Hardware Canucks

Hardware Canucks (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/)
-   HardwareCanucks F@H Team (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardwarecanucks-f-h-team/)
-   -   6128's for sale soon... (http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardwarecanucks-f-h-team/49903-6128s-sale-soon.html)

dandelioneater December 30, 2011 09:20 PM

6128's for sale soon...
 
:whistle: I think I have a problem....
http://i1112.photobucket.com/albums/...r1/Capture.png

lowfat December 30, 2011 09:27 PM

Didn't 3.0 just post how these are rather poor folding CPU's? http://smiliesftw.com/x/dunno.gif

dandelioneater December 30, 2011 09:30 PM

should still be an increase in production, No?

3.0charlie December 30, 2011 09:39 PM

They are not 'poor' folding CPUs. BD does not deliver what we expected. Still, twice the cores will do it. But core-for-core, no advantage. Yet.
Also, running -bigadv -smp 64 is 'finicky', at best. Folding 2 Clients with -smp 32 may be better. YMMV.

Let us know!

CMetaphor December 30, 2011 09:40 PM

I remember the "good ol days" when 6 cores meant having a 4P server.... lol.

dandelioneater December 30, 2011 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3.0charlie (Post 584775)
They are not 'poor' folding CPUs. BD does not deliver what we expected. Still, twice the cores will do it. But core-for-core, no advantage. Yet.
Also, running -bigadv -smp 64 is 'finicky', at best. Folding 2 Clients with -smp 32 may be better. YMMV.

Let us know!

Will do

Rison December 31, 2011 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dandelioneater (Post 584768)
:whistle: I think I have a problem....

I see no problem here.

chrisk December 31, 2011 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rison (Post 584939)
I see no problem here.

LMAO awesome!

Let us know how this turns out D


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:48 PM.