winders smp benchmark thread

[_dangtx_]

for some reason it doesnt feel right.ppd wise. what do you think?

[bwm]

Originally Posted by _dangtx_

for some reason it doesnt feel right.ppd wise. what do you think?

P2653 definitely lags my Q6600 at 3.5, which usually runs 2130 or so PPD
Thats a cream of the crop work unit bro. One ya wanna see a lot of with an inhell chip
Phenoms may prefer different work units for one reason or another, I dunno. I'm learning from
this too ya know.

And yes, I was slow. Sorry bout that but me lady had me in one of those liplocks LOL.

[_dangtx_]

post a pic of your benchmark..i think its running in safe mode i cant get it to force to ignore previous issues or whatever...even tough the advmethods flag is there

[bwm]

Originally Posted by _dangtx_

post a pic of your benchmark..i think its running in safe mode i cant get it to force to ignore previous issues or whatever...even tough the advmethods flag is there

Ya really don't need that flag. Just do a normal restart then edit the shortcut command to include only the -smp switch. Remember - all small letters, no caps.

That pic with the fat juicy p2653 is already posted around here somewhere but I'll upload another if I can find it again.

[bwm]

Originally Posted by _dangtx_

post a pic of your benchmark..i think its running in safe mode i cant get it to force to ignore previous issues or whatever...even tough the advmethods flag is there

Found a better one. Twas a very good day

[_dangtx_]

ok so its not that far off lol. 8mb cache vs 2mb cache shows its mussle :) but pales in comparison to gpu..

what run is it tough? the ycan vary wildly

[bwm]

Originally Posted by bwm

Found a better one. Twas a very good day

Wait a min, that pic is effed up, obviously. The highlited one is a p2653 but its only showing 1554 PPD. Way Way incorrect. I dunno What happened there unless the CPU defaulted back down to stock at 2.4. Look at the other two higher up, 2100 and 2003 PPD on those, also p2653's. Much more typical on mine.

[_dangtx_]

i told you they vary...when you take a screenie make sure its got full info..

[bwm]

Originally Posted by _dangtx_

i told you they vary...when you take a screenie make sure its got full info..

What exactly do you mean by full info? Like the columns I chose for display??

[LCB001]

Originally Posted by bwm

Wait a min, that pic is effed up, obviously. The highlited one is a p2653 but its only showing 1554 PPD. Way Way incorrect. I dunno What happened there unless the CPU defaulted back down to stock at 2.4. Look at the other two higher up, 2100 and 2003 PPD on those, also p2653's. Much more typical on mine.

Especially running dual SMP's the ppd will be effected by which WU the GPU is running. Your rig 1 looks like it's gpu is running a 511 pointer in that screenshot which like the 353's can use more CPU resources. My quads ppd drops ~200+ points when running the 353's, luckily I haven't had the WU's in a long while.

If your looking for win SMP numbers, my quads do ~2200ppd on a 2665 and ~3200+ ppd on the 2653's depending on which WU's the gpu's are running...