![]() |
Folding in Linux Faster? I saw the thread about folding in linux being faster and tried it out, I'm using virtualbox + linux64-fah and my TPF is like 13:38 on regular SMP unit...it should be like 3:30ish. I'm folding on an i7 920 @ 4Ghz whats going on !?!?!??! |
Because Virtualbox sucks. Stick w/ VMWare. You want to do this. Folding@Home - VMWare Player 3.0 and Folding Bigadv Support - LinuxForge.net |
ah ok ill try vmware approach vs virtual box |
Quote:
|
I'm using virtual box for linux folding, and it is better than vmware in one way: can take 12 cores instead of 8. So my 970 don't get underutilized. To the OP, get yourslef an affinity management program (i use process lasso 64 bit) and set the vm to all cores and idle priority. This way you should see 100% cpu usage and get TPF that is logical. |
Quote:
What kind of PPD are you getting? |
SMP performance in Vbox has improved a lot since it was first introduced in 3.0. |
ok, so i am trying some linux folding right now, never operated linux in my life but I am following some guides and says that i picked up a 6884 project that has 14 days preferred deadline. I have a Ph II @3.2GHz. Is it normal to get that? or I am doing something wrong? [01:19:29] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%) [01:23:21] Writing local files [01:23:21] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%) so my tpf is 3 min 52s. credit is 69 PPD. is there something wrong in here? |
I think you need to let it fold at least 3 frames to get accurate tpf and ppd numbers... |
Quote:
It should pick a SMP wu right after that one. And like Mr. Boggs said the first frames tpf don't mean much... |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:24 AM. |