Go Back   Hardware Canucks > HARDWARE CANUCKS COMMUNITY > HardwareCanucks F@H Team

    
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old October 7, 2009, 09:23 AM
Exmortis's Avatar
Top Prospect
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 172
Default Quit Folding

As of today one can remove my folding sign, I have removed the software from all 4 machines I have working. I am tired of Pande group playing favorite camps, working on disease should be fair and even, but Intel and Nvidia get all the glory. ATI has released its newest card and still Pande group uses brook, how long can one ignore the favors being played. They still have not impelmented any AMD optimizations, but sure have for Intel. Nvidia was late to the party but given centre seat.

Worst part is I have 3 dual core Intels working, 1 AMD quad, which could have been a 5870, but no more.

Sorry all, I will move on, there will be no more updates on my Folding name. maybe SETI plays fair? all for the better anyway, I will save on electricity with machines no longer on 24hrs a day.
__________________
Exmortis's System

Corsair 600T White
Asus RoG Maximus V Gene
Intel i7-2600K w/Corsair H100
16GB Gskill DDR3 2400MHz
AMD R9 290X
OCZ Revo 3 240GB
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB
WD Velocirapter 600GB
LG DVD burner
LG Bluray Burner
Windows 7x64 Prem
Asus VE24/VE27/VE24
Logitech Z-5450 5.1 speakers
Corsair AX850 Gold PSU
Corsair K90 Keyboard
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old October 7, 2009, 09:54 AM
stoanee's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lacombe Alberta
Posts: 3,253

My System Specs

Default

Sorry to hear that, it can be frustrating sometimes. Thanks for helping out and if you change your mind please c'mon back to HWC!
__________________
heatware
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old October 7, 2009, 10:15 AM
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,361

My System Specs

Default

It sure does suck, but I'm hoping there will be some changes made in the future (near) so that it works with a similar productivity independently of the brand. In the meantime, I still think that the littleI give is already a step in the right direction, no matter how small it is.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old October 7, 2009, 10:59 AM
El_Fiendo's Avatar
Allstar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 579
Default

Folding Forum • View topic - Is PG getting ready for R8xx? [Yes]

He's an AMD rep, and he spends his entire time talking about implementing OpenCL as a way for ATI to get more points. Apparently the main reason ATI takes longer is because it doesn't have enough cache to store all the results it gets in intermediate calculations and thus needs to recalculate a lot more compared to NVIDIA. The fact that an ATI rep comes on and announces ATI is working on ways of improving their product for F@H makes me think you shouldn't be accusing Stanford of bias.

Further info Folding@home: Update on new FAH cores and clients

Remember this:
Both ATI Stream and CUDA were announced around the same time. However ATI couldn't get Stream out to the public until December 2008, a full 2 years after announced and close to 1 and 3/4 years after NVIDIA. What did NVIDIA's first GPGPUs pull for PPD? Well I don't know the numbers they pulled when first released because that was 3 years ago and I'm not sure what console support they had or had to wait for, but I know my 8800GTX pulled between 4k and 4.5k as of a few months ago. What I'm suggesting is, perhaps it'd be best to let ATI mature into their GPGPU architecture and actually develop for it. As far as it sounds to me, its a hitch on ATI's end, not Stanfords.

Dunno man, its up to you in the end. But I think you're giving Stanford the short end of the stick.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old October 7, 2009, 12:39 PM
Allstar
F@H
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 661

My System Specs

Default

I'm sorry all I heard was "I'm taking my toys and going home"

If you actually believed in the work done then you'd soldier through, sounds a lot like you were only in it for the points and contests. Perhaps you do believe in the work they're doing, if so hope to see you back when they better utilize whatever hardware you have at the time.
__________________
QuadZilla & The Four Horsemen

Have an A-1 day!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old October 7, 2009, 12:59 PM
SKYMTL's Avatar
HardwareCanuck Review Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,763
Default

Sorry, I take some serious issues with this thread. The way folding is done on an Nvidia card is totally different from the way AMD does it. There is a limited amount of cache on ATI cards which means results have to be calculated and distributed differently.

Don't blame Stanford. Blame the people over at ATI who never thought much about GPGPU's popularity and then released a half-baked "Stream Compute" interface just to pull their balls out of the fire.

Want to talk about BrookGPU? The language that hasn't moved an inch since something like two years ago? Optimizing Brook to run on Brook+ isn't the easiest thing in the world either considering all of the AMD hardware optimizations including double precision processing and other stuff.

All of these ATI blow-hards that are showing up on every forum these days really makes me wonder where all the intelligence went. It was Nvidia who spearheaded Folding@home on the GPU and it was ATI who said (once again) "me too!" and then started bitching. And you expect the development cycle to be the same? Come on.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old October 7, 2009, 01:16 PM
Dr_BenD_over's Avatar
Fallen Folder
F@H
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,418

My System Specs

Default

I could have sworn I was folding on an Ati GPU long before Nvidia barged in the door.
__________________
All's well that's Haswell
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old October 7, 2009, 01:42 PM
El_Fiendo's Avatar
Allstar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr_BenD_over View Post
I could have sworn I was folding on an Ati GPU long before Nvidia barged in the door.
Right, until NVIDIA applied 'GPGPU's and CUDA to folding. ATI had a GPGPU program at the same time, but have done little with it. The guys at Stanford aren't experts in ATI hardware and coding and definitely shouldn't be targeted as not doing enough. Remember, they have CPU and NVIDIA coding to do as well. So why isn't ATI, the experts of their own hardware, stepping up and making as big a fuss out of folding as NVIDIA did? I'm sure that if ATI put their hearts to it they'd be able to code for something as relatively simple as F@H.

They talk about coding for OpenCL, which has only just come into the spotlight, so that eventually everything will fold well and can be done with one client. Though again, this takes time. They didn't develop ATI Stream or Brook, both of which have been out for awhile. So hopefully ATI develops stuff for OpenCL to make up for it.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old October 7, 2009, 01:45 PM
somecanadianguy's Avatar
Hall Of Fame
F@H
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: somecanadiancity
Posts: 1,118

My System Specs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by El_Fiendo View Post
Folding Forum • View topic - Is PG getting ready for R8xx? [Yes]

He's an AMD rep, and he spends his entire time talking about implementing OpenCL as a way for ATI to get more points. Apparently the main reason ATI takes longer is because it doesn't have enough cache to store all the results it gets in intermediate calculations and thus needs to recalculate a lot more compared to NVIDIA. The fact that an ATI rep comes on and announces ATI is working on ways of improving their product for F@H makes me think you shouldn't be accusing Stanford of bias.

Further info Folding@home: Update on new FAH cores and clients

Remember this:
Both ATI Stream and CUDA were announced around the same time. However ATI couldn't get Stream out to the public until December 2008, a full 2 years after announced and close to 1 and 3/4 years after NVIDIA. What did NVIDIA's first GPGPUs pull for PPD? Well I don't know the numbers they pulled when first released because that was 3 years ago and I'm not sure what console support they had or had to wait for, but I know my 8800GTX pulled between 4k and 4.5k as of a few months ago. What I'm suggesting is, perhaps it'd be best to let ATI mature into their GPGPU architecture and actually develop for it. As far as it sounds to me, its a hitch on ATI's end, not Stanfords.

Dunno man, its up to you in the end. But I think you're giving Stanford the short end of the stick.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4DoorGTZ View Post
If you actually believed in the work done then you'd soldier through, sounds a lot like you were only in it for the points and contests. Perhaps you do believe in the work they're doing, if so hope to see you back when they better utilize whatever hardware you have at the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
Sorry, I take some serious issues with this thread. The way folding is done on an Nvidia card is totally different from the way AMD does it. There is a limited amount of cache on ATI cards which means results have to be calculated and distributed differently.

Don't blame Stanford. Blame the people over at ATI who never thought much about GPGPU's popularity and then released a half-baked "Stream Compute" interface just to pull their balls out of the fire.

Want to talk about BrookGPU? The language that hasn't moved an inch since something like two years ago? Optimizing Brook to run on Brook+ isn't the easiest thing in the world either considering all of the AMD hardware optimizations including double precision processing and other stuff.

All of these ATI blow-hards that are showing up on every forum these days really makes me wonder where all the intelligence went. It was Nvidia who spearheaded Folding@home on the GPU and it was ATI who said (once again) "me too!" and then started bitching. And you expect the development cycle to be the same? Come on.
+1000000

If ATI users aren't happy with the ppd they're getting buy an Nvidia card to fold with until ATI gets their together.
Or just sell your ATI card alltogether and go with Nvidia because their cards play all the games and fold like crazy too.
I'm sure eventually ATI will get things sorted out... it just may take a while.

Don't let stuff like this turn you away from folding.
It's for a good cause... shouldn't matter how many ppd you are getting really.
The competition is fun, but that's really not what it's all about.
Just do the best you can with your hardware or get new hardware.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old October 7, 2009, 01:58 PM
Soultribunal's Avatar
Moderator
F@H
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 8,068

My System Specs

Default

We all choose to do our own things for whatever reasons.
In the end though to be honest I don't care how we get to the conclusion so long as we get there.
If you choose to walk away, thats fine.
For me I am fighting tooth and nail to get back into it lol.

Any research done, any way we help the cause is worthwhile.

When one person donates a can of goods to the foodbank its nothing.
When 1million do it, people aren't hungry anymore.
Does anyone care if a lot of people donate the same stuff? Nope, because the ends are more important.

Do I care that nVidia is better than ATI atm? Nope.
All I care about is waiting for the day when the Dr's say "Oh thats just Cancer, here, take these and see me in two weeks".

My Mom is a double survivor.
And I have brushed close with it for 5 years.
So, yeah.

ST
__________________




"We know not why he calls for us, only that when he does we must answer" - DMP 2009

"Dear Iceberg, I am sorry to hear about global warming. Karma is a bitch. Signed - Titanic"

I would rather believe and find god doesn't exist than to not believe and find that he does.

www.realhardwarereviews.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Absolute best Folding GPU for Folding CasheKicker HardwareCanucks F@H Team 21 February 14, 2012 10:54 AM
Get me folding! KrisMRT HardwareCanucks F@H Team 12 September 19, 2009 12:37 AM
Enough for 24/7 folding ??? crazyhorsejohnny Power Supplies 5 February 21, 2009 06:28 AM
Joaquin Phoenix says will quit film for music BALISTX Off Topic 2 October 30, 2008 09:37 AM
VIA to Quit MB Chipset Business Spaceman-Spiff CPU's and Motherboards 3 August 11, 2008 05:05 PM