FaHMON: Cannot Connect To Server

[SKYMTL]

Originally Posted by LCB001

That's strange, I've never heard of a 345 point Nvidia WU unless its new. They should be either 480, 384, 511 or 353 points. The F@H project chart does not list a 345pt WU for any client. Wish I could help more, but I use Fahspy not FahMon...

Edit/ Do you have a project # for that 345pt WU?...

Yes, you are right. 353 points. 90 minutes.

[LCB001]

Originally Posted by SKYMTL

Yes, you are right. 353 points. 90 minutes.

Something is very wrong then as my 9800GTX+ does a 353pt WU in about 71 min. My shaders are at 1987MHz but still, a 285 should do it in maybe an hour...

Edit/ btw a 353pt WU in 71 mins works out to ~7140ppd...

[SKYMTL]

Looks like I will have to look further into this. Maybe it is the same issue that is causing problem with FAHMON.

[SKYMTL]

FYI, working on a 511 point WU and it looks to be running @ 6972 PPD with the GTX 285. Thoughts?

[3.0charlie]

My 9800GT w/shaders at 1728 does 4046 ppd on a similar WU. LCB is the ppd guru - he'll tell you how the card matches to others.

I can't compare with my data since none of my big guns (4870, GTX260, GTX280) never folded those WUs.

[LCB001]

Originally Posted by SKYMTL

FYI, working on a 511 point WU and it looks to be running @ 6972 PPD with the GTX 285. Thoughts?

I want one . If its doing ~7000ppd on a 511pt WU it will probably get around 8500-10000 on a regular WU. Those WU's drop my ppd down to 4460 from ~6000 on a 384pt, ~6200 on a 480pt and ~7140on a 353pt WU according to FahSpy.
Maybe someone with a 280 could give their points for comparison...

Edit/ Checking the F@H forums for comparisons;
GX2's are doing around 4200-4400 ppd per core
295's are doing 5200 and 5450 ppd per core on a 511pt WU

[Alwaysrun]

rjbarkers got 2 280s we need to recruit him.

Not a 280 but here's a few common ones we've seen today discussed. These were all done today at stock shaders set to 1404.


Project : 5766
Core : GPUv2 Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 353
-- GTX 260 Black --
Min. Time / Frame : 38s - 8026.11 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 38s - 8026.11 ppd
Cur. Time / Frame : 38s - 8026.11 ppd
R3F. Time / Frame : 38s - 8026.11 ppd
Eff. Time / Frame : 39s - 7820.31 ppd
----------------------------------------------
Project : 5754
Core : GPUv2 Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 511
-- GTX 260 Black --
Min. Time / Frame : 1mn 18s - 5660.31 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 1mn 23s - 5319.33 ppd
Cur. Time / Frame : 1mn 18s - 5660.31 ppd
R3F. Time / Frame : 1mn 20s - 5518.80 ppd
Eff. Time / Frame : 1mn 36s - 4599.00 ppd
----------------------------------------------
Project : 5759
Core : GPUv2 Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 384
-- GTX 260 Black --
Min. Time / Frame : 46s - 7212.52 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 46s - 7212.52 ppd
Cur. Time / Frame : 51s - 6505.41 ppd
R3F. Time / Frame : 47s - 7059.06 ppd
Eff. Time / Frame : 46s - 7212.52 ppd

[SKYMTL]

Yeah, I am getting around ~8800 PPD on a 384pt WU.

As for GTX 295s, if you can show me one person getting one to work on Vista x64 with both cores, let me know where since I have four of those cards sitting here...

[crazyhorsejohnny]

Originally Posted by SKYMTL

Yeah, I am getting around ~8800 PPD on a 384pt WU.

As for GTX 295s, if you can show me one person getting one to work on Vista x64 with both cores, let me know where since I have four of those cards sitting here...

Lucky you !

[LCB001]

Originally Posted by SKYMTL

Yeah, I am getting around ~8800 PPD on a 384pt WU.

As for GTX 295s, if you can show me one person getting one to work on Vista x64 with both cores, let me know where since I have four of those cards sitting here...

Can`t find anybody doing it on Vista x64 yet, XP yes but not Vista. Will keep looking...