: 7,406

My System Specs

Default

Interesting...I would have said prior to your post it makes no real difference.
__________________
Fold for team #54196
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes